57
Ableism (beehaw.org)
submitted 7 months ago by toothpicks@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org

Why does everyone suddenly seem to think it's ok to say the R word again? I feel like I hadn't heard it in years and suddenly everyone around me is using it, and I see it on Reddit all the time. Am I imagining it? Is anyone seeing this? I don't even know what to say when it's suddenly just everyone in a group and everyone acts like it's normal.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 35 points 7 months ago

I've noticed this as well, and I have no idea where it's coming from. If you see this on Beehaw, please report it, though, we're definitely not okay with slurs of any kind.

[-] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 19 points 7 months ago

Just confirming this as an admin for the visibility.

[-] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 21 points 7 months ago

This is interesting to think about because I might be one of the last generations of people who existed physically with one another more often than we would text or message one another. Since my old man hat is on, back in my day if you let one fly like this there were immediate social consequences. Everyone would go silent and look at you in disapproval and the person who was really invested in expunging the word would, at that moment, explain why saying that word was unacceptable. The person who said it of course wouldn't have a change of heart, but they would learn that if they wanted to participate socially they would have to watch their language.

Now that it costs $100 to leave the house and most socialization takes place behind in a non-rich communication medium there isn't really a consequence like there used to be. In most online "communities" no one is actually in community with one another and have no reason to be pro-social other than wanting to be pro-social. Trolling has always been a problem, but now that more of the population in general is communicating primarily on the channels where trolling is happening, trolling is now a political and social problem.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 25 points 7 months ago

Back in my day people were throwing the r word around without consequences. Basically using it as a synonym for idiot or dumbass. It didn't start being brought up as an issue until well into my adulthood. I don't really associate it with people who are disabled because of that. That being said I try not to use it now.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 6 points 7 months ago

I really do think about this from time to time as to why we ever even used this word. I grew up the same as you where we all said it and used it as a replacement word for "ass" in situations where cussing wasn't allowed but you needed a word that hit a bit harder than calling someone stupid. I can't ever remember a time anyone I knew using it as a slur because someone would beat your ass if you got caught bullying anyone disabled. Now that I know that it is offensive I don't use it. But for me it's a bit weird fully relating to the current perception of the word in today's society because I still have mostly positive memories of goofing off with friends associated with it.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

Stupid was a medical term similar to the r word. It got replaced because people started using it as a slur. So did the r word. I wonder if people will start using neurodivergent or some other term as a slur, forcing the medical community to adopt another term once more.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

I agree. The same thing with the words idiot and moron. I find the whole evolution and usage of words to be fascinating.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 6 months ago

Dumb too, but it meant mute. Quite weird this one.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 6 points 6 months ago

Ohhhh retard, this whole time I was thinking you were all talking about rape.

Where I'm from in Australia it's used a lot, almost no one takes offence to it because it's accepted in its other meaning of idiot. Those that do get told to grow up, much like people who laugh at the use of the word gay for happy.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm always amused at how different cultures handle language. Can't imagine these here:

...but I would love to try them sometime. Would be fun to hand out at pride :)

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 6 months ago

They're very tasty one of my favourite icecreams just a shame I don't like people who are missing toes

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You're not imagining it.

I've seen it (and many other ableist slurs) used far too often, especially for a site that is generally supposed to be more left leaning (which tbf isn't saying much when it comes to combatting ableism because we seem to have very few true allies) but is also full of tech-bros, who love punching down at others based on perceived intelligence, and who also have quite a lot of crossover with 4chan type cesspits, so sadly it isn't unexpected.

I call it out it when I see it, and generally block and report, but what I find most frustrating is that mods throughout lemmy/fediverse (again, even on the most supposedly left leaning instances like lemmy.ml) just ignore the reports and don't remove the comments (I know people are busy, I don't expect instant action, I give it a week or two in general before I check the modlog).
I've had to block several large communities, most that I'm actually interested in (mostly tech and science related, again, places where people love feeling superior based on perceived intelligence), because I get the message - making people like me feel safe and included isn't a priority in those spaces, so I refuse to occupy them.

Whether the privileged group accept it or not, that is the result of using slurs - making already marginalised people feel unwelcome and excluded.

And when they tell me not to be so easily offended, I link this (or maybe this or this) with the full knowledge that they will probably never read it, but with the hope that someone else might, and that it might make them reconsider their use of certain words (though I don't hold my breath in anticipation of society at large giving a shit).

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 8 points 7 months ago

Those are some awesome resources, yoinking those for sure.

Ableism and fatmisia are some the last bastions of acceptable and casual bigotry, so they are for sure the hardest to get rid of. Usually when you bring up the eugenics origin, at least for people around me, folks tend to take a step back. Often I lead with that.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Those are some awesome resources, yoinking those for sure.

The more the merrier!

Ableism and fatmisia are some the last bastions of acceptable and casual bigotry

Yup, the other day I had to really quickly back out of some comments sections on articles related to fast food because the comments were so full of fat shaming it made me rage. People don't think twice about either.

Usually when you bring up the eugenics origin, at least for people around me, folks tend to take a step back.

In my experience they get even more defensive, because eugenics is something they recognise as bad, but not their casual ableism, or the existence of a relationship between the two.. But then these are randoms on the internet I'm talking about, not people actually close to me, they'd probably be much more reasonable if it ever came to it lol

You have inspired an infodump, some links specifically go in to the eugenics connection, others are a bit more broad (I also have a bunch about the relationship between capitalism, "productivity", and ableism, and some on the myth of independence, which I wasn't sure were closely related enough, but am more than happy to share as well!) if you want more articles to yoink:

https://www.drakemusic.org/blog/nim-ralph/understanding-disability/

https://www.yorku.ca/edu/unleading/ableism/ (the entire project is worth a look)

https://liminalnest.wordpress.com/2018/06/23/intelligence-is-a-myth-on-deconstructing-the-roots-of-cognitive-ableism/

https://www.northwestern.edu/onebook/the-reluctant-mr-darwin/essays/darwin-morality.html

https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2013/may/09/evolutionary-theory-gone-wrong-darwin

https://web.archive.org/web/20230605065733/https://ollibean.com/intelligence-is-an-ableist-concept/

https://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/23/ableist-word-profile-intelligence/ (the entire blog is worth a look)

https://gracelapointe.medium.com/some-thoughts-on-online-ableism-424e26f1bb2a

https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/09/symptoms-executive-dysfunction/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewpulrang/2019/12/27/ableist-narratives-that-poison-disability-policy-and-disabled-peoples-lives/

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago

Hell yes, thanks for the resources!

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

Sure thing, I'm always happy to share useful info!

Also, was the "hell yes" to more links or just in general? You're good either way, don't worry.. 😂

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago
[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Cool. I figured I'd just troll my bookmarks and paste anything related, but there was more than I realised lol. I did cut back, but this still feels like a bit much, sorry 😂

Language related:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331107477_SaytheWord_A_Disability_Culture_Commentary_on_the_Erasure_of_Disability

https://fightingtalk.substack.com/p/disability-is-not-a-dirty-word

https://30daysofautism.blog/2023/03/21/lets-talk-about-language-is-disability-a-bad-word/

https://sailhelps.org/so-whats-wrong-with-the-word-handicapped/

https://everydayfeminism.com/2014/05/grammar-snobbery/

https://medium.com/no-prescription-needed/grammar-the-worlds-most-under-recognized-social-construct-a54e096ecc9c

https://theautisticadvocate.com/functioning-labels-why-you-shouldnt-be-using-them-thanks-a-bunch-terminology-dudes/

https://www.ncmh.info/2019/04/04/fallacy-functioning-labels/

https://graymattersmd.com/functioning-labels-autism/

https://web.archive.org/web/20231127173144/https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/15-common-phrases-that-are-way-more-ableist-than-you-may-realize/

https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/08/alternatives-to-oppressive-language/

https://web.archive.org/web/20201108200517/https://raddle.me/f/Illegalism/77441/40-alternatives-to-ableist-and-oppressive-words

https://www.autistichoya.com/p/ableist-words-and-terms-to-avoid.html

https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/no-joking-matter-words-and-disability

Capitalism/"productivity" related:

https://dailyfreepress.com/2020/11/19/mind-your-business-ableism-is-rooted-in-capitalism/

https://atmos.earth/productivity-culture-ableism-ecofeminism-capitalism-the-slow-grind/

https://thestrand.ca/capitalism-ableism-and-the-glamorization-of-productivity/

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/09/24/pers-s24.html

https://www.npr.org/2021/09/24/1039676445/laziness-does-not-exist-devon-price

Independence related:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240224035644/https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/independence-is-an-ableist-myth-unlocking-the-power-of-community-in-healing/

https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice/

Covid related:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewpulrang/2022/01/31/6-ways-responses-to-covid-19-have-been-ableist-and-why-it-matters/

https://www.mencap.org.uk/press-release/eight-10-deaths-people-learning-disability-are-covid-related-inequality-soars

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/03/09/xdvx-m09.html?pk_kwd=wsws

https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/it-was-emergency-planning-that-was-vulnerable-during-covid-not-disabled-people-inquiry-is-told/

https://www.donotpanic.news/p/its-all-out-war-on-the-vulnerable?utm_source=publication-search

https://www.donotpanic.news/p/mass-disabling-event-denial?utm_source=publication-search

Internalized ableism:

https://www.neurodiverging.com/what-is-internalized-ableism-neurodivergent-people-need-to-know/

https://www.autisticparentsuk.org/post/overcoming-internalised-ableism

Other/general:

https://www.fullspectrumchildcare.com/blog/to-be-a-radical-crip-and-the-power-in-identifying-as-one

https://deathsbywelfare.org/

https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/08/06/forced-intimacy-an-ableist-norm/

https://privateplacespublicspacesblog.wordpress.com/about-the-project/

https://www.euronews.com/2023/06/05/i-see-the-scar-and-i-want-to-die-why-the-eu-allows-sterilisation-of-women-with-disabilitie

https://blueannoyed.wordpress.com/2024/04/30/welcome-to-the-crip-warehouse/

https://www.womenspress.com/what-can-feminists-make-of-the-eugenicist-history-of-abortion/

https://level.medium.com/disability-justice-is-an-essential-part-of-abolishing-police-and-prisons-2b4a019b5730

https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/images/other-images/9781452963495_intro.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354037224_Destroying_Disability_Expanding_Application_of_the_Genocide_Convention

https://alexschadenberg.blogspot.com/2024/03/scotlands-deceptive-euthanasia-bill.html?m=1&mibextid=K35XfP

https://disability-memorial.org/

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/dec/09/from-the-wheelchair-using-black-panther-to-the-cripple-suffragette-10-heroes-of-the-disabled-rights-movement

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2020/jun/24/you-cant-pay-cash-here-how-cashless-society-harms-most-vulnerable

https://themighty.com/topic/disability/tweet-thread-straw-bans-disability/

https://medium.com/@thorafelicitybell/our-environmentalism-has-to-be-intersectional-4cf824ab2aa4

https://www.eater.com/2018/7/19/17586742/plastic-straw-ban-disabilities

https://www.bvanudgeconsulting.com/bias-of-the-week/just-world-hypothesis/

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago

lol, It is not too much at all. I mean, I won't be reading it all at once, but I love having resources

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's always nice to meet a fellow link collector lol

I'll admit it might be a while since I've read some of these myself (or in the case of the book pdf - not fully yet) so they might not all be up to date, but the gist should still stand.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago

Fat shaming is likely to be the most difficult to combat, because it's based on an unhealthy condition anyone can slip into, so it has a warning component similar to drunk-driving shaming, the Darwin awards, various "fails", etc. where people suffer the consequences of their own choices.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

it’s based on an unhealthy condition anyone can slip into

I am not saying this is what you believe, but you're right that people for sure over simplify it into that, and say things like "just eat less and exercise more." The truth is much more complicated. There are a ton of factors involved and often people have unrelated conditions they can't get help with because doctors will just say "you just need to lose weight."

https://www.npr.org/2022/06/23/1107166691/medical-bias-against-obesity-is-preventing-patients-from-receiving-proper-care

That and a lot of "overweight" people are not unhealthy.

https://www.science.org/content/article/obesity-doesn-t-always-mean-ill-health-here-s-what-scientists-are-learning

As usual, the truth is far less cut and dry as people think, and should just stop shaming people for it.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

When I say "based on", I mean that there are some cases where overweight is actually unhealthy, and some otherwise healthy people can, for a series of reasons, become unhealthy.

The problem about shaming above-average BMI people, is that it has two extremes:

  • on one hand, a thin-cult that leads to eating disorders
  • on the other, "fat activists" and "plus size" models dying of heart attacks at ages of 40 and under

What I believe, is that the shaming itself is a bigoted take on a warning against the latter. My point was that it's going to take extra effort to remove the bigoted behavior, when there is a valid reason to have a warning.

Ideally, we should get to a point where the root cause of unhealthy behaviors could be addressed directly, but we're like two or three layers away from that.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 10 points 6 months ago

The US is fascist now. Lots of inappropriate stuff us making a comeback.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't see it. But then, I haven't been on Reddit for almost a whole year now and by all accounts, it's devolved into a right-leaning, bot-filled shitbox even more than it was when I left. The WSB crowd never had a problem with that word before, and by now those are the only type of user truly left there that isn't some kind of AI.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

The WSB community and related ones used the r-word self-referentially for the most part.

[-] Ignacio@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago

What word are you referring to?

[-] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Adding it here as spoilered text

spoilerretarded

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We know that moderation standards have gotten worse, recently. Pick a random big web community hosting company, and it's likely find that they have laid off big parts of their content moderation team, in the last 24 months.

In spite of the evidence of both my professional expertise, and simple observation; I have received many assurances that AI is definitely picking up the slack.

I say this as some defense of the average human. The algorithms and staff that pair us with each other online for communication have undoubtedly gotten substantially worse, recently.

It's possible that the average living human has not actually gotten worse... Okay, I'll admit, I think they totally have. I think all that lead paint expose "that didn't hurt us" is finally kicking into full force for many of us.

Edit: I see some correlation - the average CEO getting scammed into bad AI purchases is the right age for the lead explanation...

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

I have been noticing and pondering this as well.

My only thought is that perhaps, although it was shamed for a while, the people who used it at it's peak have continued to use it in private settings. But now their children are of age that they are comfortable spouting it on the Internet and in person, thus bringing out anyone else who wants to say it, whether just to make people uncomfortable or they grew up with it, or otherwise don't know any better or haven't learned empathy

[-] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't know exactly why its usage would come up more frequently again. But I feel bad because when I grew up, the word was used frequently, and I never made the connection to it being offensive.

I'm always terrified I'm going to say it or something else that could hurt someone or offend them. Like I wouldn't want to make someone feel bad because I'm being foolish.

On the flip side, I've never been one to let words hold so much power over me. I feel like words and language are very flexible, and so words don't bother me unless I know someone intentionally is trying to be rude towards me.

But again, that's just me, and I know for others that's not the case. So, I'm always trying to be mindful. I guess what I'm trying to say is that some people using it might not realise how it can make others feel. So try not to take it all to heart. Hopefully, it's just a phase that will pass soon enough.

Edit: one thing I have noticed is as political tensions have risen over the past decade, I feel like I've seen way more discourse online in general. I suppose that could just be a coincidence. It could be just due to more people having access to the internet overall. One thing I found when I used reddit a lot, was that sometimes young people could be the rudest and most hurtful. I sometimes wonder if it's just due to a developing brain and the emotional fluctuations people can get in their teens? I don't know

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Yep, I see it on Lemmy all the time, often from Shit.just.works users.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not seeing it... but it might be due to Reddit having become the R word for me, never having been into T (𝕏), refusing to go on TT or D, and FB still having wide whack-a-mole word filters (main issue being flerfers, and "praise God for the AI stairs" kind). Haven't seen it on the fediverse yet, but that might be due to curation.

[-] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah I also think its probably because beehaw in general has a really moderated community space in general so not much negativity breaks through the cracks.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Also beehaw members had to "write an essay (sic)" to join, and that barely larger threshold seems to have people value it more.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7507 readers
11 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS