this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
240 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54075 readers
2038 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The government is considering introducing legislation to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the line of royal succession.

Defence Minister Luke Pollard told the BBC the move - which would prevent Andrew from ever becoming King - was the "right thing to do," regardless of the outcome of the police investigation.

Currently Andrew, the King's brother, remains eighth in line to the throne despite being stripped of his titles, including "prince", last October amid pressure over his ties to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

On Thursday evening, Andrew was released under investigation 11 hours after his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MBech@feddit.dk 91 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The fact that they think making andrew a simple peasent like the rest of us, is an appropriate punishment for raping children, either tells us a lot about how they see us regular people, or a lot about how much they care about children being raped.

[–] ericatty@infosec.pub 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm not from the UK or living there. So grain of salt and all... But I read this not so much as a punishment, but closing a loophole so he can never ever be in a position of royal power or benefits. And it would hold even if he wins in court.

If we in the US had closed some loopholes 2021-24, we would be at least 50% less fucked.

And maybe 90% less if we'd done it after Nixon.

It's not enough. But it's not nothing.

[–] BlueDemon 6 points 1 day ago

In the UK and I largely agree.

We've seen powerful people can get away with things so there will need to be a bulletproof case against him for anything to hold. Building in mitigations for that is a good thing, even if I think it should be targeting the wider systemic issues not just one loser.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If an angry mob had closed a loophole around Richard Nixon's neck after he received his pardon, we probably wouldn't be in the mess we're in today.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thank you for bringing reason to that moronic comment above yours. “This is the whole punishment! WAH!” I’m so sick of reflexive cynicism in ignorance of the facts. It’s like people have forgotten how to put anything in context and want the shortest path to despair no matter what the news is.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Everything I've read about this says that the misconduct in question was sharing state secrets with Epstein.

The child raping doesn't appear to be concerning them.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read an article that said that he hasn’t actually broken any UK laws to do with rape that we know of.

From memory the main points were:

  • Virginia Giuffre was 17 when they met which is above the age of consent in the UK so he can’t get done for having sex with a minor.
  • Had he done what he did now, he’d have broken laws to do with sex trafficking but the laws weren’t strong enough back then so they don’t apply either.

Obviously, what he did was wrong but that doesn’t mean that he can be prosecuted for it.

I’m hoping that there’s stuff that we don’t know about that they’re preparing to prosecute him for.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm assuming that the reason he shared state secrets with Epstein is because Epstein had something on him.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Al Capone didn't go to prison for murder, he went to prison for tax evasion. Do you think it was because Elliot Ness just didn't care about murder?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well, it certainly wasn't because he couldn't implicate the billionaires.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nevertheless, whistleblowers spend their whole life being hunted down by goverments for exposing state secrets that reveal crimes.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Perhaps that's the state secret he's being punished for revealing: all the child rape among the rich and powerful.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah that must really have been a big surprise for Epstein

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I would like to have that much faith in humanity but given that it has only happened now despite this going on for more than a decade, I doubt it. If you witness such a thing and don't reveal it, it is either that you are the victim and afraid, or they have dirt on you, or you are an average individual who realizes that this would be a battle against a network of some of the most powerful individuals in the world and you don't have an epsilon chance. I think he only fits in the second group.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Different parts of the government. Charles has all but kicked him out of the royals themselves. This would just be finishing the job.

Neither group has any real say in prosecution etc. This is just an additional ceremonial "Fuck you for making us look bad!"

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

"They expect one of us in the wreckage, brother"

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You know that the government doesn't conduct criminal investigations?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

God damn. Comment hit hard. No notes. I just wish the people in the US realized that even the monarchs of Britain are being "punished" more than the equivalent rulers of our similar class structures that exist in modern day with just different names. Our "Epstein class" (capitalist class) have less punishment than modern day monarchs.

The punishment of the monarchs is to become a rich capitalist with no titles. The punishment of the capitalist is nothing.