this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
774 points (99.2% liked)

Futurology

3549 readers
614 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It didn’t go unnoticed in Frankfurt that Visa and Mastercard suspended operations in Russia in March 2022 after the invasion of Ukraine……Thirteen of the 20 countries in the euro have no domestic card scheme. You use an international operator, or you pay in cash."

It hasn't gone unnoticed that the US is threatening to invade an EU country's (Denmark) territory, either. Would a future President Trump or President Vance threaten to shut down European financial infrastructure if it opposes an annexation of Greenland? Who knows, but better to take away that opportunity for leverage.

The plan is that you can link it to your bank account or open a special account at post offices throughout the EU. There will be phone apps for payments and digital Euro debit cards. Visa/Mastercard & Apple/Google Pay typically charge 3% fees; the digital Euro will have none. That will ensure it is speedily adopted by retailers and quickly supplants the US providers. Also worth noting its technology will be 100% European only, leaving zero vulnerability/leverage to non-Europeans.

Digital euro: what it is and how we will use the new form of cash - The European Central Bank is determined to break the US grip on card payments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Eh, it pretty much is. Language is fluid and constantly changing, there isn't really anything "right" or "wrong". What's "correct" in a language is essentially what people speak and write

Sure, you have dictionaries and grammar rules and such, but they're not prescriptive, they're descriptive

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

there isn’t really anything “right” or “wrong”.

I'm familiar with the argument but I disagree with it. Every person learning a language disagrees with it. And every instructor I've had disagrees with it. The only people who seem to agree are the same people who misuse the language.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

That's a very strong use of "every". English isn't my primarily language either, you know

And no, in fact, I've heard most people who have a degree en english, linguistics, whatever, to disagree with your position. Language is how it's used, not what it's supposed to be. Otherwise we would always have had one singular language, forever, and no dialects either

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

Do you always use literally literally, and are you careful not to talk about the enormity of perfectly innocent large things?

Language changes. People make mistakes. Neither is worth getting too upset about.

[–] FrederikNJS@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Soo juu dunt tink deres a wright or rong whey too spel wrods?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 17 hours ago

Depends on your definition, but so long as it's understandable, yeah

I mean, what are dialects, for example?

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

unless your a silly frenchmen, trying to impose order upon chaos

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Can't resist correcting "you're"! Sorry sorry sorry.