this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
528 points (98.7% liked)

World News

52430 readers
2178 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't understand why the danish officials they even wasted their time to go to Washington to "talk" about this. There's nothing to talk about this.

Have they ever tried to reason with a toddler that's having a tantrum "I want that toy now"? Waste of time.

[–] arendjr@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Simple: if the toddler has found daddy’s gun because the safe was left open… you better try talking before you scare it.

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is not a toddler, this is a guy bigger than you and with lots of guns and friends. Talking is our only option, especially because it means we can also go against the narrative that Denmark cannot defend Greenland.

Which is true in isolation, but that's why we're in NATO and the joint arctic command and have the 1951 deal with the US that you guys can scale up military presence in Greenland at will. Yet it hadn't happened in 20 years, only reductions.

Personally I think we should have gone more into how Biden refused to increase the defense of the arctic region within the agreement, give the trumpists a way to call him names and solve the issue within the agreements we have.

Still, Lars Løkke has been doing the rounds on Fox News and elsewhere to give our perspective, which could influence public opinion and help change the false narratives being spread in the US. From our perspective we had everything to gain from a meeting and very little to lose.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if biden had done all that, musk would have undone it for his orange god

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not the point, though. The point is to try and change the narrative to be more, shall we say, fact-based. And maybe talk to someone less mental than Trump.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good luck finding anyone like that with enough pull to matter

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, that's what our people did yesterday. Even if Vance is a piece of shit he's not deranged like Trump, and Rubio is also someone you can have a productive discussion with as a foreign nation provided, of course, that the racist grandpa in charge of your nation calms down for a second and stops posting lies about Greenland every 30 minutes.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Vance, Rubio and Miller are even worse war mongers and ultra rightwing fascist pieces of shit. They are worse than Trump becuse they are younger and can do more damage for a longer period of time. Trump, all his enablers, toadies, and yes men-need to go.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they're not worse than trump. They don't have the cult of personality that Trump has. They're also not as delusional as trump. They know that they can't take on the entire world and would rather get what they want diplomatically. They're definitely just as evil as trump, yes. But they simply don't have the draw. Which... Fuck me, I don't understand any draw at all.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There will be a critical mass of people (current sycophants) who extend Trumps fascist policies. This bullshit won’t be over when Trunp finally fucks off.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, you're right, but it won't have the momentum that they had before. But Vance doesn't have the "charisma" of trump. That narcissistic vibe of "I'm telling you the truth that others won't" bullshit. Vance is just a guy, but Trump sells it like nobody else can. In their heads they're like "who the fuck is Vance? He's not a billionaire" he may be more evil, but he's not as dangerous.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

True there’s not many who can debase themselves beyond parody like Shittler can.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They have nothing to lose in doing so.

At worst "conversations" delay an American invasion giving more time for Denmark to prepare.

Any half-competent diplomat will ignore "pride" as a consideration for a chance at stopping a war or at least giving their own side's military more time to prepare, with no actual downside (if that fails they get the exact same outcome as if they didn't engage in "conversations").

Also no doubt a lot of "out of the spotlight" work is going into convicing the members of that Administration who are actually intelligent types putting on a "derranged far-right populist" act for Trump and the American Public, that such a move will indirectly be bad for them personally because of the downsides for the people who own them - big American businesses - of turning Europe into an Enemy rather than merely a trade competitor.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did Poland, Austria and France try to reason with Hitler??

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

Kurt Schuschnigg, Austrian Chancellor, went to talk with Hitler in 1938, and under his pressure added Austrian Nazis to his government, for example on the Interior Minister post.

France officially complained about the re-militarization of the Rhineland in 1936, and later about the Anschluss of Austria in 1938.

Poland talked to Hitler and rejected their demands to hand over Danzig in 1937.

So I guess yes, on specific points at specific times. But I'm not sure if that's the kind of thing you meant?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

And what was the point of trying to reason with a war mongering lunatic? He invaded anyway, France capitulated. Lesson being: you cannot appease dictators and wannabe (for now) invaders. And you should never appease fascists.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

To make the US even more isolated.