296
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Presumptive Republican nominee installed allies to run party but loyalty tests have led to weakening of certain areas, including data

Donald Trump’s allies installed to run the Republican National Committee have faced a tumultuous first month in charge, buffeted by staffing problems and operational headaches as they attempt to bring the party apparatus under the control of the Trump campaign before the 2024 election.

The internal strife at the RNC has prompted the Trump campaign to privately admonish its new leaders in recent weeks. And the move to orchestrate a purge may have partly backfired with far-reaching consequences for the RNC, multiple sources familiar with the matter said.

The Trump takeover of the RNC arrived with a show of force just days after the new chair, Michael Whatley, and the new co-chair Lara Trump were elected, when emails went out to entire teams at the organization informing them they could resign and reapply for their jobs, or be terminated.

The idea was to ensure there would be no overlap between the RNC and the Trump campaign, which already had robust political and communications teams, and to weed out any staffers who were not fully committed to Trump and the wider Maga movement.

But the threats of termination and the rumored loyalty tests – which turned out to be accurate when staffers were asked in job interviews if they thought the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, though there has been no evidence of election fraud – may have been too aggressive.

In the weeks that followed, although the new RNC leadership quietly extended offers to a majority of former staffers, with the exception of those who worked in the RNC political department, some staffers on crucial teams declined to return, the sources said.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Granite@kbin.social 106 points 3 months ago

Fascists don’t care about the quality of data, but the quality of emotions they can manipulate.

They’ll scream rigged if they lose and we all know it.

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They've already decided that it's impossible for Biden to win. Therefore if he does, that means the election was "stolen". Tucker Carlson a month ago in his video about the state of the Union address, skip to 11:30: https://youtu.be/f72Tc-iXc4A

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

I hope Trump runs the RNC just like one of his businesses.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Offload it 99% to someone else but jump on periodically with really stupid demands?

That's definitely how his presidency ran.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I was more talking about the bankruptcies, but "his people" don't seem particularly adept either.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 50 points 3 months ago

Boeing has entered the chat...

Politics aside, it seems like there's a wide spread mentality that tells these leaders that all they have to do is snap their fingers and the workers can magically make their desires appear.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

seems like there's a wide spread mentality that tells these leaders that all they have to do is snap their fingers and the workers can magically make their desires appear.

Because there are tons of people who will do their damnedest to promise they can make it happen for the right price. In the context of the post's topic, I'd be surprised if even a third of Trump's staff actually like him or believe in whatever their cause is. It's filled with soulless opportunists. The subject of this article speaks for itself, bunch of incompetent opportunists climbed positions in their cult and fired tons of key personnel that negatively impacted their operations. Same thing happens in the corporate world. Despite their promises or facade, they fail to deliver more often than not.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

There's a ton of people who will say that they can do it for the right price.

The Naked Emperor can pay a hundred brown nosers to tell him how good he looks; he's still naked. I'm sure that the Boeing engineers who built the terrible planes knew that it wasn't the best design; but they okayed the plans because that's what the bosses wanted.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m sure that the Boeing engineers who built the terrible planes knew that it wasn’t the best design; but they okayed the plans because that’s what the bosses wanted.

Having worked in corporate for more than a decade now, I'm pretty sure anyone who said that the planes were shitty design throughout the design and review process were asked to explain themselves ad nauseam while everyone who was admiring the emperor's new clothes was free to leave the offices early for cocktail hour.

That's the way these things actually work: group think. Someone coming in saying "none of this appears to make sense" has to be a one-in-a-billion level genius because they are lining up for the firing squad. (And what genius would do that?) When the group has already written up the proposal and the customer has already signed off on it, it will not be changed no matter how insane or impossible it is.

And then QA is also a laugh as a gate. Eventually through a variety of tactics, every single QA resource that tries to actually assure quality will be either excised from the company, or be turned into a yes-man / rubber stamp by corporate movements.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

That's almost exactly John Barnett's story.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Civil service.

When one of our people retires, they get a one page, mimeographed form instead of an exit interview. They are supposed to write down what their 25 years of experience on the job has taught them, and what lessons they would like to pass on to the upcoming leadership.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

The loss of talent may be particularly notable on the RNC’s data team – increasingly important in presidential elections – which is being relocated out of RNC headquarters in Washington and to the Trump campaign’s headquarters in Palm Beach, Florida.

I mean, that's sheer jenius.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

How's that for a loyalty test

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The joint fundraising agreement has been a priority for weeks. By doing joint fundraising, Trump and the RNC can accept donations as large as $814,600. During the Republican primary, Trump had been limited to taking checks with a maximum amount of $6,600 through his campaign.

Cripes. The Orange Cheat-o

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

It's ok the real funding comes from Super PACs who don't have the limits a campaign has. Nobody actually follows the 6600 rule in practice thanks to the Super PAC loophole.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 16 points 3 months ago

No. Stop. Don't.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

Rip each other apart 🥰

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
296 points (97.7% liked)

News

21850 readers
5205 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS