102
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 35 points 4 months ago

Shanahan, a millennial patent attorney and California mega donor

Hmm...

Kennedy chose the 38-year-old tech attorney, he said, for her experience in emerging technologies like AI and has spoken positively about her track record on the environment and inquisitive mind. She boasts a compelling personal story, having grown up on welfare, with a hard-scrabble upbringing that runs counter to his elite family. She was also, presumably, chosen to round out his ticket in the gender and age departments.

Shanahan, the source said, is someone who has had “the whole deck stacked against her” and has ascended to become “a living embodiment of this American dream that is evaporating for so many people.”

“I think it’s going to resonate with a large swath of the electorate,” the source said.

Why would I care that she is a Millennial who "made it"? She's a patent attorney. How is she going to help me and people like me at all? She likes "AI", the "environment", and has an "inquisitive mind"?

Millennials are not that stupid. I don't think they care if someone "like them" is elected, unless that person has good ideas. It's like when Republicans run one of the few brown skinned people they have. Most non-white people have been lied to for decades. They're not going to be tricked that easily.

Fucking Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell were two of the most qualified black Republicans and they couldn't move the needle for them.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 18 points 4 months ago

Also, she "made it" by marrying a Google co-founder, not because her own business was remarkable.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 28 points 4 months ago
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Someone of so little notoriety, they didn't even make it in to the headline.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago
[-] mtdyson_01@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 4 months ago

He was never expected to win or even be a contender. All he is a stooge for republicans in case it's a close race between Biden and Trump and his major financial backers are betting that he will pull enough votes away from Biden to give Trump a victory in swing states.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

RFK Jr is a lot like the orange grifter/adulterer.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 8 points 4 months ago

Oh thank God, he couldn't wrangle Jesse Ventura.

Now I can vote for Jesse in 2028

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

At least Jesse has previous political experience.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

And supports unions and universal healthcare!

As long as his advisors can stop him from talking about the reptile infiltration he's the perfect candidate as far as I'm concerned.

[-] Grilipper54@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Doesn't RFK Jr support both these as well?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nope. Man's a "centrist."

Besides, can RFK Jr pile drive Ventura into a coma?

Well, now we know who's the superior candidate, don't we?

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

But does he support the reptile infiltration?

[-] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

She "made it" by marrying a billionaire co-founder of Google. Then cheated on him with Elon Musk. Her husband then divorced her because of it and...

Shanahan and Brin had signed a prenuptial agreement. During the divorce proceedings, Shanahan's attorneys argued that she had signed the prenuptial agreement under duress, and in mediation sought more than $1 billion of Brin's $95 billion fortune. The divorce was finalized in 2023 in a confidential arbitration. Forbes reported that Shanahan likely received around 2.6 million Alphabet Class B shares from Brin, worth $390 million in March 2024, and possibly received an additional, equal amount of Class C shares.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Shanahan

Yeah, she really represents the American Dream.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Who?" -- Most of America.

[-] teddy2021@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

He looks like he's 30 seconds away from chewing through someone's femoral artery at all times.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Seriously, Google - "Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Marriages"

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
102 points (92.5% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS