this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

Main, home of the dope ass bear.

16146 readers
78 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Evrart, measurehead, cuno and Egghead. That party will be everywhere.

My reasoning
Measurehead is super dedicated and if he studied Marx as much as he has studied phrenology then he'd be great at educating people - assuming his condescention is a quirk of racial supremacist ideology and not a peculiarity of his own.
Cuno seems like the type to be a young stalin in a few years.
Evrart gets stuff done and would be great at organizing as well as financing and planning.
Egghead has the popular outreach and agitprop out the ass.

The Don'ts

  • Kim is cool, but he doesn't seem good for advancing a political party.
  • Same goes for Klaasje.
    Both are too detached/too focused on what they have going on to do anything bigger. They might get swept along, but thats not a good investment.
  • Joyce is already a commie, she has chosen to be a class traitor. A commie Joyce would be something like Chiang Kai Shek when he was with Sun Yat Sen, or so I Imagine.
  • Sunday friend would just be your average hexbear poster. He'd be discarded by liberal intelligentsia immediately. Best you could hope for is he becomes a Richard Wolff type.
  • Hardie would be a great asset, but I think a commie measurehead would be like him but better.
  • Cryptofascist would also just be a poster. Best case is a B-tier chapo.
  • The girl from the kiosk is cool, but she seems like the type that would grow out of whatever political beliefs she has, and not one to do a whole bunch. She's probably got enough going on.
  • The deserter is already a commie, hes just super depressed. He'd just be a super depressed murderous commie who doesnt have regressive views I suppose, which isn't a whole lot. Evrart and measurehead would be much better for ideological reinforcement.
  • Soona I dont remember a lot about. I think she was very tech-savvy, but also had an imperious attitude towards those outside of her field? If im wrong about the latter then that makes her better, but still, I figure between Evrart, Cuno and Egghead you're going to find some sort of trustworthy and competent techie. Or maybe on measureheads semen retention forums.
  • Why would I ever want to pick George? Nothing against the guy as such, but why is he even an option? And for 3 réal? What are his attributes? Doesn't he have memory issues and a drinking problem? That's just Harry, but worse.
  • Harry has too much going on, though he can be very empathetic and having a cop in the group can't hurt, if the cop is committed to your side. Too expensive though, since he is so unreliable.

Alternative draft picks.Evrart and endless cuno.
Evrart and Joyce, if you think Joyce wouldnt just stab herself in the heart and the party in the back as soon as she could get rich off of doing so.
In my eyes Evrart is the linchpin. He seems like the perfect head for an upstart political organisation. Everything should be built around him. I think Evrart and a group of dedicated youths would be a solid starting point.

Cuno and Egghead are both risks I suppose. If I could I think I'd replace them with Titus, Kim or other cops or Union members. On the other hand I think one should also invest in the future, whatever happens its a marathon, not a sprint. Having Cuno and Egghead be mentored by someone heavy into theory and someone who would make Lenin look even-handed, theyd probably become absolute beasts of party machines.

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I thought Joyce was an Ultra liberal?

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Im being tongue in cheek. She is an ultraliberal, but she also understands communism and materialism and the like. In my mind it is incredibly rare that someone actually understands marxism, yet reject it still.
Understanding marxism makes you a marxist. If you then decide to still act at the behest of neoliberalism, then you're truly evil, you're going against your own rationality and what you understand to be for the best for society.
I know that's just me being a word fucker, but I hope it makes sense.

The way i see it its nearly impossible to understand communism and not be a communist. Its like that guy in the matrix who chooses to go back - he knows its all fake. I sort of figure Joyce is the same way.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

A lot of very wealthy people understand dialectical materialism somewhat instinctively, because it is important to understand the way money works to keep it and make more of it.

They might not even know Marx, but their lived experience has taught them what is already apparent in Capital.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

She was born in Revachol and probably studied economy.

I know a economic major, her curriculum included Das Kapital and she still became an Ultralib. Really into Hayek. Might be a Europe thing.

I also set next to a table of some Spanish economists (one of them literally said "we are all economists" to the group. I guess they weren't actually all Spanish because then they wouldn't have been speaking English) in a Korean restaurant a few days ago. They were talking shit about the Sandinistas and about how corrupt African countries are because the company one of them worked for bribed some officials and made a project bigger than necessary. Sort of Joyce vibes too.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

She's also an negotiator and knows how to talk to people. Knows how to talk to Union bosses. So it shouldn't be a surprise she knows how to talk to the big communism builder.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not instinctive (in general), it's an important element of their "job" besides owning things. They need to know how to defuse or redirect (and then defuse) populist movements.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean instinctive because it is not structured the same way that studying dialectical materialism from a Marxist framework would be. You kind of just pick it up by owning shit and being halfway competent at it.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

I think that you might be impressed by the level of detailed instruction higher-level managers and the like sometimes get in terms of undermining organizing, promoting false consciousness, etc. There are silly franchisees, careless nepo babies, and nouveau riche rentiers who don't get the same level of education on the topic, but I don't think the machine could maintain itself if everyone was like them (even to the degree that it does, as it bleeds slowly to death before our eyes in part because of those incompetent subgroups).

I agree that, for petty bourgeois people who succeed, there's probably a large element of tacit knowledge and such rather than explicit knowledge (though they too are capable of research).

Anyway, I just wanted to present some points to consider.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Sure, but the super wealthy don't. In part because large amounts of money changes your brain. Look at the billionaires that are politically engaged, even Peter Thiel, scary as he is, doesn't really understand how the world works.

[–] Moss@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

She has a good understanding of communist ideology and materialism, and uses it to serve ultra liberalism

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

lol had the same thought, measurehead would be an awesome enforcer.