this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
290 points (87.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38907 readers
4243 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 36 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (5 children)

IMO peaceful protests do have an impact; however, there is a point where those stop working and more direct action needs to be taken. Problem is people don't want to out of fear of the police.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately our lives need to become shit enough that being beat or shot is no longer a deterrent.

[–] gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, but if it does reach that tipping point, it's going to get very ugly.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

MLK’s strategy only worked because the powers that be understood that Malcom X was the alternative.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

MLKs strategies were effective because they were novel and the state hadn't built up the tools to deal with them. They had been caught off guard.

The state long ago developed strategies to deal with protest including the use of media for narrative management, and the long term the socialization of "peaceful protest as the only acceptable form of protest" among left wing populations.

The state adapted and evolved to be able to safely ignore peaceful protest, and also ran a long term propaganda campaign that "peaceful protest" is the only form of protest acceptable, and even further, has propagandized to convince people it's the only form of protest even possible or effective.

MLK was effective because the state hadn't dealt with those strategies before. They adapted to deal with those strategies, then built funnels for grievances to focus exclusively on the tactics they had adapted to be able to ignore.

[–] zout@fedia.io 9 points 21 hours ago

MLK's strategy worked because he had a big legal team as part of his organistation. He could provoke an arrest (making for photo ops), and have his legal team ready to fight the case they had prepared in advance. His strategy always involved getting sued over something and then fight it in court.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 21 hours ago

looking around at things in 2026

Did it really work?

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Problem is people don’t want to out of fear of the police

Is this not the point of the whole thing lol

That's like saying in 1939 "I would resist harder if not for the Nazi officers... guess I'll comply a few more years."

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

Exactly. It's the crux of the issue. Peaceful protests should work, and sometimes do; however, there is always the ability of the authorities to just... ignore because they have various police forces to maintain the status quo (maintain order).

Then what? What is the next course of action? Voting didn't work, peaceful protests didn't work... what next? If reforming the current system hasn't worked for the last century and more, what is the alternative?

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Peaceful protests only make an impact when they turn violent. And usually only when the Govt. initiates the violence. Right now the Govt. WANTS the violence because then they can declare martial law and stop the midterm elections.

[–] boopickle1310@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Women got the right to vote through non-violence. This is completely untrue that nonviolence has done nothing. If the numbers get big enough, the government will begin to be afraid of us, again. The billionaires might be afraid again if we show up in the millions to their front door.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Ugh, look up the suffragettes - their was 100% violence

Imma leave this here from Wikipedia

Suffragette violence refers to the militant actions taken by members of the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) in the early 20th century, including bombings and arson, aimed at gaining women's suffrage in the UK. This campaign, which lasted from 1912 to 1914, resulted in casualties and was viewed by many as a form of terrorism, ultimately leading to a complex legacy regarding the suffrage movement's effectiveness and public perception

This led directly to the US women’s right to vote movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah I'm sure the suffragettes mail bombing campaign and assassination program had nothing to do with it.

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

not so much police, but the fact that leaked documents that are all but official government documents showed that they're activiely planning for protests to turn violent so they can go full Stalin and start shooting, arresting, and executing people on the grounds of "fuck you that's why"