1584
We can't be friends. (64.media.tumblr.com)
submitted 4 months ago by DougHolland@lemmy.world to c/aiop@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 163 points 4 months ago

I don't care how "nice" someone is, I'm Trans and if someone disagrees with my basic rights then they can piss off.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 117 points 4 months ago

And no decent person needs to be trans to agree.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago

If anything, any “decent person” should be angry as hell that there are people out there not being treated decently. Because that’s just fucked up.

[-] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

This is why I kept getting so angry during the pandemic. Refusing to even just wear a mask can straight up hurt, if not kill others. How can someone care so little to be unwilling to do that small of a compromise?

I had a family member refuse to visit an elderly sick family member because they'd have to wear a mask. Made me so angry. So much respect for them just evaporated.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 4 months ago

Now where I live it's illegal to wear a mask unless for a medical condition (but it's up to the cop to decide so that means White? Ok! Brown? $1000 ticket and/or jail!)

Long Island: home of the arrogant entitled asshole Trump voter.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Generally speaking, I've found people who issue incredibly hot takes on trans rights when its just an abstract issue come around when they actually start meeting and getting to know trans people.

My wife's uncle took a near-180 position on trans rights after his now-son transitioned. He'd gone on these little grumpy talk-radio fueled rants ten years ago. Now - if he still feels that way - he mostly just keeps that shit to himself. Occasionally he says something genuinely supportive or at least passively benign, to the effect of "I don't see why its such a big deal, people need to just let each other live their lives peacefully."

I also gotta say, these ideas don't crop up ex nihilo. When someone disagrees with basic human rights, its often an idea that was planted by some kind of right-wing propaganda channel. Sports Radio is a constant vector for the worst possible opinions from the sleaziest imaginable people. The AM Talk shit that gets blared across every major city is pure brain-cancer. And YouTube's algorithms are filled to burst with the smarmiest bigots on the internet, getting front-paged thanks to thick walleted bigots with an ideological incentive to propagate this crap. If this wasn't constantly in the air, attitudes towards trans people would immediately improve.

Some folks are legit blackpilled on trans rights. But when its immediate friends and family, I've found they're a lot more flexible and tolerant towards people they know than some vague fuzzy abstracted-away trans person. Once they realize what they're listening to and turn that shit off, their positions improve dramatically.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago

I can’t be friends with someone who votes against my ability to access my medication, and my rights to access healthcare and employment without discrimination. If you are voting for people who think of people like me as subhuman, then you don’t respect me enough to be my friend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago

Very, VERY much depends on HOW we disagree politically.

load more comments (39 replies)
[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 63 points 4 months ago

The entitlement of the average right winger really is something to behold.

I don't highly enforce my pronouns. Not because it doesn't effect me but because being labeled a troublemaker who is hard to get along with is a career limiting move... And some interactions are so limited that it's not worth creating social awkwardness to self advocate. Days where this happens a lot make me depressed, grumpy and eats into the energy I have reserved to enjoy my leisure time.

Which is why it is so frustrating that some people demand that calling me by my dead name or refer openly to my sex using pronouns I hate is completely consequenceless that even when I tell them the only reprocussion to them is that I will not like being around very much them they get angry. Like I am cheating them of being owed that I automatically enjoy their company.

They are so bloody sensitive that the consequence of me thinking they are kind of shit to be around is somehow a tyranny. I just wanna yell at them like dude.. You keep bringing attention to the physical body that represents my least favorite aspects of existing by mentioning directly in conversation because that's what words like "she", "her", "girl" and "woman" mean to you. You might as well be openly talking about my fucking genetalia because that is your only qualifier for using those words. You are reflecting the things I didn't like about about the experience of myself back at me. If I openly referenced your least favorite physical trait every time casually in conversation how much would you enjoy being around me?

[-] omarfw@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They are egoists who deal only in proclamation of truth.

You stating that it's even possible for you to not enjoy their company under certain conditions is offensive to their narcissistic ideals that they should be loved unconditionally by all without earning it.

You embracing an identity that falls outside their homogenous narrow-minded gender binary is offensive to their narcissistic ideals that the world should cater to them and only them.

They are people who failed to shed their ego as they emerged into adulthood and now it controls them, and they have decided to pin the blame for all of their problems on people like you. You're better off not interacting with narcissists at all. They're walking fountains of delusion and you can never say anything that will make them see you as a human being and a peer of equal value.

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Gods I would love to not interact with these narcissists... But I also would like to eat and sleep under a roof and I kind of need to pay the bills so unfortunately dealing with them is the everyday cost of doing business. Is it fair that I labor beneath additional burdens at my work because of dumb political nonsense mischaracterizing everything about people like me and people feel justified in making my life more difficult ? No. But it's a union gig that pays $15 dollars more than other jobs requiring related skills so I sell my mental health peicemeal so I have a shot at affording to keep my family secure.

I really wouldn't care if they were random people booing me on the street because then I could just avoid them but the thing is my not putting up with these people holds tangible losses and narcissists are very good at getting themselves into positions where they are the ones who sign the cheques.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 61 points 4 months ago

Politics are people’s ethics and morality applied.

It is perfectly valid to judge people over them, and to shame people because of them. Just like you’d shame someone for littering.

Or even more aptly: just like you’d shame someone for using the N word. It is perfectly legal; it is NOT acceptable.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago

100% People who think that disagreements about other people's right to exist are just matters of taste reveal how deeply hateful they are. This is not a matter for compromise.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

They'd probably go something like, "but I don't have a problem with you existing (if you happen to be in their "in" group), it's just others who aren't you I don't want to exist, why do you have a problem with that??"

Same type of person who thinks they can completely fuck over one person without affecting their relationships with mutual friends, like everything is a set of one on one relationships that can't overlap.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dashi@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Of course you can have differing opinions and be friends. There are obviously scales of importance.

If you believe people with a different skin color than you should be slaves, we won't be friends.

If you believe Trans rights shouldn't exist, we won't be friends.

If you believe climate change is a world ending catastrophe and all cars should be baned we may be able to be friends because I disagree on the baning of cars.

If you think gun reform is required we will probably be friends but we will probably have different ideas of how to go about it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] RadicallyBland@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago

and if Trump being a FELON And RAPIST isn't enough to get you to overcome the Democrat bias you were raised with.. you are a sad, disgusting person. No, we cannot be friends if you support him. Kamala: I want to support the working class and help people buy homes. Trump: I will immediately punish everyone who has opposed me. The two sides are not the same. Maybe before Trump you could pretend they were. They weren't.. but the GOP kinda pretended they weren't fascist POSs. Project 2025 just fucking comes out and says it. They want to overthrow democracy.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

i CaN hAvE A dIfFeReNt oPiNiOn, bRo! Gaawd!

(Fascism is not an opinion. It's a fucking disease.)

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago

This reminds me of the, "We can negotiate and find a middle ground" argument. No we fucking can't. Your opening position is so extreme that there is no possible way that we can find a middle ground because even the middle ground would be too extreme for me to accept.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

We can't be friends. Ok. But we can still fuck. Right?

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 4 months ago

Wth dude. No. I mean, once maybe.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

They literally crashed grindr. So yes.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Part of the issue is, what we used to think of as "politics", the discourse about what's best for society and what will lead to happy lives for all, is rarely spoken about. What we have now is "RAGE-politics", where people insert completely ridiculous non-sequitur concepts about who's at fault into the minds of malleable victims and have them frame it as an identity.

Insurrection is not a political point of view.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 months ago

I have friends from all over the spectrum (both kinds). I don't care if they're assholes or arrogant, but I appreciate they're politically motivated and fight for what they believe in.

Being friends with them also helps deradicalize them. If they're a good person, why not be a ground truth to help them see what's going on?

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

If your political opinion includes the phrase " you should die"

It's going to be hard to stay friends

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

This wasn't always the stance for the right wingers, therefore it did used to be entirely possible to disagree politically and still be friends. But the new right is openly hostile to everything and everyone, so I agree. If you support that shit then we are not friends. As a matter of fact, if you are an enemy of democracy, you are my enemy.

[-] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

What? This has always been their plans, they just used to be more subtle about it. This is the same group that started the drug crisis so they could continue arresting black people and hippies with impunity, who let Vietnam go on way longer so a Republican could be involved in peace, who used said drug money to fund terrorist cells when the middle east had a little too much freedom and elected leaders for them.

They've been comically evil for longer than most people in the world have been alive, now they just have a criminally insane figurehead spouting all that shit publicly

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
1584 points (95.6% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

835 readers
372 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS