238
submitted 10 months ago by some_guy to c/news@lemmy.world

Jennifer Crumbley, 45, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the deadly school shooting carried out by her then-15-year-old son in 2021.

[…]

In the trial, Jennifer Crumbley testified that while “I don’t think I’m a failure as a parent” and “wouldn’t have” done anything differently in how she parented her son, she felt regret for what he did.

It's about time a parent is held responsible. Maybe this will finally start moving a needle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

I personally think maybe we should consider subsidizing gun-safe purchases so people are incentivized to buy a gun safe by making them more affordable to first time gun-buyers.

Guns are pretty expensive on their own, and much like people buying a fancy motorcycle but cheaping out on helmet and chaps, people will skip the gun safe if it costs more than they can afford including the gun.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Or maybe they have to buy a safe and or prove they already have one before they are allowed to buy a gun. We can't take away the right to own a gun but we sure as hell can make sure it's safely stored.

[-] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That's sort of the situation in the UK, or at least where I'm at.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

The UK also doesn't allow pistols anyway. Which is the first kind of gun that most people buy.

[-] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Not strictly true.

Pistols are allowed in Northern Ireland, and are subject to the same licences and regulations as rifles and shotguns.

And there are some pistols that are designed to comply with regulations and can be bought.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A better option sure, but I've been alive in the USA long enough to know that's a non-starter. We're absolutely the country of "You have the freedom to ignore safety precautions because there aren't laws against being a complete fucking idiot and a danger to other people."

Sorry I was trying to live in the dystopian reality we exist in for a moment.

I don't exactly have solutions for what to do about conservatives always arguing in bad faith, so my suggestion reflected a political reality, which is that our system of government treats their lack of education and arguing in bad faith valued as the same as educated good faith arguments. It's wrong, it's stupid, it's backwards, and it's so broken we're literally having to have courts decide whether a President can be a King, actually. But it's the system as it exists, not as much as we wish it wasn't a bunch of bullshit crafted by white slave owners who wanted to protect the aristocracy by only allowing land-owning white men to vote. We're not exactly starting with a system that wasn't a pile of dogshit to begin with over here.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

We’re absolutely the country of “You have the freedom to ignore safety precautions because there aren’t laws against being a complete fucking idiot and a danger to other people.”

For sure, but at least holding them responsible when someone gets hurt or killed is a start. It’s too late to prevent “being a danger to other people”, but maybe some will learn not to “ignore safety precautions”. It’s pretty minimal justice for someone’s life, but it’s a step

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I’m pretty sure there have been such programs for trigger locks

[-] yesman@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I thought gun locks were required to be included with sales?

I know several gun owners who carry and eventually the gun is just like a wallet or keys, they forget about it, loose it, and drop it on the ground. Thousands of gun owners try to bring their weapons through airport security every year, and most of them just forgot they had it on them.

You're thinking of owners who hunt or shoot for recreation forgetting all the wannabe gunslingers for whom storing the thing in a safe would defeat the purpose of owning the thing.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The quality of gun locks given for free with a purchase is very poor. Properly mounted safes are the best bet. Locks alone don't prevent someone from taking it else where to open it with powertools.

Relevant lockpicking lawyer videos:

https://youtu.be/ke418cAUcPs?si=

https://youtu.be/o0LYD9zgWnw?si=

https://youtu.be/6dF9bsQ50Os?si=

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not saying that's acceptable but a crap gun safe would still be better than nothing which is what they had in this case.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Turns out those re-usable zip ties pretty much qualify as a "gun lock" to comply with that regulation. The state of the lock industry is completely pathetic anyway, and guns come with the laziest shit they can muster.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
238 points (96.5% liked)

News

23530 readers
4023 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS