95
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 74 points 7 months ago

I'm going to take a guess and assume it's about taking over DeSantis's war chest and campaign ppl since trump's broke and no real personnel as his are getting indicted.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago
[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 months ago

Trading for a shitty enough VP that Dems might actually be afraid to impeach him.

Trump aught to be impeached for the emoluments after the first month, but if a full fledged fascist is set to take his spot…

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 70 points 7 months ago

If douchebaggery were a harnessable fissile energy source, these two shitcunts in close proximity could power North America for a thousand generations.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago
[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Mutual.

Regards.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago
[-] proper@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

could cut the wings off a gnat, bug

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Are you quoting the TV edit? I remember the quote being “… circumcise a gnat, Bug.”

Either way… hilarious movie.

[-] proper@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Oh ha, I may be! though it could also just be my fading memory.

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Hey… if you’re old enough to recall the movie well enough to quote it, you’re allowed to flub an obscure quote. I was asking more to check my memory more than anything else, lol.

God damnit, John Candy was such a fucking gem. Departed too soon.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 7 months ago

Probably a sign of weakness from these two but also probably good strategy unfortunately.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

"Stand on your tiptoes and kiss the ring, DeSanctimonious”.

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

How much groveling did Trump require?

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Remember how the right crucified Biden for picking Harris after they sparred during the debates? I'm sure they'll be first to criticize this...right?

[-] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Did they? I remember it differently, I guess. Harris had a very pointed attack on Biden in one of the debates, and when he ended up picking her, I saw it as a sign of maturity and growth from his old-fashioned ways.

Sparring during debates is one thing. Trump absolutely shat upon DeSantis for the better part of a year. I just don’t know how voters can forget “desanctimonious.”

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 7 points 7 months ago

Wasn't there some law about the VP and president not being from the same state? I thought I read that somewhere.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Sort of. There's some electoral college fuckery due to the 12th amendment. Votes for president and vice president are counted separately and electors can't vote for two people from their own state.

So let's say I'm an elector. The year is 2000. Bush and Cheney are on the ticket, both with Texas residency. They won with 271 total electoral votes. However, me and the other Texas folks can only vote for one of them, knocking Cheney back 32 electoral votes. The House would then need to vote on who the VP would be.

This almost happened. However, Cheney changed his residency and moved back to Wyoming and put his Texas house up for sale. So that didn't come up.

Most of the time it wouldn't matter, but in a close race it could. But with the Republican house (unless more leave before then) I don't think that's much of a worry for them. More concerning is the rate at which Trump is farting himself awake at his trial.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Trump getting elected and Harris ending up as his VP in a fluke would surely cause his cheeseburger stuffed heart to finally give out, resulting in the most hilarious outcome of the election imaginable.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 3 points 7 months ago

Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Sure thing! There's a lot of confusion about it and if I can help alleviate it then I consider it a privilege to do so.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

DeShitStain could do the world a favor and bury the hatchet in trumps back….

[-] Grobmobularb@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Always go for the head -Thanos

[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I was somewhat disappointed to discover that no skulls were involved in this hatchet burial.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

HAH! If they manage to get through a single photo op I’ll be surprised. These spewholes are so narcissistic and petty there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell it will last for more than two minutes.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

I always thought Trump would pick Ron DeSanctimonious as his VP running mate. Oof.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
95 points (89.3% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2849 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS