this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
262 points (86.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38907 readers
4118 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Oh so BLM didn't happen huh?

In some cities people literally set fucking buildings on fire, and guess what? It didn't change shit. Mindless fires, looting, and destruction of property doesn't mean you'll magically get the government to care. It gets all the local mom-and-pops to close and the grocery stores to leave, giving you mothing but a food desert.

I'm so fucking tired of all the EU people on Lemmy making fun of people for at least getting out there and showing others we should care. Senless violence will not solve all of our issues. Someone could shoot Trump tomorrow and sure, maybe we'd get Civil War (so fun am I right!), but that doesn't mean his chain of succession won't exist. Are we going to kill the entire fucking cabinet then?

Also isn't the UK struggling with Isreal protest arrest right now? Where's their mass violence and fires? Why don't we care about them?

I'm getting fucking tired of coming onto this site to see endless outsiders eagerly jeering at us to risk our lives in a random blaze of glory that will lead nowhere without a true guide and rebellion. The gun fetishsts are not the ones who hate Trump. They fucking love him. Us normal people hate the idea of touching them. The only people willing to do a suicide mission are those who have nothing to lose, and most people aren't there. Go be Luigi, and watch how you either die or get stuck in jail limbo for decades. What did shooting the CEO change? Absolutely nothing. Our healthcare system still sucks, because this isn't a violence problem, it's a legislation issue.

Should we make fun of HK protesters for being peacful? Iran got a dictator blown to bits and is still going to be in hell.

I genuinely will be curious to see how all of these armchair rebels react if there's ever a case of mass government corruption in their country in a decade or so. I don't want for anyone to be in a situation like this, but we'll see if you keep that same attitude up when it's your lives on the line.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Have people already forgotten the summers of 2016 and 2018? I can promise you Americans can riot with the best of them.

The difference is they have the capability to completely censor riots now.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 27 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's an inflammatory comment but it's one worth repeating: a protest with a permission slip is a parade.

There is one obvious permission structure and one non obvious permission structure at play here. The first and most obvious permission structure at play here is the state, and what the state is willing to accept in the form of protest. The other, less obvious permission structure, is what we as a collective society are willing to accept and consider valid as a form of protest.

We often focus on the first without acknowledging the latter. There are some absolutely legitimate criticisms to be made of protests which seek permission from the state.

What we don't often talk about is that protest, for it to be effective, also needs to make the other members of society around you uncomfortable. the discomfort is the point, and modern protests in the US are done in a way to reduce discomfort and inconvenience for all, both the government and the protesters, but also society. And if the discomfort created isn't so bad, protest can and will be readily ignored.

The elephant in the room is that while peaceful protest worked, it was effective in a time where it was fairly novel and society didn't have great ways of compartmentalizing it. The state and society adapted tools to be able to manage the inconveniences created from protest in such a way that protest is basically 100% ineffective in the US.

If a protest is safe, it can be safely ignored. If a protest doesn't inconvenience people in a manner that causes them to change behavior, it has no teeth.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 55 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I think too many people are too self conscious to join a protest. I think they're (protests) belittled too much to feel impactful, and a lot of that lies in the division falsely created by the media.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 78 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

all by design. Notice how the No Kings protests happen on a Saturday? you know...when the majority of people have time off work. that's the problem. When employment is tied to healthcare and the fact you can't take time off from it to, like, take back your country combined with many states being at will employment states....yeah it's all by design to prevent the mass populace from rebelling.

For these protests to REALLY be effective they need to jam up downtown cores at 8am on a weekday and last throughout the day. but they never will. and if they did the turn out would be minimal. My point is you CAN peacefully protest but when it's on a weekend then no one cares. you're not hindering anything.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 hours ago

Part of the reason why the protests in 2020 were so big and lasted so long was because if quarantine. A lot of people got laid off. They didn't have jobs to go to, so there was nothing stopping them from protesting.

When the AI bubble bursts and the recession/depression goes full swing with mass layoffs, I think we'll see more protests that last weeks or months at a time...

That right there is a big fucking part of why I feel such a deep sense of ennui about the likely outcome of any protests, and any impact it might have on our political system. So much money and effort and time has been exerted to convert the American economic system into a neofeudal serfdom that it’s going to take a genuine catastrophe for anything to change meaningfully - and by change meaningfully, I mean “reverse wealth disparity and rampant corporatism”.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 12 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

This is a weird statement coming less than 24 hours after the largest protest in the history of the country.

[–] MapleFawn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like the point is less about size and more about the methods. I think it aims at the issue highlighted by an other comment that this protest while good doesn’t really disrupt the system.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

For real, the articles I've seen about it from the other side of the pond have looked almost dystopianly Hunger Games-esque. Almost like the media was giving them a gold star for all the pretty photo-ops they'd supplied them, where no property was damaged, no police showed up, and nobody got hurt. It was kinda sickening.

Even the most lackluster, neighborhood block protest in France or the UK captures the outrage of the people more potently. Going off what I've seen, Americans seem awfully comfortable right now.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

Don’t mistake awareness for comfort. We catch a lot of heat for our ridiculous levels of gun violence, but living around that many guns, in a nation where cops, ICE, and counter-protestors armed with assault rifles are just looking for an excuse to unload, you learn how far to push without causing a situation where strays are flying into the crowd. At Defund the Police and Pride we’ve had jacked up pick-ups filled with armed red necks roll coal and brandish on us in full view of the cops; nothing happened. At BLM one of them popped a shot off to spook the crowd; caught, claimed he accidentally turned the safety off, no charges. How many videos are there of monster trucks plowing into crowds? Plus, the new tactic is to show up covered in cameras, incite a fight, play victim, get the protestor arrested. Our courts are theirs and our prison system is egregiously punitive. And don’t doubt that a lot of us protesting are legally carrying. You really don’t want to see an American protest turn into a shootout, and the closer it gets to becoming one the more cautious we are about setting it off without a safety plan.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Until the other issue highlighted in that comment - that the majority of people can't afford to take the time off work to do something disruptive - is solved, I'm not sure how we get from here to there, unfortunately.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

It's a problem that will start to solve itself as the economy collapses 😕, though that's when things start to get interesting.

I'm tired of living in interesting times.

I honestly barely heard a peep about it.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What protest? Apparently I live under a rock, didn't see anything about it.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 4 points 18 hours ago

Just search for 'no kings march 2026' and you'll get pages of results.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I see the propaganda is working, soon no one will remember Blair mountain or any labor history!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago

I'm just positive the blair mountain signs were some real zingers

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Protests aren't the only thing that activists in the US are doing. It's not an either or situation.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 34 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

IMO peaceful protests do have an impact; however, there is a point where those stop working and more direct action needs to be taken. Problem is people don't want to out of fear of the police.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately our lives need to become shit enough that being beat or shot is no longer a deterrent.

[–] gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, but if it does reach that tipping point, it's going to get very ugly.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

MLK’s strategy only worked because the powers that be understood that Malcom X was the alternative.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

MLKs strategies were effective because they were novel and the state hadn't built up the tools to deal with them. They had been caught off guard.

The state long ago developed strategies to deal with protest including the use of media for narrative management, and the long term the socialization of "peaceful protest as the only acceptable form of protest" among left wing populations.

The state adapted and evolved to be able to safely ignore peaceful protest, and also ran a long term propaganda campaign that "peaceful protest" is the only form of protest acceptable, and even further, has propagandized to convince people it's the only form of protest even possible or effective.

MLK was effective because the state hadn't dealt with those strategies before. They adapted to deal with those strategies, then built funnels for grievances to focus exclusively on the tactics they had adapted to be able to ignore.

[–] zout@fedia.io 9 points 18 hours ago

MLK's strategy worked because he had a big legal team as part of his organistation. He could provoke an arrest (making for photo ops), and have his legal team ready to fight the case they had prepared in advance. His strategy always involved getting sued over something and then fight it in court.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

looking around at things in 2026

Did it really work?

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Problem is people don’t want to out of fear of the police

Is this not the point of the whole thing lol

That's like saying in 1939 "I would resist harder if not for the Nazi officers... guess I'll comply a few more years."

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Exactly. It's the crux of the issue. Peaceful protests should work, and sometimes do; however, there is always the ability of the authorities to just... ignore because they have various police forces to maintain the status quo (maintain order).

Then what? What is the next course of action? Voting didn't work, peaceful protests didn't work... what next? If reforming the current system hasn't worked for the last century and more, what is the alternative?

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Peaceful protests only make an impact when they turn violent. And usually only when the Govt. initiates the violence. Right now the Govt. WANTS the violence because then they can declare martial law and stop the midterm elections.

[–] boopickle1310@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Women got the right to vote through non-violence. This is completely untrue that nonviolence has done nothing. If the numbers get big enough, the government will begin to be afraid of us, again. The billionaires might be afraid again if we show up in the millions to their front door.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Ugh, look up the suffragettes - their was 100% violence

Imma leave this here from Wikipedia

Suffragette violence refers to the militant actions taken by members of the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) in the early 20th century, including bombings and arson, aimed at gaining women's suffrage in the UK. This campaign, which lasted from 1912 to 1914, resulted in casualties and was viewed by many as a form of terrorism, ultimately leading to a complex legacy regarding the suffrage movement's effectiveness and public perception

This led directly to the US women’s right to vote movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Yeah I'm sure the suffragettes mail bombing campaign and assassination program had nothing to do with it.

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 17 hours ago

not so much police, but the fact that leaked documents that are all but official government documents showed that they're activiely planning for protests to turn violent so they can go full Stalin and start shooting, arresting, and executing people on the grounds of "fuck you that's why"

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 12 points 16 hours ago

Totally. US citizens are armed to the teeth and the best they can do is knit hats.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They still don't have color photography in Europe?

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

We only don't have it during protests because people keep burning the colors away with trash fires or Molotov cocktails. Unfortunately the Molotov - proof camera never materialized after Nokia went bankrupt long ago.

[–] Nagrom@lemmy.ca 8 points 16 hours ago

I laughed out loud because it’s true.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It took a depression to get people’s asses in gear last time

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

Well then it appears we're in luck!

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 9 points 17 hours ago

Too many people in the US keep pushing the idea that "violence never solves anything" when the opposite is absolutely true. If you want positive long lasting change, then you're gonna have to get your hands dirty with more than just glue and paint.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

They're doing more than you! What have you done?! ReeeEEEEEE