this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

Movies & TV

23722 readers
99 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago

One Battle After Another

Deserves the ranking, entertaining and in many ways provocative and familiar. And as someone who has a decent grasp of security culture - painful at many parts. If one observes, there were many many many slip-ups from many people - and the antagonists didn't even use many of them.

opsec rants: partial spoilers, don't open unless you've watchedJust from memory, wasn't taking notes:

  • "Leaving DNA at a scene" (euphemism), selfishly delaying escape to have sex during operations, and other extreme unseriousness
  • Panicked speeding escape from bank heist, crashing through many cars, drawing attention to themselves and generating dozens of witnesses to the getaway cars (rule of thumb: commit one crime at a time)
  • Mr. Pyrotechnics didn't rig the house to blow. Maybe that's too extreme of a precaution, but it would disrupt enemy efforts and possibly decrease their numbers, but also disrupt evidence gathering later (see - martial arts ad, calendar)
  • Pat ignoring codewords and openly sharing sensitive info on the phone. Codewords aren't an excellent tool, especially one like that which a state eavesdropper can probably crack after a few calls, but if they're there for a reason, you don't just work around them on an untrusted line, even in an emergency. Imagine being a fed who finds this call log (through the unencoded keywords, or just tapping a known node of a political social network). Even Comrade Josh dropped the facade, no more plausible deniability for the hotline. Willa has it right - if someone doesn't countersign, terminate the exchange. Is Pat getting to the rendezvous worth the damage they potentially did to all the other operatives?
  • Pat being extremely open with the curious Sensei Carlos. I know they have some history, but what if Carlos was interrogated like many others were? For example, that music signal is a "trust someone with your life, no questions asked" key, among other didn't-need-to-know things like disclosing membership of the French 75. Over a decade of protection work down the drain. Who needs a truth serum when we have recreational drugs? We know from history that even close people break or slip - don't share secrets to anyone unless it's truly necessary for them to know.
  • lol phone (definitely should have known better after recognizing the seriousness of the situation in/after the school escape)
  • Carlos making leads during the hospital getaway: "Let's do a selfie. [...] Siri, Sisters of the Brave Beaver". For someone who is head of some serious operations, this is just a sad 1-2 combo. Disclosing the location of a secret compound is insane (although I believe Pat could have also been captured with directions?)

meme