1017

Avast, the cybersecurity software company, is facing a $16.5 million fine after it was caught storing and selling customer information without their consent. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the fine on Thursday and said that it’s banning Avast from selling user data for advertising purposes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 161 points 5 months ago

They definitely made more than that selling data what a fucking joke

[-] db2@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

F*C fines are just protection money payments.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 5 months ago

If the software is free, but not open source, it's harvesting your data. How else do you think these companies stay in business?

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 61 points 5 months ago

If you pay tho they're also harvesting your data. And if you don't use your service they make a ghost profile and harvest that data.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

The only way to fully prevent it is to remove the profit-motive altogether.

[-] GreatDong3000@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Yeah I love it when people say "if you don't pay you are the product" as if paying for youtube premium, google one, reddit premium or spotify will stop them from harvesting your data haha that's how naive we were back when we thought data was collected only for ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

Free my ass! Avast charges money for that service. Hell they make you subscribe to use any service outside basic virus scan. So customers paid to have their data stolen and sold.

[-] CustodialTeapot@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

I dislike this sentiment. Just because something is FOSS or open source, doesn't mean it's not harvesting your data or doing something nefarious.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 23 points 5 months ago

kinda wrong sentiment to get from the statement. statement is only saying if

if free and NOT open source > data harvest

it doesn't necessarily imply that

if free and open source > doesnt data harvest

at all. its just you have the ability to find out via code of they do or not. thats more or less in the boat of logical paradoxes you can make.

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A good example would be Yuzu (the Switch emulator), it was open source and collected so much telemetry that Nintendo might go after their users.

This might be fear tactic but it shows you that you aren't safe

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 72 points 5 months ago

$16.5 million is not even a slap on the wrist

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 18 points 5 months ago

A great business model actually

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 72 points 5 months ago

Five years ago, I posted on Reddit about how Avast had installed a browser without my consent and set it as default while I was out of town and away from my computer. That post has had comments added to it several times a year ever since, meaning that they're still trying that nonsense. They stole my data without my consent by importing all of my browser data, and now it's come out that they blatantly sold it without my consent as well.

I said it then, and I say it now: If you install something without my knowledge or consent, you're a virus, plain and simple.

[-] LoremIpsumGenerator@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

Cybersec company ❌

Advertisement/Data mining ✔️

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago

Jesus Christ.

Remember when Google's Motto was "Don't be Evil" It was supposed to be a jab at Microsoft, but it feels like every year tech companies find news ways to just be fucking evil.

PS. Google kind of fails to live up to that motto too, I don't even know if it's still an official motto.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 45 points 5 months ago

Google execs knew this motto will just get in the way of maximizing profits for shareholders, so they dropped it a few years ago.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 33 points 5 months ago

I don’t even know if it’s still an official motto.

It's not

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 months ago

No they officially (quietly) dropped it like a decade ago

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Kind of? They would happily sell your mother heroine and auction off her house. They fail at not being evil like Antarctica fails at being hospitable to palm trees.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago

This is a careful reminder to be VERY SCEPTICAL about not only "anti-viruses" (like bro, Windows defender is good enough), but also browsers. There is a high probability that the company is either a data broker or fintech... looking at you, Opera.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago

Do we know how much money they made on it? If it was more than $16.5 then it was still a good step on their balance sheet.

This stuff needs to be fined at the full income they made from the tool plus some penalty. Corporations only care about their balance sheets.

[-] Interstellar_1@pawb.social 43 points 5 months ago

That's horrifying. I remember using the avast private browser when I was younger as to not get tracked by Google chrome, but i was just getting tracked by avast instead. :(

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 27 points 5 months ago

It's capitalism. You get to choose who steals your personal data.

[-] THE_ANTIHERO@lemmy.today 15 points 5 months ago

Unless you use a trusted firefox fork

I kinda feel like capitalism is treating me like a lemon thief these days.

[-] Slovene@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago

You lemon stealing whore!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 40 points 5 months ago

And I'm sure that fine was as high or higher than the profit they made from the data... what, it wasn't?!

[-] crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 5 months ago
[-] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Jesus christ right!! I'm curious how much they made off that data.

[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is fucking garbage.

When a company gets caught with their hand in the cookie jar, it's not a punishment to put one of the cookies back.

Fines should be ten TIMES what the company made from their misbehaviour, not ten percent.

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 27 points 5 months ago

Ah, the snake oil turned out to be poisonous.

[-] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 5 months ago

that is one of two reasons why I stopped using their software.

Too many scare-ware screens and too much bloatware that you have to be mindful about not installing.

[-] kworpy@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago

Can't believe a company with a notorious history of spying on users is at it again for the 234th time!

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Is there a class action lawsuit?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Avast, the cybersecurity software company, is facing a $16.5 million fine after it was caught storing and selling customer information without their consent.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the fine on Thursday and said that it’s banning Avast from selling user data for advertising purposes.

From at least 2014 to 2020, Avast harvested user web browsing information through its antivirus software and browser extension, according to the FTC’s complaint.

“We are committed to our mission of protecting and empowering people’s digital lives,” Avast spokesperson Jess Monney said in a statement to The Verge.

“While we disagree with the FTC’s allegations and characterization of the facts, we are pleased to resolve this matter and look forward to continuing to serve our millions of customers around the world.”

In January, the FTC reached a settlement with Outlogic (formerly X-Mode Social) that prevents the data broker from selling information that can be used to track users’ locations.


The original article contains 398 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] noorbeast@lemmy.zip 21 points 5 months ago

“While we disagree with the FTC’s allegations and characterization of the facts, we are pleased to resolve this matter and look forward to continuing to serve our millions of customers around the world.”...translation, we regret being caught but look forward to the opportunity of exploring alternate ways to exploiting consumers for profit.

[-] krimson@feddit.nl 10 points 5 months ago
[-] danielfgom@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

They should be put out of business and those responsible jailed

[-] slowroll@r.nf 5 points 5 months ago

this, i prefer the service based on Free and Open Source Software,

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
1017 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
3882 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS