this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
361 points (98.9% liked)

politics

28932 readers
2312 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In another round of late-night social media posts, Donald Trump attacked the Supreme Court for not overturning his loss in the 2020 presidential election — and tried to pressure the court to rule his way in future election cases.

Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump, but this one was particularly alarming for its scope and the criticism it directed against the nation’s highest court, where six out of nine justices are conservatives and three are Trump appointees.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 43 points 1 day ago (9 children)

There has to be some point where the congress critters decide this guy is just too unhinged to be in power, right?

No, they don't care. They just try to make as many millions as they can and if the country descends into anarchy they can go live in Europe with their wealth and connections.

[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fact that this line appears not to be crossed already is the single most damaging aspect for the US

[–] errer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The line was absolutely crossed a few months into his first term.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago

Emoluments Clause at 12:01 PM ET on January 20th, 2017.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. Can you imagine getting in the Obama tan suit days and having an administration try 1/100th of the crap this one is doing? It's amazing how trump has normalized high treason and rampant corruption.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's just highlighting what was already true. Rich people can do what they like because they control the government and they have class solidarity.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago

Worse, they control the industry and the media.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We can excuse the sexual assault (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the racism (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the child rape (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse hating the poor (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the ableism (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the corruption (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the misogyny (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the ineptitude (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse another pointless Middle East war (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse destroying the social fabrics (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the backstabbing on long standing allies (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse dragging the country into economic turmoil (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the violations of the Constitution (in fact we encourage it)

  • Republicans
[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Needs to be a full page spread in every major newspaper.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

In other words, "Principled Conservatives".

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 17 hours ago

If he had hired goons gut their families on live TV, maybe

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Problem is most of the congress has empowered Trump too much, so if they step out against him, they are going to be equally implicated.

At this point, it is ride or die for them.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Or both?

Both is ~~good~~ acceptable

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can’t ride and die. That’s like having your cake and eating it too.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

The one can end the other. That’s acceptable.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Traitors gonna treason.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally no, he could start dragging congress people out and shooting them dead in public and the GOP would cover him for it. Say it's too soon to discuss between rounds. Especially if he leaves the GOP for last, at which point the dead are declared RINOs and ignored.

Susan Collins would be concerned though, you can count on that.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Surely that point has long passed?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Right!?!

RIGHT!?!???

😞