82
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

3% fewer insects this year than last year

1/3 the birds of 40 years ago

99% of land mammal biomass humans or livestock

about 50% more volume of boat in the ocean than of fish

it'll all be over faster than you think

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

99% of land mammal biomass humans or livestock

uhh technically its 96% very-smart

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] iByteABit@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago

Great point, we can start with you

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Atlantic, known for the phrase "killing children can be legal"

[-] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago

These articles always imagine themselves exempt from their argument.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

It's like he just assumes the billionaire class is going to swoop in and protect him and everybody he loves due to his obviously superior genes and massively over-developed brain.

[-] lil_tank@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

Correct me if I'm wrong but "extinction" is not a "force" of destruction right? Extinction is the result of destruction, it's a state of being not an actor

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

If FernGully taught me anything it's that extinction is Tim Curry and he's not doing too hot these days

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Yes, but this lets them obfuscate what the force is

[-] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

"destruction is also a creative urge" - bakunin

[-] Cunigulus@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

Extinction is literally the loss of biodiversity. What the absolute fuck?

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

Humans need to accept that bad things are good, actually

[-] TheWurstman@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

They’re probably talking on a several million year time scale these lunatics think humanity will make it that long probably

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The answer is the intuitive one: We absolutely need to be worried about what humans are doing to the planet. But we should be worried about the transformations we’re causing and all the destruction of ecosystem services that they entail, not because extinction is inherently bad, but—first and foremost—because these transformations might well destroy us.

What a pointless waste of time and energy to write this article. "Extinction isn't bad unless, of course, we're eating at the very foundations of human existence, in which case it is in fact bad."

Also his pinned tweet is a link to an article claiming global warming would have been worse under socialism.

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

Did The Atlantic grow this toxic fucker in a lab test tube? - https://xcancel.com/leigh_phillips

A recent tweet

I must be doing something right if an article I write prompts the climate denialists to accuse me of eugenics, the degrowthers to accuse me of being a Big Oil shill, and the Hamasniks to do their usual thing. (Note that the article on extinction does not at all reference Isr/Pal)

The same person who is for mass extinction is against Palestinian armed resistance.

https://xcancel.com/Leigh_Phillips/status/1810805850145181952#m

[-] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

He wrote People's Republic of Walmart. I want the people of the global south whose homes will be underwater soon to be allowed to execute him and Matt Huber.

[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

I would say most of the time Leigh's takes are correct, but some of his opinions are definitely questionable (particularly on Palestine as you've pointed out). He is very, very well read, and his book Austerity Ecology is pretty much the definitive guide for eco-modernism. He's highly educated, and presents some unorthodox opinions on climate change (he is - strangely - quite optimistic about our ability to curb it, and backs up everything he says with evidence, which I appreciate)

On the other hand, there's shit like this lol.

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

Phillips wears his antagonism on his sleeve throughout, referring to Transition folk, degrowthers and the wide spectrum of the Green/alternative economics world as "anti-packaging jihadis", "degrowth militants", "green Mr Magoos", and "an army of tattooed-and-bearded, twelve-dollar-farmers’-market-marmalade-smearing, kale-bothering, latter-day Lady Bracknells"

I'm gonna go with a thanks but no thanks on Austerity Ecology

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

If you're doing a bit I have admit - whoosh - it went straight over my head.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

Ohhh, so humans etching that HS-boundary* in fossil records is so that ~~our~~ crab or chicken descendants in 10 or so million years will marvel at the biodiversity boom happening in their time??
We must be the kindest species ever, so selfless!
I hope no one and nothing remembers us.

*the homo sapiens boundary can be identified by the distinctive concentration of plastics & PFAS, as well as a sharp fall of biodiversity in the sediments above it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh cool so the Atlantic is publishing Gary Oldman's monolog about destruction from the Fifth Element... cool, cool.

[-] Annakah38@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago
[-] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

1000 years gulag

[-] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who could've thought that Leigh Phillips would write something like this ... lol. Is he even pretending to be a socialist still?

edit: I don't know how to spell

[-] batsforpeace@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

today in 'upsides of capitalism'

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Look, tech bros are disruptors and they're good at it. We're talkin' trillions and trillions of dollars - okay? Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Elon Musk. So they can disrupt the climate. They can do that. There will be some losers. But that's how things work. That's life. Pun intended.

[-] Red_sun_in_the_sky@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

but

Slowly cues robot rock

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15834 readers
616 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS