this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
134 points (94.7% liked)

Political Memes

11479 readers
2013 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Akh@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Texas is a massive welfare state that lives on federal contracts

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re not wrong. Was looking at this for a different reason today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_OECD_regions_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

Texas is bolstered by their hill country tech sector, gulf port refineries and west Texas crude. The rest is a lot of prairie land and mountain ranges. What surprises me is that Texas has lower productivity per capita than Alaska (another oil rich, wide open spaces state), and Nebraska, which I can only assume one man is doing some very heavy lifting there.

Many of the more large-population liberal states have higher gdp, even with their typically higher taxes.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 7 points 1 day ago

This chart you shared identifies Texas as having the 44th highest GDP per capita out of every region in the entire world out of 454 regions, which is actually really good. It's especially good given how much rural land Texas includes, where an entire state's per capita GDP is being compared to much smaller urban regions like Luxembourg, Warsaw, and London.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I live in Texas. I love where I live, and also fuck this place, but either way what you're saying just isn't true. Sure, there are a number of defense contractors plus NASA and military bases operating in Texas, but between energy, healthcare, education, tourism, tech, and over 50 Fortune 500 companies, Texas's economy is actually really diverse. California has a ton of military bases and defense contractors too, because like Texas they have the workforce to pull it off

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I lived in Texas for 30 years, I left 10 years ago and have no desire to go back. Apart from texmex klobasnek and a few other things, I don’t miss it at all.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

I think people underestimate the differences between living in a deep red state vs a deep blue state.

It's like night and day. I would never voluntarily step foot in a red state again for the rest of my life if I don't need to.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Fuckin hell growing up in ohio it was a swing state, and I remember watching it slowly get worse and worse before I left for the PNW. The busses come with reasonable frequency here, and they even go to suburbs beyond a single commuter bus. Portland and Seattle both even have light rail systems (Columbus adamantly rejects the premise of building a fucking train, despite being quite blue). When I was unemployed they didn't care that I had savings when I applied for medicaid, just that I wasn't earning too much in interest on them to qualify (ohio rejected me for having less money in savings). There are still problems and bigots and I don't love everything about here, but I feel safe and I feel like this place actually is attempting to improve while Ohio just kinda started giving up when manufacturing went away and is convinced that trying to improve things will only make them worse, which the state legislature has fostered.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I’m in a pretty purple state now, there isn’t a blue state that really interests me in moving too. Far too many of them have unreasonable taxes or bad weather or both. And they few outliers like Oregon and Washington are too expensive for me to attempt to move to.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

For people who don’t continue down the thread, here is the proof suggested by another user and found by me:

https://rockinst.org/issue-areas/fiscal-analysis/balance-of-payments-portal/

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Meanwhile WA and NH are just getting their money back

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You have no idea how much of all those industries you just named get corporate welfare or other federal grants. Texas is a net tax sink not payer to the federal government

[–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is your evidence of this?

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Rockefeller Institute of Government and analyses by the Tax Foundation. Texas consistently receives more in federal funding than it contributes in federal taxes. In 2023, for every dollar Texans paid to the federal government, the state received approximately $1.20 in return. This net inflow of federal dollars places Texas among the states that benefit most from federal redistribution.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Have a link to these? All the sources I see indicate Texas pays more in federal taxes than it receives back in aid

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Not OP; here’s the most likely link.

https://rockinst.org/issue-areas/fiscal-analysis/balance-of-payments-portal/

And here is a screenshot of the relevant data

Texas clocks in at $1.21 receivers for every $1 sent to the federal government.