this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
1066 points (99.0% liked)

Funny

14079 readers
2055 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

80 pound only? At that size? What, is it filled with sand?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 53 points 2 days ago

Probably cheaper than solid steel, enshittification strikes again

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Ever seen the inside of an Aero bar?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Deceptive marketing. The 80 lb model is the budget model, but the picture shows the much fancier 300 lb model.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, they switched production methods in the 90s to save on manufacturing costs.

Back in the 70s they were made from solid steel

[–] radix@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Solid stainless steel at that weight would be roughly 17 cm per side (assuming a cube), depending on the exact alloy.

There's no perfect reference scale, but the diagonal width of the cube is 60% the width of the drawer (by pixels). My kitchen drawer measures 40.5 cm, so the cube is some 24.5 cm across diagonally. A 17 cm cube would be just over 24 cm. I did a lot of rounding at every step, but it seems to check out pretty darn well.