216
submitted 5 months ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

The business arm of Raspberry Pi is preparing to make an initial public offering (IPO) in London. CEO Eben Upton tells Ars that should the IPO happen, it will let Raspberry Pi's not-for-profit side expand by "at least a factor of 2X." And while it's "an understandable thing" that Raspberry Pi enthusiasts could be concerned, "while I'm involved in running the thing, I don't expect people to see any change in how we do things."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] garretble@lemmy.world 171 points 5 months ago

All I know is that basically every IPO I’ve seen has eventually made the product worse. I have no data to back this up, just feelings, but still. As soon as a company starts worrying about shareholders, corners start getting cut or prices start going up for no reason.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 78 points 5 months ago

Straight up this has me concerned for the same reason

Once a company becomes beholden to shareholders that's literally the goal

[-] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

More of the same here. This is extremely depressing news.

It sucks that running a successful business can never be enough.

Prepare for Pi to start going closed source and fighting against "copycat" SBC boards. It'll take a generation to see the enshittification set in, but Orange Pi and other similar projects are going to be the winners in a strictly profit based comparison.

[-] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

I can’t wait to have to pay a subscription fee for some aspect of it.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago
  • Google
  • Reddit

Those are the best two examples that come to my mind. Both were great until they IPO’d.

The problem, as I see it, with IPO’s is that the company becomes beholden to shareholders who care nothing for the product, and only for the profit. Quality and profit are fairly mutually exclusive these days.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Reddit hasn’t gone public just yet

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Sometimes you have to pre-suck to show investors you are serious about dismantling your company so they can feed on the corpse.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 6 points 5 months ago

build something, IPO and cash out, then wall st. vultures suck all the value out of it

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

When they are private they still have shareholders, the shares are just not available to the public. When it goes public is when some of those private shareholders want to cash out. So they drive the fundamentals however and sell the stock over the next years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fine_sandy_bottom@aussie.zone 69 points 5 months ago

If people think that an IPO means we're going to … push prices up, push the margins up, push down the feature sets, the only answer we can give is, watch us. Keep watching," he said. "Let's look at it in 15, 20 years' time."

What a fucking lame answer.

RasPi was cool at one time, but that time has long since passed.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

When their focus changed to more corporate aligned interests they became less cool. Victims of their own success I’d guess.

But this a politician’s answer. They just didn’t answer the question at all but implied that if we check back in 15 years we’d see that they had “our” best interests at heart.

Um no company has your back. They are all in it to make as much money as possible. I mean I don’t blame them but I don’t trust the em either.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 months ago

I do blame them. Success does not require obscene profit. A company like that can actually be both successful and not sell themselves out like that.

If profit is a company's only motive, then I'm sorry, but that company has no real value or purpose.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago

Lol, right?

The sheer ego to tell your customers to reserve judgement on a massive, company changing event for over a fucking decade! Delusional.

Especially when they've been completely beat out in their market niche for ages and are now only holding on due to brand recognition. It's easy to have grass roots community support when you were the only product in your niche, but they've been coasting on that for ages with no real work to truly stay relevant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago

"...watch us [do exactly that]. Keep watching [as we do exactly that and worse]. Let's look at it in 15, 20 years' time [long after I've cut and run with my golden parachute and left the rotting corpse of this company get picked apart by vulture investors and am long past caring]"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 58 points 5 months ago

"I don't expect to see any change in how we do things."

Oh, this is going to age like fucking milk. You belong to the shareholders now, mate. They'll MAKE you change how you do things, and you'll love it.

[-] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 months ago

What do we want?
_More profit! _ When do we want it?
Now!

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I was already planning on never buying another Pi based on how they fucked over consumers in favor of business customers during the shortages. This only reinforces it. Companies going public irreversibly eradicates any and all consumer value in favor of shareholders and I do not support any company that actively chooses that path. Fuck 'em. I'll just buy random chinese SBC's instead...

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Exactly where I'm at, hearing this news. Chasing growth in profit at the expense of everything is a sure way to ruin a good product. I'm already not a fan of the Pi 5 being so expensive. I thought the goal was extremely cheap, low performance computing. The idea of a functional desktop computer for $30 was kind of seismic. I guess we still have the zero.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 49 points 5 months ago

I personally don't know of any company that has gotten better post-IPO than they were before. Would be enlightening it if anyone could suggest examples or personal anecdotes.

[-] experbia@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

I've prepared for you a comprehensive list, here:

[-] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 10 points 5 months ago

That's a wholly complete list indeed. Must have been tough to put together /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

No change in current focus, which happens to be the business sector. :)

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Eben Upton has always been a pile of dog shit. If his mouth is open, he's lying.

Back when the first Pi was released, it only had 256mb of memory. He came by our hackerspace to promote the Pi, and swore up and down to us all that no updates were coming down the pipe, that it was safe to buy a Pi from him right then, and we weren't gonna be missing out on anything.

1 week later, they announced all Pis were going to come with 512mb of ram by default, no price increase.

Fuck him. Fuck his stupid face. Never trust a word this dipshit says.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago

Welp time to move on from Raspberry Pi.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 17 points 5 months ago

the single board computer market has came far since them.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 11 points 5 months ago

Probably why they’re cashing out now.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@aussie.zone 6 points 5 months ago

It really has, for most uses there are better boards

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago

I wouldn't necessarily read too much into this.

I think most people's aversions to the concept of IPOs stems from the fact that it lies at the end of the not-too-uncommon lifecycle of VC-backed companies:

  • Get VC investment
  • Subsidize your product using said investment
  • Grow like hell on account of handing out things at a too-low price
  • Prepare for IPO by worsening the deal for customers to improve financials (also known as enshittification)
  • Use IPO money to pay off VCs and leave both them and founders with a large chunk of money

Post-IPO the company has to abide by the regular rules of being a company, meaning that they never really re-capture what it was like when they had a large stack of free money to make all deals sweeter than the competition.

All this to say is that the damage is done once you raise VC capital. Raspberry Pi has raised one fairly small round, so there's potentially some damage done there, but it's way less than your average tech startup did throughout the years, so this doesn't necessarily have to mean that everything will go to hell now.

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 5 months ago

Thanks for explaining the cycle, my assumption was that bringing in board members is what ruins everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

while I'm involved

I guess that's the best one can hope for in top-down corporations. I wish they'd make it a workers' co-op for their and the community's long term sake but who am I kidding.. 🥲

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Probably a radical opinion but I think all businesses should be worker co-ops. Doubt it would fix everything but it would be a good start

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

How long before he is no longer involved? It could be sooner than he thinks, who knows.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 months ago

Well, I guess I've bought my last pi then, was nice while it lasted

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

So who is the new raspberry pi?

[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

RIP Raspberry Pi

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

So, when Raspberry Pi is inevitably enshitified if they go through with this, who's gonna be the next big (rather, small) company to get something Pi equivalent to run an OS like Lakka or Recalbox?

I honestly don't know since I don't know of any other companies making these kinds of mini computers.

[-] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

There are plenty of alternative SBCs out there, many mimicking the RPi form factor as well. Look into Radxa, Banana Pi, Orange Pi, Pine64, ODROID, etc. I picked up an Indiedroid Nova board last year that is RPi form factor but has the more powerful RK3588 processor. Drivers are still WIP but it is quite fast. I also run my home server on a Radxa Rock Pi 4, which has an RK3399 processor and is very comparable to the RPi 4. Drivers for it are pretty solid these days and it doesn't require extra work to set up. Just download an Armbian image and go.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] verysoft@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

That explains a lot if this was their plan. RIP Raspberry Pi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 5 months ago

They always say there is no change after IPO.. But there always is..

[-] antrosapien@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago
[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Time to stock up on pi 5's

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

There are alternatives that don’t involve giving them your $$

[-] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Genuine question: what alternative would you recommend? I was planning on buying a few for various projects next month with my next paycheck but now I’m not too keen on funding them.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Two that I can think of are the BananaPi and OrangePi. Google “raspberry pi alternatives” and I’m sure you’ll find much more.

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

My local Pinkberry uses orange pi as their POS computer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 10 points 5 months ago

Or get any of the hundreds of other SBCs on the market.

No point adding to their sales figures to make the IPO more successful.

[-] Rayspekt@kbin.social 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How can the not-for-profit side of business expand with an IPO? People invest specifically to increase their wealth. How's this going to happen with a non-profit business?

Surely those shareholders just fucking love Raspberry Pi so damn much that they just have over their cash no questions asked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago
[-] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
216 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

55919 readers
2579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS