this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
883 points (97.0% liked)

News

36270 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 142 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Anyone else would have been arrested and jailed by now.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And his fan boys and girls all whine about him being picked on. We really are being played with.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably.

The judges in Trump's various cases have to walk a fine line between justice being served and accusations of being politically aggressive against a high profile defendant.

Accusations which could derail the case and do even more damage to trust in the judiciary and the overall rule of law.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

accusations of being politically aggressive against a high profile defendant

Republicans already launch those accusations regardless of whether or not they have merit. Worrying about what Republicans are going to say is a losing game.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Well it's more about a mistrial. Anything that isn't clear cut is going to be grounds for an appeal.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Republicans should be written off, but Enlightened Centrists matter (unfortunately). You want to keep the merit of the claims low enough that centrists can't latch onto it for "both sides" purposes.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The centrists argue in bad faith all the time and say stupid shit without merit too, they're just smarter about it.

It's time for us to ignore and dismiss them the way we do right-wingers.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

OK. Now we've ignored and dismissed 60% of the population. How do you propose to do that and still advance policy in a democracy?

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Rather than placating the right, you work too ridicule and humiliate them - make their stances unreasonable to sympathise with, let alone adopt.

Then you've got to deal with the civility politics backlash, but how much has that ever really hurt the GOP - their base love it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

Now that I can get behind.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe -2 points 2 years ago

By not listening to you basically.

Here, watch.

[–] ZhaoYadang@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

And he’s the kind of person who’ll just keep stepping further over the line until the hammer finally comes down. Judges know this type, and they usually throw them in jail sooner because they know the violations will only get worse.

But I doubt this guy’s ever going to jail. He’s rich and famous, so…different rules.