this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
748 readers
571 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No he didn't
Fuck you.
lol are you an h3 or a epstiny kinda guy?
fuck off
The collar is an airtag holder apparently, not a shock collar
Very obviously an airtag collar, lmfao, who let the kkklein fan in here?
AirTags work fine over long distance, as long as someone's iPhone is nearby it can pretty reliably track objects over quite long distances. There's a reason so many people put them in luggage, or firearm cases. It's also more convenient to check an airtag than a chip.
There's also tons of images of that particular collar from multiple angles, from a different point where he was holding his dog. You can see pretty clearly that it's holding an airtag, and that the "black box" people are saying is the shocker is just an adjustment strap. We can see the airtag in the original video, and do you know of any collars that both hold an airtag, and are shock collars? Because they don't seem to exist, nobody on either r/Hasan or r/lsf has found a model that would match that description.
Anyway, you got banned, so I'm correct by default.
Wouldn't airtags be fallible against thieves? Like the thief could cut the collar and toss it away? Does seem very useful in a lost dog accident scenario though.
Ultimately any anti-theft device is fallible, the point of them is to create deterrence by increasing the hassle and effort/time involved in stealing whatever it is successfully
Which will deter crimes of opportunity and make more professional/targeted thieves consider easier targets
For example with bike locks even super high end ones can eventually be cut with an angle grinder, but that takes time and draws lots of attention, so why not go for a bike with a lock that can be shimmied or has none at all
In the case of an AirTag or another similarish RFID/GPS/wideband/lojack tracker type devices you'd need a Faraday cage large enough to hold the thing, which in the case of say a small electronic device like a phone may not be very hard for an fairly dedicated and decently equipped thief, but to steal a dog I assume you'd need a van with the back compartment Faraday'd and/or a Kennel with the same(I don't actually know how pet implants work so this is just my educated guesses to illustrate my point)
I don't personally own any airtags, or airtag collars so I couldn't really tell you. I'm don't really think pet thieves are particularly common though, and pets usually have tracker implants as well.
pets don't have tracker implants to be clear, they have RFID implants that basically serve as implantable collars with owner info and some sort of id tied to vet records afaik. Not long enough range to be any good for tracking, significantly less than even bluetooth, same tech as cards/fobs that you tap to unlock doors
I ain't reading all that. Please log off.
I've trained bit pits and German shepherds and never had to use a shock collar you are defending animal abuse.
all anyone needs to see of your comment. this is an anti-science position, with very few exceptions dogs of all types are extremely trainable without positive punishment, and Hasan has had his dog for years and trained her very well without doing it himself.
This is nonsense. I've had animals my entire life. Sometimes they're just dramatic. If i'm working, I'm not going to stand up and investigate every little sound. You're reddit brained, pretending that every "good" animal lover will immediately rush over to baby the poor little pup. Jfc, you're sad.
yes you are being anti science right now oh wait you got banned
Virgin accusing your opponent of having informal logical fallacies in their argument vs chad gloating over your opponent losing the argument because they got banned