314
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Upset over 'Curb Your Enthusiasm,' episode MTG vows to protect Georgia from 'nasty commies' who generated $4 billion for state last year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 137 points 6 months ago

Just remember: if ever you think you aren't qualified to be in Congress, the bar is people like MTG, Boebert, and Santos.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 63 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Santos was a crazy person, but holy hell, he was hilarious! Part of me thinks he was a plant from all of the late night talk show hosts to provide material and boost ratings.

where did those babies come from?!

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 46 points 6 months ago

I really, really hate to say this, because it is itself a reflection of the ludicrous reality we're living in, but I would almost put Santos more in the category of "bizarre performance art" than any kind of serious political threat.

I'm saying I would not have a hard time believing that he doesn't really give a shit about the republican platform, or any political platform for that matter.

Even more succinctly, that asshole has been doing nothing more than auditioning for Dancing With The Stars this whole time.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I could absolutely see a story breaking in a few years about how he was a paid actor from some political humor show. Like, they wanted to do a segment on just how far in life you could go in America by being a complete fraud.

The further it went, the more out of control it got until their character "George Santos" found himself in an election.

When the studio wanted to pull the plug, a few key players on the show convinced them to let it play out. It wasn't until he fucking won that everyone agreed that the charade was up, and they needed to do their civic duty and leak some of the fakeness to the press.

Incredibly, even after that it took nearly a year for the powers-that-be to step in and do their job, at which point, the showrunners were now a little too scared of the ramifications to own up to it, until the media frenzy had died down.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Fast forward to 2025: George Santos was Sasha Baron Cohen in disguise this whole time filming his new movie Mr. Santos Goes To Washington!

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Entirely plausible

[-] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Santos was overqualified. I heard he had a Ph.D. and was working on a second.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 6 months ago

I also heard he was crucified, but then he got better.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Was that before or after he discovered the Higgs boson?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 6 months ago

Before, obviously. How else could he have started the Big Bang?

[-] some_guy 2 points 6 months ago

He was on The Big Bang? Oh, right. He played Sheldon. Did you know he wrote every episode?

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
314 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18802 readers
4331 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS