137

Like ok. When I was a lib, I had a lot of communist values already. I was already socdem leaning (though an Obama supporter because I foolishly believed he stood for those values). The vast majority of times I moved left involved some sort of confrontation with a person to my left on an issue. Sometimes there was resistance on my part, but that usually involved just like, a single argument, me realizing they were right, and moving left on the issue. Other times it was just... receiving information I didnt previously know. The closer to ML I got, the harder the struggles were, as some of the current geopolticial issues and also historical issues involved in that were the hardest to deprogram and the most hard coded. But I still got there.

Even simply openly calling myself as a communist was as simple as seeing someone else on Tumblr openly do so and realizing "oh wait thats an option?"

Oddly, "lesser evilism is not actually the correct way to approach electorally" was kind of my final gate? Despite being a poster here I sort of secretly still was a lesser evilist up until the recent stuff with Gaza. So it wasnt a straight line admittedly, but what it did do was give me a certain line of thinking about what the mindset of people who vote Democrat were.

In the midst of autistic myopia, I sort of for a long time believed that most libs were "communists in waiting" too. I sort of assumed you just had to spread the word, and they'd get there. Maybe they'd struggle on some of the same points I did, like not automatically believing a protest movement is good because its a protest movement, or that "America bad" isnt actually a bad way of thinking and critically supporting anti-American forces in the world is in fact the correct thing to do, and of course as I mentioned lesser evilism. But for the most part, you just had to give them permission to be communist. You just had to normalize it.

So seeing liberals like, be presented with the option to move left and slamming the door closed violently. Even on the most basic and obvious things. It was disheartening. I really thought it would be easier than that!

Theres this recent awful trend on TikTok (one Ive mostly only just heard of, because I'm not on that platform) of people "turning in their leftist card" over real leftists not flocking to support Harris and being principled about opposing genocide. One particular one, the only one I've seen with my own eyes, was a guy saying he "just found out he's not a leftist, he's a liberal, and [he's] turning in [his] leftist card". Like, whats happening there is a liberal is learning for the first time that he's a liberal. But like, my experience with that realization was to go "oh, so THATS what leftism is? OK. let me travel there" (yaknow, like I said, on average lol, it wasnt always that easy). So seeing the door slam for me is kinda weird? Still to this day despite being somewhat used to it now?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Red_Eclipse@hexbear.net 55 points 3 weeks ago

I relate to a lot of this, and I do wonder if it's an autism thing. Because like, I see a lot of lefties complain about libs as if they know they're thinly veiled fascists and are just pretending/virtue signaling etc, and they're always linking roderic day's thing about propaganda. But my experience was just nothing like that. It's like.... no, I literally just did not know lol. I always had good egalitarian-like values, and I was fed so much bullshit that I was just naively a liberal. I was a radlib for sooooo long because of all the other western 'leftists' being stuck in electoralism, defeatism, 'human-nature'-ism etc. The final thing that pushed me here was:

Wait, you mean communism ISN'T when no food?

Wait, you mean communism actually DID work and wasn't just a 1984 animal farm dictatorship ???

Wait, you mean it wasn't us libbies on the "right side of history", it was always the socialists, and basically every good historical 'great man' idol that we look up to (MLK, helen keller, einstein etc) was a socialist too??

THE COMMIES WERE RIGHT THIS WHOLE FREAKIN TIME????

Because my entire life I've been taught commie = evil, like, they're just The Bad Guys. It's drilled into your head. And then when you come up with something like "hey why don't we provide for everybody and make things fair?" it's always: "Nah, that doesn't work, it's been tried, and human beings are just too selfish to make it work."

And that had younger me like "Oh, okay... :( "

And our entire culture, media, news, history education etc is SUCH A FUCK that it took THIS LONG for me to finally get some real facts and be like wtf are you kidding me?!?!? The "villains" were right this whole time?!?!

Maybe it is like an autistic myopia for us. Maybe most people aren't like this...? I know it's more accurate that people's ideology follows their material interests, and for most of us westoids, our material interests are the empire staying an empire. And you could say that because I'm disabled, that means my material interests 100% align with the abolition of capitalism, therefore here I am. But there's definitely an element of like, bruh I did not KNOW. I wish somebody had told me sooner. But it's a wasteland out here in the west. I ultimately had to figure it out for myself.

And I'm glad I did, because unknowingly being a "communist waiting for permission to be one" is depressing as HELL man. I saw the BS of electoralism, reforms obviously were not working, I knew the necessity of revolution but I could NOT believe that it was ever possible, like the belief that humans are selfish and it just never works was so ingrained. So I literally felt like there was no hope. Absolutely nothing. We're just fucked and this is it and we're powerless to do anything about it. Total capitalist realism. The bleakest view of reality. Did you also go through this phase of utter despair like I did?

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 47 points 3 weeks ago

The "human nature" shit is such BS, too. Like we know a lot about how humans lived in prehistoric times. They were not, in fact, selfish assholes lol. And it turns out children are naturally prone to be empathetic and will share things almost instinctively. We just beat those instincts out of them by the time they reach kindergarten.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 43 points 3 weeks ago

I tend to hear the "human nature" morshupls from people that also contend that the best possible system is one that rewards the worst aspects of "human nature" and encourages more of the worst. cap-think

[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

Why do these people never talk about making a system that rewards good parts of "human nature", like caring about other people or valuing them? Hm, I wonder...

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's the ongoing pursuit of moral justifications for what they already wanted to do. capitalist-laugh

[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

hey i think i do that too! but i don't want to starve minorities to death so...

[-] NoLeftLeftWhereILive@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago

Well same! I remember after first reading Marx as a teen I was like "well all this makes complete sense and this is what I want the world to be" only to be told from left and right that "sure sure sure, but all that is just UtOpiaN!" That you can sure be this utopian idealist, but none of it will work "in the real world" and nobody will take you seriously. This weird invalidation of my utopian idealist wordview just got to me for a long time, very long, but I still moved left consistently. I should have examined what this was a lot sooner tbh. But I had not read any real theory or heard real history, not really.

[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

are we all clones???

[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago

I literally read the communist manifesto and immediately became a communist with no further hesitation. It literally answered all of my questions and cleared up all of my concerns, because I was genuinely under the impression that "communism was when no food" and "communism is when authority"

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

I see a lot of lefties complain about libs as if they know they're thinly veiled fascists and are just pretending/virtue signaling

Yeah I admit my past makes this very frusterating to me. And also like, the freinds I have that are still libs and I know are fairly well meaning people overall, just misguided on some points. Ive never been as much of a fan of that kind of rhetoric.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bobson_Dugnutt@hexbear.net 33 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah honestly I don't understand how any adult can be paying attention to how the world works and not be a communist, but I guess people like to believe in comforting fairy tales like liberalism. Lately I've been getting into arguments with liberals when I criticize Harris, and they act like I've insulted them personally.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

you have insulted them personally by making them say the rest of the phrase "I'm as left as they come, but"

a liberal cannot allow space to his left to exist. those are all bots and paid trolls over there.

[-] Bobson_Dugnutt@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

Any political strategy other than Sorkin-like reasonable debate and compromise is scary and probably Russian

[-] spacecadet@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago

For a USian liberal, voting for Harris is like receiving absolution from your sins, like going to a confessional on Sunday then continuing to sin on Monday. You cannot remove this absolution from them or they will be forced to confront their unearned privilege of existing in an evil neocolonial empire.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago

I had a similar phase when I was a lot younger. My turning point was probably working construction out of high school. This was further reinforced the following summer when I did work on an assembly line and a wrecking yard. The thing I noticed was how little "liberals" actually cared about the people I worked with. They'd say they supported immigrants, but then the immigrants I worked with had jobs outside of what we were doing. I'd be exhausted at the end of my shift, would go home, shower, eat, then go to sleep. But there were motherfuckers out there who were going to their next gig

I'd try to explain this to people (white people especially) what others were going through. And so-called progressives would look at me in disbelief. Or use terms like "unskilled." Made me realize "Oh...we are not actually the same. You're just upset you're not on top of the food chain, not that the food chain exists."

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago

There are a lot of anti-capitalist people who call themselves liberals because they have not realised that they should be calling themselves communists.

Like a shitload of them.

The barrier is permission and brainworms.

[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

i blame conservatives for trying to use communism as an insult

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] m532@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago

It was very similar for me.

I became a communist the day I found lemmygrad.

Then I told everyone about it. I thought they would also become communist if they knew the same I knew.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago

I used to be such a naive liberal that I seriously believed that evil simply did not exist, and the closest thing to evil was just ignorance. By that, I meant that anyone with sufficient knowledge simply would not choose to do harmful things to other people or to the planet if only they knew better.

That idealism took a serious scorching hit around 1999 when I learned that some people with tear gas know exactly what tear gas does and how tear gas feels and that tear gas isn't really necessary to apply to people that were already cuffed and otherwise unable to fight back. pepsi thumb-cop

I saw the looks on those faces. They knew what they were doing and they were savoring it like hogs at the trough.

My journey leftward was still a journey but that was quite a first step.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

that I seriously believed that evil simply did not exist, and the closest thing to evil was just ignorance.

Yeah I believed essentially this for a long time. Like I'm pretty sure bullshit like "Hitler thought he was doing the right thing" came out of my mouth at some point.

I mean to some extent I still struggle with it. I have a hard time believing that "regular people" that I meet and can interact with can just be straight up evil. I still can only feel that way about historical figures and politicans and famous sex pests (and even then, only the worst ones) and such. I prefer to believe people are misguided in most cases. My mind tends to relate to why people think that way. And I mean, I am a stubborn rehabilitation and restoration guy when it comes to justice to this day, but now thats somewhat curtailed by the knowledge that some people cant be rehabilated, its just better to stick to it as a policy for a state.

That point about tear gas is good though.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I believed essentially this for a long time. Like I'm pretty sure bullshit like "Hitler thought he was doing the right thing" came out of my mouth at some point.

I believed exactly that once upon a time, that even Hitler surely had the best possible intentions and he was just mistaken.

I mean to some extent I still struggle with it.

Me too. Sometimes I have to stop, check my own presumptions, and remember not everyone actually wants others around them to be happy and well, that some people outright crave the pain and death of others, and that appealing to compassion that simply isn't there was a fool's errand when dealing with such monsters.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, one more thing about Hitler: learning that he "loved" the German people so much that he ordered them to die and be annihilated once they "failed" his hubris-laden megalomania made me realize that such monsters don't even love what they claim they love, not when such "loved" ones cease feeding the insatiable hole in themselves.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Depending on your definition of evil, I still think evil doesn't exist. I think people are products of their circumstances, and that's the end of it really. Many people of course are malicious, but only because their ape brains learned from the world to be that way. Improving those circumstances for everyone is consequently the most important pursuit to reducing what would be the closest thing I'd label as 'evil'.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I partially agree with you, though previously I saw it from a paradoxically "rationalist(tm)" point of view that because I couldn't distill evil particles into a test tube that evil as a concept simply could not exist, not even as a broad-brushed way of comprehending the phenomenon of people choosing to hurt people for the sake of hurting them.

ape brains

Yes, we are primates, though way too often, both libs and chuds like pulling the "nature" card to justify their own selfishness, so I tend to shy away from such terminology myself, even if technically correct. Besides, especially when it comes to cruel Mengele-like experiments on primate brains by my-hero startup grifts, primates also deserve better. monke-beepboop

EDIT: Also, the more harmful and dangerous kinds of Cluster-B personality disorders, the kind that tend to be associated most closely with what literature has called "evil" for millennia, have a genetic component as well as an environmental one. Not everyone in the same environment turns out the same way; I think that's too much a simplification.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

And if we really got stuck arguing the "human nature" topic with someone there's plenty of evidence of sharing in nature when own needs are met. If people's (shared of course) subjective experience of most humans = selfish dicks is evidence at all, it is equally evidence of human nature being subject to the environment it lives in. Yaknow, a fucking hellhole

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

I think much of the suffering and precarity that most people experience under late stage capitalism isn't just a happy accident and is deliberately perpetuated so that people never have the energy or means to punch upward. It's why porky-happy needs at least so much unemployment at all times, for example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

Also, the more harmful and dangerous kinds of Cluster-B personality disorders, the kind that tend to be associated most closely with what literature has called "evil" for millennia, have a genetic component as well as an environmental one.

The potential for people to be - even partly - innately evil is a painful concept to grapple with.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not entirely happy with it, either.

Then again, I'm not entirely happy with the paradoxically idealistic notion that every single human being would have the exact same outcome in personality if only they had the exact same amount of food, shelter, and access to amenities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

i don't think it's actually true though. like you can argue someone can be predisposed towards doing evil but there's literally always a context that could technically exist that would lead even the most "naturally evil" person to never actually do anything - or possibly even think anything - evil. There's examples of so-called sociopaths living completely normal lives out there. There's basically never an excuse for evil and that's exactly what someone being innately only capable of it is- an excuse. It implies that not only are we justified in trying to exterminate them from existence, not because of what they have done or what they believe, but because of what they were born as, and I think that's suspicious as shit. Not to mention how it would innately absolve them of their crimes, because they would literally not have a choice if they were genetically determined to do bad things! I don't want to absolve murderers and terrible people of responsibility, and saying that an evil gene exists would lead to that, there would be no way to actually blame those with the "evil gene" for what they do, and it would come down to just another "you have a bad brain" type ableist accusation. Capitalists aren't evil because they were born with the evil gene, they're evil because they're capitalists. Because they do capitalist things like exploit poor people.

I genuinely don't think "evil disorders" exist and that the only thing that does exist is disorders that can lead people to have a higher capacity for evil but due to the situational nature of reality that can be anything from being slightly more gullible than your average person to being more anxious/skeptical than your average person (two opposite traits that could both lead to evil in the right contexts). A neurotypical person could be born into a community built to turn neurotypical people into exploiters and become an exploiter, and a narcissistic sociopath could be born into a community built to turn narcissistic sociopaths into cooperative people and end up being a cooperative person.

It all comes down to us being unable to actually accomodate for what we consider "strange" neurotypes, which ends up with them being horrible people because we teach them "doing horrible shit is cool actually and you can get away with it", sometimes on accident and sometimes not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm convinced those former leftist types on tiktok are an op. The discourse on there is infuriating rn.

For me, I realized I wasn't liberal when "More and better democrats" quickly turned into "just more democrats" on DailyKos. I tended to agree with the general opinion that the left had a bunch of unserious hippies with unviable ideas, and that others like me just wanted liberals with those ideas but pursued with better political acumen.

Sanders was that liberal for me. He seemed like an obvious slam dunk fir liberal values and with the sort of career and and political acumen to make a real impact. When other libs just went in on this guy, I realized that their politics were a very shallow sort of us vs. them mentality vs. relublicans.

I quit DailyKos and found myself to what I call liteleft, which includes like Cenk Uyghur and Jimmy Dore and other cranks like that.

But those places were full of transphobes and tended to fall for fascist recruitment strategies based around that ("This PC identity politics shit is splitting the left. Check out this alt-right grifter who will onramp you to more radical shit!").

Around then, I saw some posters in r/WayOfTheBern who mentioned a place called r/chapotraphouse who were chill about trans people, and the rest was just slowly being weaned off of capitalist talking points

[-] charly4994@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

Sorta similar for me, once Bernie ran in 2016 socialism became kinda non-taboo and once I started looking it was very fast to just go "oh yeah capitalism does suck" after seeing the issues for a while but never really having it click. Still had a lot of brain worms to work through and still have a bunch that I probably haven't even noticed yet, but I feel like once I went anti-capitalist it took a long time for me to find out where I was in the giant pile of leftist labels. Kinda just picked up anarchism because when I still watched breadtube it seemed like the least offensive since it didn't challenge a lot of brain worms. Also I was chatting a girl up that said she was a leftist and when I self identified as an MLM she ghosted me. Then after kinda running with it, learning more and doing more self crit and reading theory COVID happened. The correct response to COVID was displayed by China and required "authoritarianism" to enact, and then it was just kinda like the last piece fell out and now I'm what I would've called a tankie back in 2018.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

Its always interesting what issue is people's breaking point. For me it was Mike Brown and the Ferguson protests. That it was Covid for you is really interesting to me. Makes sense though.

[-] 12022081631@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I sort of for a long time believed that most libs were "communists in waiting" too

what is the context of this thought? practically speaking, and in terms of what you/we are able to accomplish for agitation and education? in that context, many of the people we meet will not become a communist

but maybe some of these people just need to see the movement in its glory, at some scale larger than one person leading by example. maybe it's a protest. maybe its a march. maybe its a small uprising. some of those people will probably be too scared and won't be moved by any of that

but what happens when time marches on and educates these people better than any one of us can on our own? will their own perception and their understanding of what is possible finally push that person to make the change for themselves? some people won't have that ability

and for those last few libs, we can quietly dream for a day when all of us stand together with imperialism defeated. most probably, not a single one of us will be alive to see that day (e: but it will happen)

all of this to say, i reserve my right to dream, even if that is all kept separate from reality

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting thread. There are a few different discussions happening but I'll just put my thoughts in one spot.


Discussion 1: There are no real liberals, they are either secretly fascist or secretly communist

Maybe this conversation was more between-the-lines than explicitly stated in this thread. But I sense it's there, so... against this potential strawman, I will claim that liberalism is in fact a valid third position, regardless of whether an individual liberal is ultimately more sympathetic to fascism or communism when contradictions force a conflict.

Part of the allure of liberalism, as contrasted with fascism and communism, is that it reaffirms a world governed by abstract laws. The basic assumption of liberalism is that humans are irrational, and therefore must be rescued by the dispassionate rule of laws, institutions, and processes. Fascism and communism reject this basic assumption because both involve human intervention over these abstractions which can run afoul (depending on one's perspective, of course). This opposition between humans and abstractions is why horseshoe theory is so easily accepted by liberals.

In those moments of history when liberals are forced to pick a side between fascism and communism, they have a few options. First, they can "go down with the ship" and fight for liberalism until they are killed or otherwise made irrelevant. Second, they can side with fascism temporarily in order to protect the institutions which they hold most important. Third, they can side with communism if they realize that their liberal ideas were only ever in service to humanist ideals, ideals which experience demonstrates are not achievable through liberalism, but possibly so with communism.


Discussion 2: Is it a sign of autism to believe other people are by default altruistic/leftist/communist?

I'm not autistic (to the best of my knowledge) and I am the same way. And unless 100% of lefties are autistic, I think it is not unique to autistic people to have this default assumption about other people. I would argue that everyone assumes that others think in the same way as them, until proven otherwise. This is the basic premise of many a TV drama and also real-life relationship troubles. Everyone thinks differently and has different life experiences, this is true without invoking neurodivergence at all.

Maybe it's true that autistic people are more empathetic on average. If that is true, I would wonder if that is directly caused by the "autistic mind" so-to-speak, or is it just that marginalization tends to make people more empathetic? (I'm assuming that most autistic people have at some point felt marginalized due to their autism, apologies if this offends someone)


Discussion 3: Is it a waste of time to recruit liberals?

I agree with @autismdragon@hexbear.net on this. If liberals can't be recruited, then who the hell is going to make up a revolution?

There are two similar but distinct issues here, and they are worth separating:

  1. The average liberal is not going to switch sides the moment they are given license to be communist, if ever
  2. The average person's ideology is determined by their material conditions, so there is no impulse for liberals to change their world view until material conditions deteriorate further

To keep this brief, I'll simply say that it is important to take the long view. For those of us who de-liberalized, it's easy to forget just how gradual the transition was, and probably how frustrating it would have appeared to leftists at the time. This is just part of the process of developing consciousness among the working class. It doesn't happen overnight. Neither is class consciousness automatic. There are those Marxists who believe that revolution is inevitable given worsening material conditions, but I believe that it is the confluence of both worsening conditions and revolutionary action which causes change. One without the other is ineffectual.

One more thought on this actually. Precisely how much worse must be the conditions of the average liberal before they convert, then? There is no bottom to the conditions of the working class, and there is no ceiling to exploitation. Things are ok in many places but they're becoming bad in a lot of the Western world, even in America, for average middle-class families.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

One particular one, the only one I've seen with my own eyes, was a guy saying he "just found out he's not a leftist, he's a liberal, and [he's] turning in [his] leftist card".

It sounds like the kind of ratcheting-right rhetoric the DNC would put out there if they wanted to paint genocide concerns as not coming from "real" liberals. It kind of tries to reframe "liberal" as positive too. Pretty effective idea. Yaknow if would be a good astroturf campaign, if that's what it was.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

My astroturf alarms didnt go off with this one, largely because of the production values being too jank lol. But youre right, it would be effective. And I think there's something inorganic about it becoming so popular on that platform.

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the impulse to push as hard and as far left as humanly possible (then just kind of keep pushing indefinitely) always existed

[-] EelBolshevikism@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

I agree with this completely too and I'm also autistic, same as @Red_Eclipse@hexbear.net. The only reason I'm leaving this as a stop level comment is because I think that way the consensus/connection there is more clear

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

No yeah I appreciate that. I wasnt sure anyone else could relate.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13418 readers
953 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS