this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
277 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26918 readers
3846 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Colorado lawmaker, who pushed for Epstein files release, points to bill’s unanimous passage through US House and Senate

Republican representative Lauren Boebert has fired back at Donald Trump for vetoing a bill that would have funded a drinking water project in her Colorado district, implying the president was playing at political retaliation.

The bill was aimed at funding a decades-long project to bring safe drinking water to 39 communities in Colorado’s eastern plains, where the groundwater is high in salt and wells sometimes unleash radioactivity into the water supply.

Boebert criticized the move, calling the bill “completely non-controversial” and pointed out that it passed the House and Senate unanimously earlier this year.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] manxu@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

It may be retaliation, but it's probably just as much about the Tina Peters situation as it is about Lauren Boebert. Trump seems to have decided that Colorado Must Be Punished, even though Eastern Colorado is as red Republican as the districts come.

[–] quantumfoam@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

I have a theory that Lauren Boebert doesent actually need glasses but wears them to seem smarter. It isnt working.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Authoritarians who did everything they could to make this dude feel like he should be a literal king are mad that he doesn’t give a fuck what they say. Crazy.

Morons.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No shit, dumbfuck.

Stick to the handjobs. You're better at it than thinking.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

She filed for divorce the month before the theater handy, and she's not currently with the guy she was jacking, so it would seem that she's pretty shit at handjobs.

Kinda sad for someone who was supposedly a cheap escort in Colorado.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Fuck around find out.

This bitch and the rest of the GOP spent the last 10 years on their hands and knees sucking Trump's tiny trumpet (Boebert at a Beetlejuice musical). Then the moment the narcissistic toddler they put into office again gets slight push back, he immediately retaliates.

I garuntee you the dumb fucks who voted Boebert into office will primary her out next cycle. Not because of what I just said, but because she dared to challenge their god emporer who just took away their clean water.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

"But you weren't supposed to retaliate against me"

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

"Who would have thought this spotted apex predator would eat MY face??"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Of course it is retaliation. What else would it be? His claim that it is wasteful or that it's about "fiscal sanity" (lol) [1] is simply not a believable claim. Projects like this are exactly why governments exist. But selfish little baby has to make it all about him.

[1] I love that, even now, the idiotic myth that Republicans and conservatives are somehow the best stewards of money, the economy or business still lingers on. It was a ridiculous notion decades ago and has blown way into the child-like imagination phase at this point. Conservatives and Republicans are always terrible for the economy and terrible at balancing budgets, etc.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah but Conservatives and particularly Republicans are great at spreading a message. It's more important that people believe that Conservatives and Republicans are good stewards of the economy than actually being good stewards. The economy will ebb and flow regardless of what anyone does, so why do anything about it when you can just take credit for the highlights.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

All these assholes who supported this idiot and are now seeing what he is were thoroughly warned. They chose not to listen because "librul says"!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if, in those areas where 50,000 people live, if there are any Taco flags still flying. Their vote for Taco didn't matter since Colorado went blue, but....still. They might want to read the fucking room.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

I drove through rural Georgia this week. Yep, they're everywhere.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 113 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Override the veto? A unanimously passed bill should be able to do that, and push back at the admin, win win

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They probably have to worry about the credible death threats that Taco will direct at them. The Republican Party is not so much a political party but more like a crime family or a terrorist group.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 54 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The last article I read didn’t even mention the possibility which I couldn’t understand; at least this one does:

It was not immediately clear whether the Republican leaders in Congress would allow a vote to override Trump’s veto in Colorado

I can only assume republicans wouldn’t because they didn’t know they weren’t in step with Trump’s wishes?

It’ll be interesting to see how it goes and how willing Congress is to separate themselves from such an unpopular president.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 43 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

With Trump officially opposed, I assume that Mike Johnson will prevent an override from coming to a vote. That will be fun to watch.

It's kind of shocking to learn that there are places in the United States where radioactive tap water is a thing.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 34 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

3/4 of the US outside major metros should be classified as a developing country. We have many areas that barely have functional plumbing, let alone any other type of developed infrastructure.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The Navajo nation in New Mexico just got widespread electricity in the last 20 years. In other parts of the country, Natives still live without power.

A lot of people don't have any idea how desperate life is for the poorest in this country.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Which is even worse when you know that most of these places were doing pretty solid up until the 1970s-1980s, they've spent 50 to 40 fucking years slowly decaying while the feds and to an extent the states sat on their assess doing nothing. Fun act did you know that The Learning Channel has its roots in Appalachia as a way of educating the masses there. Sure some of them got fucked over by simple inevitably factors like the collapse of the logging industry up in NorCal, but others were fucked over by bad government policies that empowered corporations and fucked over smaller co-ops, independent farms, and small corporate farms.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

Fun act did you know that The Learning Channel has its roots in Appalachia as a way of educating the masses there.

Considering what The Learning Channel turned into, that's a perfect microcosm of the sort of shit that's happened to them over the last few decades.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

I’m in my 30s and I, briefly, lived in a house with no running water some years ago. I agree that most people don’t realize how far behind the rural areas are.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago

I've been wondering about that myself.

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

She’s not wrong. It is retaliation. Just not against her

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

When the president does something like this, congress should keep sending it back. Just spam his ass with it.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 34 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No need for that. A veto can be overturned by Congress entirely and a unanimously passed bill should be quite easy to accomplish that with. In a normal functioning democracy, at least.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The GOP members who initially voted bypartisantly (I believe it was a voice-only vote, no exact tally was made) may not want to do a formal override vote and paint themselves as an opponent to their supreme leader.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

Hence my last sentence.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He’ll just use an autopen.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

In addition to the autopan in his bed.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Here's a bet, IF the Congress has the guts to override the cult leader, he tries to use an executive order to prevent the implementation somehow.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The US has to decide if it abides by the rule of law or the rule of executive orders. If it's the latter, Congress is no longer necessary and can be disbanded.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If they disband congress please remove the pensions as waste, fraud, and abuse.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago

And may as well get rid of the courts too.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 28 points 10 hours ago

Ya love to see it.

Keep tearing each other apart, MAGA. This is better than daytime TV.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

She's pretty sharp for the dullest knife in the drawer.

[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How is this helpful? It's important to know about these things.

[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I’m not saying we shouldn’t know about it, I’m using Norm to comment that of course this is retaliation. Everything with Trump is transactional.

I just did it using a one word fictional magazine title. Norm used this gag more times than one, and usually accompanied the graphic with, “Read all about it in this month’s riviting issue of Duh.”