this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
598 points (95.3% liked)

Comic Strips

23005 readers
2862 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedFrank24@piefed.social 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I dunno... You can be straight and still consider someone of the same sex attractive, just not so attractive that you'd want to sleep with them.

I'm ace and I find both Tom Ellis and Jenna Coleman attractive, but that doesn't mean I want to sleep with them, or anyone really.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What does "ace" mean in this context?

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Asexual, meaning they experience little to no sexual attraction.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

So, if no one experiences sexual attraction to me, what does that make me? Anti-sexual? Axes, maybe?

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No, FenrirIII, it just makes you ugly.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 17 hours ago

creating a new sexual orientation based on whether people are attracted to you as an individual is like a whole new level of narcissism 😅

why no, I'm not a FenrirIII-sexual, but my friend is (she's a slut)

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Stupid question time: Does the fact that you're ace omit the gay/straight spectrum entirely, or would you still place yourself on it somewhere?

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 7 points 19 hours ago

Not having sexual attraction to any people doesn't preclude romantic attraction. I'm ace and panromantic. What OP described is aesthetic attraction

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Some aces have a position on the gay/straight spectrum.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Aesthetic attraction vs Sexual attraction.

You can find someone visually appealing without also finding them sexually appealing.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 6 points 21 hours ago

The two are not mutually exclusive.

Sexual attractiveness also doesn’t mean sexual drive. One doesn’t need to be gay to understand that a man is sexually attractive in the way they find compelling. A desire to look good is all it takes.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

We used to call people who omitted the spectrum and were attracted to other people regardless pansexual.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

I mean. women don't necessarily have to be more attrative than another to go sleep with them.

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Agree 100%. I think the guy in the comic got his award prematurely. The rest of the sentence after "but" matters.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 23 hours ago

"I'm 100% straight, but... I'd totally suck Paul off if he asked."

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Tom Ellis is the Lucifer actor, for anyone wondering.

I agree with Coleman though, though I am most probably not ace.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'm 100% straight, but I don't think being attracted to Tom Ellis should count.

(My use of "I'm 100% straight" here is meant solely as a humorous callback to the comic.

But yeah, Tom Ellis is charming as fuck with wide appeal.)

Well yeah but specifically sexual attraction -- generic attraction can be anything that makes you want to spend time with a person but we're talking about sexual attraction here