this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
388 points (99.2% liked)

memes

21695 readers
2603 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 69 points 6 hours ago (3 children)
[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 44 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They just keep reinventing trains except shittier.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

What if we made the train wide and flat, gave it armor plating, bolted a pair of claws on the front, and let it run sideways?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

why would an individual car “train” that can go anywhere (eg. train tracks on all roads for self driving cars) be shitter than a train that has limited availability and is extremely restrictive in where it can go?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

Because you have to pay a good chunk of a year's salary for one, store it around your house somewhere, and then when you finally do get to use it, there are a million other people with the same idea and you have to compete just for space in which to use it.

And that's before you get to all the maintenance the government has to spend on the paths (and make you pay tax for all that). Oh, and it's incredibly dangerous, so dangerous that it's one of the leading causes of death in the US.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 19 minutes ago

We are talking about an equivalent 'pod/train car', not a car but I'll bite anyway

Have you ever been on a train? It sucks, a bus 10000% more, buses fuckin suck so much, I'm sorry for you to hear this in the echo chamber which features 'fuck cars'.

Like I said, trains and buses have 2 big negatives:

limited availability and is extremely restrictive in where it can go

Trains especially so, my local train would be a 20-30 minute walk away and it goes far south and to the city, if i don't want to go to either of those I'm in for a 5 hour marathon of a trip at best

But we should invest more in trains you might be saying, and again the question goes back to, why would a train be better than a pod/car that can roll around on train tracks

This whole thread took the original meaning and warped it into a circle jerk about trains which is not what the OP was saying

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

it's ~pods~. completely different.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Yes, trains have real throughput.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 5 hours ago

"Trains, but without the tracks."