this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
612 points (99.7% liked)

News

37952 readers
2203 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thousands of Southern Baptists overwhelmingly voted Wednesday to advance a formal ban on women pastors in the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, sending a clear message that men alone should preach to these conservative evangelical congregations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Schadrach 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“hey, you know what? ten year olds are too young to marry. don’t be a fucking creep.”

In their cultural context, that wouldn't be that far outside the norm. The notion that there's this magical line at 16-18 (in the US, depending on the state - possibly lower if the older partner is close in age or if they are married) is a 20th century invention. So, a guy from a text about 2000 years ago not expressing views on age and sexuality that were invented less than a hundred years ago is not exactly shocking.

Before the industrial revolution, children were often treated like smaller adults. Childhood was much shorter than nowadays and adolescence basically wasn't a thing culturally for the vast majority of history.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

According to researchers of Christianity, Mary would have been around 12 to 14. And obviously there would have been a massive power imbalance between her and a deity. So by modern standards, Mary could not consent and was sexually abused. And then of course he left her to raise Jesus, his bastard child. All Christians essentially worship a child rapist. I'm not religious, but I like to think that god hasn't returned because the other gods have him serving time.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

you wanna get into even more cursed territory?

Trinitarian Christians- which is the vast majority of Christians- believe Jesus is and always has been god. So Jesus raped Mary.

I don't think they thought the whole trinity thing through.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

First off, it’s teally weird that you assume I’m okay with older creeps banging teens.

In a practical sense, there has to be a legal age, and every country in the world has defined it somewhere.

That said, it’s not Just 2,000 years ago. And where do you going the creepy old perverts marrying 10 year olds in the us get the idea that’s okay?

It ain’t from the numerous rigorous psych studies looking at the harm it does.

To be clear, when I say something is “immoral” that is an objective statement derived from my subjective morals- which are based on the idea that things that one’s acts should do the least harm or most good they can; and that unnecessary harm is always wrong.

Objectively, slavery and child marriage (I would call it child rape) is always on the extreme end of “harm”.

So while it may be engaging in presentism, I would say that according to my morals, the vast majority of cultures 2,000 years ago were immoral.

By Iron Age standards, Jesus may have been a good dude. But those standards suck, and I find them horrific.

I also find that statement dubious. In mark 7 and Matt 15, we find Jesus literally arguing that the Pharisees have stepped away from the law by not stoning disobedient children, where the Pharisees and other rabbis at the time have decided to severely limit that to the extent it almost didn’t happen.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And telling people to free their slaves is heavily implied by the "give up everything you have and follow me" thing.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

To whom or what were the possessions given up?

The rest of the community. Things that couldn’t be brought with (or weren’t needed,) were sold.

Things that couldn’t be sold were abandoned.

Jesus never called for slaves to be freed; because he saw it as normal and acceptable (and probably even “good”). Which is why the best you’ve got is “it’s implied in this thing in which it was never actually implied.”