this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
345 points (99.4% liked)

World News

54583 readers
2738 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 minutes ago

Trump: This could have been Iran's tomahawk missile misfiring.

The US has sold 0 Tomahawks to Iran, and it is exclusively available to closest US allies, which are all in the "pure demonic hatred towards" Iran club. Tomahawks further require special launching hardware, including a specific fitting rocket booster, software, and a US satelitte data link for any targetting.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That headline is just irrisponsible. The evidence the NYT dug up was damming enough there's no need to misrepresent it. The video shows a missile hitting the naval base. Given that the school was probably also hit by the US. The Times very helpfully highlights both the naval base and the school in the footage. Not writing a factually incorrect headline for the clicks is not hard here.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Netanyahu taught the US well about killing children.

[–] crazyinferno@lemmy.world 54 points 8 hours ago (19 children)

What the fuck is this even about? No seriously, can someone explain it to me? Is he aiming for terrorists and missing? Like why are they bombing little girls

[–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Transgression through the ultimate taboo: child sacrifice. They do it in front of our eyes to capture attention, share the karmic responsibility, and cultivate learned helplessness.

It was next to a naval base and the Trump administration can't be arsed to check what they are bombing

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago

Because this isn't one of those "woke wars" like we had in the past. If you kill all the kids, they can't grow up and fight for Iran. 🦅💪🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

The AI decreed it so!

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 90 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Anyone giving you a confident answer on this is going to be doing so baselessly. The real answer is "we don't know". Journalists for the world's most well-connected news organizations have been working around the clock just to identify that the missile was even American. That's the state of information right now, and the unfortunate fact is we're just going to have to wait for an answer if one ever comes.

The most you can really know right now is "it didn't need to happen, and it was the US' fault regardless."

I mean both Iran and the U.S. seem to agree it was near a naval base. Most logical conclusion is that they just missed, whether it be from someone thinking they had the coordinates right from outdated information, someone being dumb and picking the wrong side of the compound, or simply the missile not being as accurate as people want to admit.

At best it was negligence, at worst it was sending a message by intentionally doing it to strike fear.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 24 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I suspect that the intent is to ensure that the war goes on as long as possible by creating circumstances in which the Iranians will never stop fighting. Israel and the US need a constant state of war to protect their administrations and military industries. Doing things like this means that there will be no peace efforts any time soon. That is so obvious that is pretty much has to be the intent here.

EDIT: Worth noting that the US and Israel have actually struck MULTIPLE schools, hospitals, and dense residential structures. Whatever the reason, it is absolutely NOT an accident.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Here's one attempt to explain: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2026/03/joy-at-death-and-destruction/ (Craig Murray isn't some crackpot pulling thoughts out of thin air, he's a former British ambassador and fairly famous whistleblower).

[–] crazyinferno@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you, this actually helps paint a picture of what's going on. I see now that the us has become nazi germany. Question is whether I should move to Europe now or after I finish my masters in June. lol

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

If you can get out now do it, although at this point there are few safe havens, Europe is about to get hit hard economically if not worse with escalations from Russia now that the US is fighting a checks notes 6 front global war

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

We do know that the US was targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), and the school is in an IRGC compound.

The most likely explanation seems to be that they intended to target an IRGC building, but instead hit the school. Whether that's an issue with the missile's guidance system, the plane's targeting system, outdated maps, or a flaw in whatever process the military is using to select targets, is unknown.

It's of course, possible that the US intentionally bombed a little girls school, but it seems somewhat unlikely. Even the most hawkish war mongerers recognize that randomly slaughtering hundreds of school girls is not going to gain support for your war.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The school was in the IRGC compound; however that was 10 years ago.

According to satellite imagery, the building in which the school was housed was initially walled within the IRGC compound in 2013 but was then walled off by September 2016.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_airstrike (original source was paywalled)

[the school] had been separated from the military complex and had become a clearly defined civilian institution for more than 10 years.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/3/questions-over-minab-girls-school-strike-as-israel-us-deny-involvement

Currently, the most likely explanation was that AI was used to choose targets and it hallucinated the building being a military target based on old data. The strike was not an accidental miss, because it involved a "double-tab" with a second missile used to kill those who came to provide aid after the first hit.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Well the military won't even acknowledge that a mistake was made so de facto they ARE perfectly fine with massacring children until proven otherwise.

They are now on par with their IDF brothers as far as I'm concerned.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Came here to say basically this. I read that it used to be on the compound, but that it was separated out by a wall and made into a school some time ago - long enough that it means (if it's true) we were using very outdated data, but you can apparently see on Google maps that it used to be part of the compound but now is outside the compound.

So a charitable interpretation is that we used outdated information to bomb what we thought was a military building. And of course there are less charitable interpretations.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The US has worlds most advanced satellites and intel. It's impossible that they didn't know what they were doing. 100% someone even brought it up and they decided to ignore the person.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

I mean, we know for a fact that they used Palantir's system for planning the invasion which is an automated intelligence analysis system.

That alone makes it entirely possible for them to have information and not know about it, on top of all the other existing ways that information can be compartmentalized, or thorough analysis and double checking can be skipped.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

It’s impossible that they didn’t know what they were doing.

It's absolutely not impossible.

It's irresponsible and stupid, but it's absolutely not impossible. People and systems can be smart, but often they are very very dumb.

That said, I wouldn't be shocked if nobody could be bothered to remove it from a target list under the idea of claiming it was an accident or something.

But do I think it's impossible the people putting it on the target list didn't know? Not at all. (But do I think it was likely there wasn't someone who knew? Also yes)

The military likes to be seen as competent in media but in reality...

[–] axh@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Well... You know, Trump has a complicated relationship with little girls.

If you want an educated guess: they were probably letting some LLM do target selection.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you ask MAGA, "it's so the Democrats can whine about it."

A realistic answer would be that they are taking a leaf out of the IDF's book and are being cruel just for cruelty's sake.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

holy shit is that what they’re saying??? murdering hundreds of innocent children to… own the libs???

how can someone have such little regard for human life??? privilege and entitlement are a murderous poison

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's not to own the libs, but to terrorize the Iranian population into surrendering. Trump does admire Putin and his playbook.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 minutes ago

oh i know this is the goal, but the fact that people can defend those murders and this is how they do it, fucking sickening

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

“shock and awe” (and profit. it’s always profit.)

There are several possible reasons that may not cover 100% regardless.

  1. Out dated target information. The structures might have been something else at sometime but have changed with little to no intel in the region.
  2. For our technical might, we still fuck up a lot. Think of competent your coworkers are, now give them access to heavy ordinance.
  3. It's intentional. From the attack on the desalination plant they may just be in the process of causing death and misery because they revel in it. Hegseth has said no more "woke wars" whatever that means.
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The terrorists here are Israel and the US

[–] notabot@piefed.social 4 points 7 hours ago

We know they want the Iranian people to rise up, overthrow their government, and welcome the US forces as glorious liberators, (IMHO the probabilities are maybe, possibly, no chance), so I wonder if they're trying to cause as much harm as possible so people will go "if we just overthrow our government, the US will stop hurting us". It would be psycopathic of the US to think so, but I have seen no evidence to suggest that makes it impossible.

Of course, now that they're using "AI" they get to blame that for any targeting "mishaps" that become a liability.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Well, the actual NYT article has the headline

U.S. Tomahawk Hit Naval Base Beside Iranian School, Video Shows

The school appears to be part of the same compound as the naval base. Presumably someone or something thought it was part of that base.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I heard the school was built on former military land. So could be a case of very outdated information.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Doesn't change much does it?

Whenever I park my car, I usually check if there's a bunch of innocent schools girls in the way first.

I'd like to think that bombs are thrown around a little more carefully than how I park my car.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's an explanation, not an excuse.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 hour ago

I know. I just find it hard to believe.

The largest and most expensive military on Earth shouldn't be that incompetent.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We don’t know if it was a mistake or not, and we still do not have proof who was the attacker.

If it was done by mistake: Mistakes can happen easily, especially when the processes are fresh and everything is chaotic. Those mistakes can happen on all levels, from intelligence to the person actually shooting.

If it was done on purpose: propaganda is a big weapon and there can be multiple motivations doing an attack like that. Non of them include ethical standards, international law or morals. War sucks always.

[–] tla@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The missile is confirmed by various experts as a Tomahawk Cruise missile. Iran doesn't have any Tomahawks, so Trump's claim that the Iranians did it is ridiculous. I guess that leaves the USA and Israel.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Oh, this is news for me, thank you for mentioning it!

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

One explanation I heard was that it was very close to a naval base and almost all the students were kids of high ranked officers. They killed their kids to send them a message.

I can't find the video in the article to confirm, but I also heard it was double tapped.