158
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A fleet of drones patrolling New York City’s beaches for signs of sharks and struggling swimmers is drawing backlash from an aggressive group of seaside residents: local shorebirds.

Since the drones began flying in May, flocks of birds have repeatedly swarmed the devices, forcing the police department and other city agencies to adjust their flight plans. While the attacks have slowed, they have not stopped completely, fueling concern from wildlife experts about the impact on threatened species nesting along the coast.

Veronica Welsh, a wildlife coordinator at the Parks Department, said the birds were “very annoyed by the drones” from the moment they arrived on the beach.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Y'all are making a joke out of this headline but it really sucks

But he was quick to raise a far more dire possibility: that the drones could prompt a stress response in some birds that causes them to flee the beach and abandon their eggs, as several thousand elegant terns did following a recent drone crash in San Diego.

It's honestly so horrible that this was approved. Drones are banned in National Parks for a reason. Birds have very few beach areas left where they can nest.

[-] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Up voting because this kind of thing needs coverage.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Now we are going to need some green pigs to counter the angry birds.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Nobody tell Cody JohnsTon

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago
[-] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Drone on drone warfare! Makes you wonder what sort of cold war is playing out.

#BirdsArentReal

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

I fly drones for work and seagulls in particular are always checking it out and being all aggressive around it. Fuckers can't fly upwards nearly as fast as the drone though so it's easy enough to leave them in the dust. They never actually make contact though but it's still annoying.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

wow you suck. drones are really terrible for birds. least you could do is have empathy, but nah.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just to be clear, while I'm joking around here to make a funny, you're 100% right and I do everything in my power to be as little intrusive as I can especially in actual natural areas. The birds I'm talking about here are city-rat-style seagulls, they're not in any danger, in fact if you read the subtext of my original comment, you'll notice I fly away from them immediately which is the correct thing to do for both them and the drone. Also I'm currently taking steps to move into new niches in my work so I don't need to fly so often, because while I do love it I recognise it bothers people and wildlife and don't really want to do it more than I absolutely need to.

[-] Smc87 2 points 1 month ago
[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Us humans stole pretty much all their habitat.

[-] Smc87 1 points 1 month ago

I wanted that chip bad enough that I stomped on the bird.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Oh wow so cool and edgy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extinct_bird_species_since_1500

About 129 species of birds have become extinct since 1500,[1] and the rate of extinction seems to be increasing.

It's tragic. People get up in arms about tomato soup on famous paintings ... this is even worse because every species taken out of the ecosystem is a lost node in a complex web that sustains us, lost species represent a loss of learning about the world we live in. There are so many interesting behaviors, chemical pathways, beautiful animals, who are going to be gone forever.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

About 129 species of birds have become extinct since 1500,[1] and the rate of extinction seems to be increasing.

I don't think he stomped on all of them...

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nah but this kind of dismissive attitude definitely leads to extinctions.

[-] Smc87 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Smc87 1 points 1 month ago

They should have thought about that before my chips

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Fuck birds. They had their chance 65 million years ago.

Plus they keep pooping on my car.

[-] Agrivar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Fucking drones. I don't care what they're being used for, every time one is being flown at the beach I frequent it's a nuisance.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"the drones could prompt a stress response in some birds that causes them to flee the beach and abandon their eggs"

Solution is self evident:

Use the drones to hatch the eggs and raise the chicks. :) Very, very, confused chicks...

[-] pageflight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I wonder what semi-autonomous aircraft have the least impact on birds. Fixed-wing (planes) are much more efficient and, not coincidentally, often a lot quieter. For patrolling and looking for sharks/swimmers, seems like they might work as well or better.

Also I wonder if drones offer any demonstrated benefit over lifeguards.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Balloons, probably. Like a WWI reconnaissance blimp. With modern optics that thing could survey the entire beach without moving.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Based gulls

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well now you need to make drones to fight off the seagulls. Those things are fucking vile anyway so, have fun lol

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Gulls are an integral part of the beach ecosystem, and far less obnoxious than nature-hating people.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
158 points (98.8% liked)

News

22488 readers
3913 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS