this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

Jokes and Humor

6368 readers
1 users here now

A broad community for text and image based jokes, humor, and memes.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They're not warm blooded. Maybe they're flamingos.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And they produce dairy-free milk, whereas mammal milk is definitely of the dairy variety.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is human milk a dairy product?

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Human milk certainly contains Lactose and Whey Protein.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But is it a dairy product?

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just gave you a pretty succinct definition of Dairy. Yes.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google shows conflicting answers and the Wikipedia page doesn't list human milk.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if you go by FDA's Title 21 Chapter I Subchapter B Part 131 Subpart B then not only is human milk not a dairy product but the only animal who produces milk is a cow, however in 2018 they requested submissions weighing in on whether plant products should continue to use "dairy group" words such as milk and yogurt on their labeling, so I think there is probably some leeway on this.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

the only animal who produces milk is a cow

Some kids are gonna go hungry, no goats milk for ewes.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And we all know how trustworthy Google Search is...

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

Not actually using Google, just using it as a generic term for search.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but it's pretty difficult to buy.

[–] SamVimes@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not actually especially difficult. People who produce more than their kid needs will sell or give away the extra to people who are struggling to produce enough. Also... Some hardcore body builders buy it as well.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

There's apparently also breastmilk ice-cream!

Also, beware the diseases. Milk can spread virus AFAIK.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They’re not warm blooded.

depends on the climate. natural habitat: yes. grocery store: no.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By definition, "warm blooded" means "produce their own heat" (obviously drastically simplified). I don't think it matters whether the coconut is on a deserted island or on the shelf at Woollies, it's still not warm blooded.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if it's on fire, using it's own energy to produce the heat?

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 5 points 1 year ago

As I'm burning I'm the happiest I've ever been. I'm finally mammal.

-the coconut

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, that sounds like poikilothermy to me

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They don’t secrete a filtered blood derived substance through modified sweat glands, thus not milk producing, nearly milk substitute producing.

Wild thought, vampires that drink milk instead of blood.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

you mean like human babies?

[–] Crackhappy@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Crackhappy@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neither Coconuts nor Oats have Mammary Exocrine Glands

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I heard that in Sheldon Coopers voice.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can milk any animal that has nipples... but, do coconuts have nipples?!

I rest my case 😎

[–] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] duramu@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Is not about the nips, but the mammary glands.

[–] midnight@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Behold, a man!

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mammals aren't "living organisms with fur and milk". They're "the most recent common ancestor of the echidna and the cat, and anything descended from that".

[–] pooberbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whoa, so cats came from coconuts?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why are there still coconuts? Check mate atheists

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Proof that humans and coconuts lived together. Suck it science!

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

echidna I understand, but why cat?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

The actual definition is "monotremes and placental mammals". I just picked one of each.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

You can milk a cat, that checks out.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

Nah, coconuts don't have the right kind of teeth and ear bones.

While "having fur and producing milk" may have been the original description of mammals, biology no longer classifies things that way.

Today, all of the classification is based on Clades, which can be established by doing DNA investigation (similarity matching). So, "mammals" are defined as a clade. And whether somebody falls into it or not depends on their DNA similarity. And coconut clearly do not belong into there.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Geez I thought we left the coconut fuckers back at the place which may not be named.

[–] solanaceous@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

In this essay I will

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

gasp!

[ clutches pearls ]

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

coconuts are plants and you're an idiot

[–] remington@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

you’re an idiot

Name-calling isn't nice. Remember to be(e) nice at Beehaw. Consider this a warning.

But "idiot" isn't a name, i guess?

/jk Sorry, I'll show myself out.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Vegans hate this one weird trick

[–] cafuneandchill@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago