this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
460 points (94.9% liked)

Political Memes

12018 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It really is a pervasive issue, similar to how Republicans keep ramming pet projects into budget reconciliation bills in the House. We really need legislation that bars bills from containing unrelated items in them.

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’m not from the states so please forgive me if this is incorrect, but I’ve read a “bill” can start out as one thing. Get a load of traction, then be changed last minute to something else entirely just before the vote. Is that true? Seems impossible track if it is

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Check the title of this bill vs the amendment

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/s1318/text

"Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act"

Amendment: "... Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1.Short titles; table of contents (a)Short titles This Act may be cited as the Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act."

[–] mech@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm speechless. I mean it actually makes sense in the context of the archaic US democratic system, but still...

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

they do that alot , the REPUBLICANS did this with NN bills which was actually disguising the TAX CUT of 2017.

So that sounds good in theory, but in practice it is used to prevent anything the judiciary dislikes from being done. Have a single issue bill that all it says is it moves cannabis from class 1 to class 3 controlled substance? Well that affects interstate commerce too so whoopsie can't write that law.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

it will be hard to do that in missouri , the republicans have total control of the state.