this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
153 points (82.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25500 readers
1400 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 236 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The headline makes it sound like the "in favour" votes were for death penalty, which is not correct. This was a vote for a moratorium - a temporary suspension - of death penalty.

[–] Saltycracker@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

This now makes more sense. The headline did a shitty job

[–] trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Omg thank you for the explanation I was real worried there for a second

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was wondering how we are somehow in favour when we don't even have it.

(op is a cunt Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi)

[–] nkk@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

If it makes the United States look good it has to be wrong

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago

Thank you I was very confused seeing many of these countries "against"

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes I checked my own country (Denmark) and that is green, and for Denmark it is decidedly illegal to vote for death penalty.
So the vote was probably about making death penalty illegal.

PS:
AFAIK it would be against the Eu treaty to vote for death penalty for ALL EU countries.

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The headline in the image clears up the confusion

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

Not if you don't know what moratorium means (which I didn't before reading the comments)

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I came here to ask about this, because Brazil voting in favor of the death penalty when it doesn't have it did set off some alarms for me

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thought the same looking up Canada.

[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

New Zealand and Iceland lol

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The only people who were confused are the ones who didn't actually read the diagram.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

yeah you could delete the labels altogether and I'd still tell you which color is which vote based on who voted.

for future reference, if you see the US voting with the wartorn, economically devastated, despot-ruled or otherwise suffering nations, or if you see the US voting alone or with Israel, then you can bet that they voted for the worst option.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's no excuse for a misleading headline.

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago

It's not misleading at all...