this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
310 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26926 readers
2387 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Colorado lawmaker, who pushed for Epstein files release, points to bill’s unanimous passage through US House and Senate

Republican representative Lauren Boebert has fired back at Donald Trump for vetoing a bill that would have funded a drinking water project in her Colorado district, implying the president was playing at political retaliation.

The bill was aimed at funding a decades-long project to bring safe drinking water to 39 communities in Colorado’s eastern plains, where the groundwater is high in salt and wells sometimes unleash radioactivity into the water supply.

Boebert criticized the move, calling the bill “completely non-controversial” and pointed out that it passed the House and Senate unanimously earlier this year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 118 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Override the veto? A unanimously passed bill should be able to do that, and push back at the admin, win win

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They probably have to worry about the credible death threats that Taco will direct at them. The Republican Party is not so much a political party but more like a crime family or a terrorist group.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 56 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The last article I read didn’t even mention the possibility which I couldn’t understand; at least this one does:

It was not immediately clear whether the Republican leaders in Congress would allow a vote to override Trump’s veto in Colorado

I can only assume republicans wouldn’t because they didn’t know they weren’t in step with Trump’s wishes?

It’ll be interesting to see how it goes and how willing Congress is to separate themselves from such an unpopular president.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 44 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

With Trump officially opposed, I assume that Mike Johnson will prevent an override from coming to a vote. That will be fun to watch.

It's kind of shocking to learn that there are places in the United States where radioactive tap water is a thing.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 35 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

3/4 of the US outside major metros should be classified as a developing country. We have many areas that barely have functional plumbing, let alone any other type of developed infrastructure.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The Navajo nation in New Mexico just got widespread electricity in the last 20 years. In other parts of the country, Natives still live without power.

A lot of people don't have any idea how desperate life is for the poorest in this country.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Which is even worse when you know that most of these places were doing pretty solid up until the 1970s-1980s, they've spent 50 to 40 fucking years slowly decaying while the feds and to an extent the states sat on their assess doing nothing. Fun act did you know that The Learning Channel has its roots in Appalachia as a way of educating the masses there. Sure some of them got fucked over by simple inevitably factors like the collapse of the logging industry up in NorCal, but others were fucked over by bad government policies that empowered corporations and fucked over smaller co-ops, independent farms, and small corporate farms.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Fun act did you know that The Learning Channel has its roots in Appalachia as a way of educating the masses there.

Considering what The Learning Channel turned into, that's a perfect microcosm of the sort of shit that's happened to them over the last few decades.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

I’m in my 30s and I, briefly, lived in a house with no running water some years ago. I agree that most people don’t realize how far behind the rural areas are.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

I've been wondering about that myself.