this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
413 points (99.0% liked)

World News

54583 readers
2801 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

We do know that the US was targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), and the school is in an IRGC compound.

The most likely explanation seems to be that they intended to target an IRGC building, but instead hit the school. Whether that's an issue with the missile's guidance system, the plane's targeting system, outdated maps, or a flaw in whatever process the military is using to select targets, is unknown.

It's of course, possible that the US intentionally bombed a little girls school, but it seems somewhat unlikely. Even the most hawkish war mongerers recognize that randomly slaughtering hundreds of school girls is not going to gain support for your war.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

The school was in the IRGC compound; however that was 10 years ago.

According to satellite imagery, the building in which the school was housed was initially walled within the IRGC compound in 2013 but was then walled off by September 2016.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_airstrike (original source was paywalled)

[the school] had been separated from the military complex and had become a clearly defined civilian institution for more than 10 years.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/3/questions-over-minab-girls-school-strike-as-israel-us-deny-involvement

Currently, the most likely explanation was that AI was used to choose targets and it hallucinated the building being a military target based on old data. Also, the strike was not an accidental miss, because it involved a "double-tab" with a second missile used to kill those who came to provide aid after the first hit.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Well the military won't even acknowledge that a mistake was made so de facto they ARE perfectly fine with massacring children until proven otherwise.

They are now on par with their IDF brothers as far as I'm concerned.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Came here to say basically this. I read that it used to be on the compound, but that it was separated out by a wall and made into a school some time ago - long enough that it means (if it's true) we were using very outdated data, but you can apparently see on Google maps that it used to be part of the compound but now is outside the compound.

So a charitable interpretation is that we used outdated information to bomb what we thought was a military building. And of course there are less charitable interpretations.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The US has worlds most advanced satellites and intel. It's impossible that they didn't know what they were doing. 100% someone even brought it up and they decided to ignore the person.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

It’s impossible that they didn’t know what they were doing.

It's absolutely not impossible.

It's irresponsible and stupid, but it's absolutely not impossible. People and systems can be smart, but often they are very very dumb.

That said, I wouldn't be shocked if nobody could be bothered to remove it from a target list under the idea of claiming it was an accident or something.

But do I think it's impossible the people putting it on the target list didn't know? Not at all. (But do I think it was likely there wasn't someone who knew? Also yes)

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago

I mean, we know for a fact that they used Palantir's system for planning the invasion which is an automated intelligence analysis system.

That alone makes it entirely possible for them to have information and not know about it, on top of all the other existing ways that information can be compartmentalized, or thorough analysis and double checking can be skipped.

The military likes to be seen as competent in media but in reality...