381
submitted 2 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 555@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Just 20? Not 21? What if they are small, can I bring more? We have to have enough for the entire class, and kids are lightweights.

[-] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Pearls clutched!

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago
[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

And as long as they aren't being given/sold to minors, I don't care! I'm sure half the teachers have harder stuff on hand anyway.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

I see that you, too, have met a lot of teachers outside of the classroom as an adult.

[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Which school, exactly? Asking for a friend.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Hey, elementary school kids need connections for weed just like everybody else, so I'm sure that will happen all the time.

Also, if you give cops "qualified immunity" they might decide to start murdering innocent people for no reason and get away with it. Only that happens to be true.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Promises promises.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

That's enough to share with the class! I mean, if you're going to bring it to school, you have to bring enough to share. Those are the rules of schools.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Does it ever occur to anyone to just say, "that doesn't make any sense and is probably a distortion"?

[-] PancakeTrebuchet@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Seeing as his supporters believe they're destined to spend eternity in flames, unless a man in a robe puts water on their heads, because a rib woman was once convinced by a talking snake to eat magical fruit, I'm thinking no.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Don't forget you have to eat God converted into crackers and wine after telling the robe man all your secrets.

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Correct, but other laws still prohibit distribution to minors, and smoking near the building. So all it allows is keeping them on your person or with your belongings to eventually be consumed elsewhere. Doing anything with them that could be harmful to children would still be illegal.

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Spicoli and Mr Hand would like a word…

[-] moonlight@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

higher education...

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

"I hope you brought enough for everyone"

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That's as many as two tens!

[-] Feliskatos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Interesting the bill doesn't allow home growing.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Also:

How the court let that language on the ballot, I will never understand. You read the language, it does not do justice.

Yeah, IMAGINE, allowing people to decide, for themselves, if they want actual freedom. I mean, there is just no justice any more.

[-] Raxiel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So... If the school is underwater, the joints will be ruined? 4d chess move right there!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
381 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18601 readers
5836 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS