this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
114 points (99.1% liked)

News

36086 readers
4943 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

“A major reason for the decline is the upstream water diversion for agriculture and households,” Hall said. Populations in the states that rely on Great Basin water supplies have grown by 6% to 18% since 2010, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. “As the population increases, so does water use.”

There's a finite amount that can be done about agriculture, though you can do covered agriculture.

But we still have lawns, which is a significant chunk of water use.

Way back when the British colonists showed up in North America, they brought with them the tradition of the grass lawn. That was predicated on an England-like climate. That kind of works on the East Coast, but is a terrible mismatch for the American Southwest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawn

It was not until the 17th and 18th century that the garden and the lawn became a place created first as walkways and social areas. They were made up of meadow plants, such as camomile, a particular favourite. In the early 17th century, the Jacobean epoch of gardening began; during this period, the closely cut "English" lawn was born. By the end of this period, the English lawn was a symbol of status of the aristocracy and gentry.

Wealthy families in America during the late 18th century also began mimicking English landscaping styles. British settlers in North America imported an affinity for landscapes in the style of the English lawn.

Before the mechanical lawn mower, the upkeep of lawns was possible only for the extremely wealthy estates and manor houses of the aristocracy. Labor-intensive methods of scything and shearing the grass were required to maintain the lawn in its correct state, and most of the land in England was required for more functional, agricultural purposes.

This all changed with the invention of the lawn mower by Edwin Beard Budding in 1830.

Lawns began to proliferate in America from the 1870s onwards. As more plants were introduced from Europe, lawns became smaller as they were filled with flower beds, perennials, sculptures, and water features. Eventually the wealthy began to move away from the cities into new suburban communities. In 1856, an architectural book was published to accompany the development of the new suburbia that placed importance on the availability of a grassy space for children to play on and a space to grow fruits and vegetables that further imbued the lawn with cultural importance. Lawns began making more appearances in development plans, magazine articles, and catalogs. The lawn became less associated with being a status symbol, instead giving way to a landscape aesthetic. Improvements in the lawn mower and water supply enabled the spread of lawn culture from the Northeast to the South, where the grass grew more poorly.

Maintaining a green lawn sometimes requires large amounts of water. While natural rainfall is usually sufficient to maintain a lawn's health in the temperate British Isles- the birthplace of the concept of the lawn- in times of drought hosepipe bans may be implemented by the water suppliers. Conversely, exportation of the lawn ideal to more arid regions (e.g. U.S. Southwest and Australia) strains water supply systems when water supplies are already scarce. This necessitates upgrades to larger, more environmentally invasive equipment to deal with increased demand due to lawn watering. Grass typically goes dormant during periods of cold or heat outside of its preferred temperature ranges; dormancy reduces the grasses' water demand. Most grasses typically recover quite well from a drought, but many property owners become concerned about the brown appearance and increase watering during the summer months. Water in Australia observed 1995 data that up to 90% of the water used in Canberra during summer drought periods was used for watering lawns.

In the United States, 50 to 70% of residential water is used for landscaping, with most used to water lawns. A 2005 NASA study estimated conservatively 128,000 square kilometres (49,000 sq mi; 32,000,000 acres) of irrigated lawn in the US, three times the area of irrigated corn. That translates to about 200 US gallons (760 L; 170 imp gal) of drinking-quality fresh water per person per day is required to keep up United States' lawn surface area.

In 2022, the state of Nevada pass a bill that not only banned the installation of new lawns in the state, but also mandated the removal of any lawn deemed "nonfunctional." This was in response to a years-long drought in the state. 

Having lawns in the middle of the desert kinda requires pulling enough water out of aquifers and constantly dumping it on the ground to produce an English biome, which isn't really sustainable -- the aquifers recharge much more slowly than our present rate of extraction.

Maybe it's possible to do something like mass desalination and transport from the ocean, but that's gonna cost more...and even if we want to do that, there probably still has to be a reduction in lawn area at some point.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Permanently Deleted

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Trying to have a green lawn in a desert is pretty fucking stupid, you ask me.

Rock gardens are low maintenance.

But it’s even dumber trying to grow water ~~intestines~~ intensive crops in a fucking desert

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

intensive, unless you're growing some kind of laxative.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They do grow a lot of fruit, just saying. (Thanks, I missed that auto incorrect,)

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So, there's probably always gonna need to be some watered, grassy fields. Grass is rapidly self-healing, grows quickly. You want to play sports on a sports field, you probably want to do it on grass, and AstroTurf is kind of a disappointing alternative.

We have the water available to do small parks, even in the desert. We can let people have access to a grass surface.

But doing it all over an entire suburb is really water-intensive. And a lot of people aren't actually out walking on their yard's grass and tearing it up, so they don't need the rapid self-healing that it offers.

California in particular -- with large population centers in arid landscape -- has seen some movement on xeriscaping, doing landscaping that still looks nice -- even if it's not as tolerant of being walked on. But it's still really not a norm.

EDIT: And one perk of doing something other than lawns is that lawns are really maintenance-intensive. Because they grow so quickly, the same thing that lets them repair damage from being walked on quickly, they also have to be mowed all the time to keep them short. Most plants that are okay with less water usage don't require nearly as much upkeep.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

“Looks like we need to defund WoKe NASA” - Repubes