this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
220 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1200 readers
1370 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Exactly!

"Guys" is gender exclusion.

"Nagging" is shaming women for asking someone to do what they committed to do.

"Pussy" is gender bias that women are weak.

It's all bullshit.

For those who defend the use of any of these because we know what they mean, stop being a little shit. Just change! It's not that hard.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Can I call you a dickhead?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Betty White had a great take on "Pussy" forgive me not remembering it correctly, but she joked more than once that it's strange to use that word to call someone weak, those things take a pounding and usually, ask for more!

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I totally agree with her! Call someone balls or scrotum or something. As someone who's old enough to have sat on one once, those fucking things are weak sauce! 😭😭😭

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

I do think calling someone a "scrotum" is an insult, but not one that implies being weak.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Idk, I'm not sure it's really that deep in most modern vernacular. Out of all social issues, being critical of people using slang like this who don't intentionally mean it to be gender exclusive or biased is a choice you can make. I just think there's bigger issues facing women than "guys" and "pussy" slang.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I think anyone making meaningful efforts with material results in those areas probably gets a pass. For everyone else what's their excuse?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It might not be the most pressing issue, but it is one of the ones we have the most direct control over changing. And it's fucking easy to do.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

What I mean is that the vast majority of people using that slang in modern times aren't associating it in the way you're implying. The words virtually have no meaning in those contexts other than, guys = general term for any person present / pussy = being a coward. I get the root of it being sexist, but changing decades of slang when it isn't actually that insulting is how we annoyed everyone. Marc Maron's Panicked special covers this topic pretty well, I feel.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I've always understood pussy (as in afraid, not the vagina meaning) to be related to cats?

I love the "I call everyone dude" shtick being responded with "So you fuck dudes?". Shuts those type up pretty quickly.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

is short for pusillanimous. and yes, my wife is a dude.

[–] paranoid@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

According to the hit 1997 movie Good Burger, we're all dudes

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I like thinking of it as cats.

I used to use dude a ton too. That seems to be a lot less negatively impactful for whatever reason.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nagging doesn't always have to do with commitment.

Hypothetically speaking, if I asked you for a cigarette every 15 seconds that would be considered nagging.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Fair point. Though I've never heard the phrase being used towards a man.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I've usually heard it as pestering if directed at a guy. And it's usually nagging if it's about chores. Although I've also heard pestering directed at women. So it mostly seems chore based.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I've got several male mates who are moany, naggy bastards