320

The 45 most incoherent lines from Donald Trump’s rambling Rose Garden speech (July 15, 2020) (www.cnn.com)

submitted 5 months ago by KevonLooney@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Remember this shit? Fucking vote.

President Donald Trump stood in front of the White House press corps on Tuesday afternoon and vented.

What was billed as a press conference rapidly turned into a quasi-campaign event, with the President of the United States free-associating about his general election opponent, the state of the country and the media. Even by Trump standards, it was a shocking performance – suggesting a level of volatility and unpredictability that has to terrify Republicans trying to run and win campaigns while sharing the same ballot with Trump in November.

“Because you talk about a certain power of the telephone and the calls where they would call and say, no, we don’t want to do that.”

“That basically means no windows, no nothing. It’s very hard to do. I tell people when they want to go into some of these buildings, how are your eyes because they won’t be good in five years.”

“But you can’t make a left anymore and come into the United States loaded up with human traffic.”

top 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

When will donnie step down? He's the oldest candidate and he was already declining in 2020.

[+] autotldr@lemmings.world -19 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

“Our view of the length and severity of the economic downturn has deteriorated considerably from the assumptions used last quarter.” – Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Sharf, Tuesday.

Quick reminder: This was a press conference, ostensibly, to talk about Trump signing executive orders about Hong Kong and China.

The original article contains 2,098 words, the summary contains 127 words. Saved 94%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago

Wow I've never seen this bot just completely fail this badly before

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Reading brainrot does that to you

[-] superkret@feddit.org 32 points 5 months ago

Smart bot, filtered out all the bullshit.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 22 points 5 months ago

I get it bot.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Bot, are you OK?

[+] maniii@lemmy.world -42 points 5 months ago

I will probably say this for this one time,

Drumpf voters will vote for him to "Watch the world burn".

Dems and the DNC in-actions caused this dilemma, crazy situation, scenario playing out. Biden is Elder abuse. Kamala is unliked. Anyone can become DNC/Dem Nominee and win. AND NO SHILLARY WILL NEVER WIN. EVERYONE KNOWS YOU WILL NEVER SUPPORT BERNIE or even only one of his policies.

Change is better if backed up with immediate Executive-Order immediate Action, immediate Policies rather than Senate-House-Commitee disenfranchisement.

The shooter is a moron and electrified the MAGA QNON crowd.

Just asking people to "Vote" is no longer good enough. Give/Sign Policy --> Effective if Biden/Dem nominee is re-elected. Ask those State Voters what else they want. Give/Sign Policy --> Effective if Biden/Dem nominee wins. Do it AT EVERY STATE. DO THE THING AND GET PEOPLE WHAT THEY NEED. SIGN IT ! STOP DICKING AROUND "Vote" "Vote" "Im not that Guy" "Im not MAGA" "Im not Drumpf"

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 32 points 5 months ago

Vote anyway

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

You seem like an AI trained on Trump tweets.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Off your meds again?

[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 5 months ago

Your comment kinda reads like the Timecube website.

[-] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

What you just said... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling incoherent response were you even close to anything that can be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this ~~room~~ thread is now dumber for having ~~listened to~~ read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024

320 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19233 readers

2182 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News