240
submitted 3 months ago by CanadaPlus to c/world@lemmy.world

Per the rules, this is the original headline. However, the interesting part is that he's preparing a Gaza offer that he says will be "final".

They've hewn very close to the whole "unconditional support" thing, so I'm curious what that means exactly.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 84 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hmmm, let's see, Netanyahu has been non-stop bombing Gaza since... last October.

It's almost October again. It's nearly been a full year since the actual initial attack.

There was never a justification to still be bombing nearly a year later after one attack.

It's clear Netanyahu has no intention to stop.

[-] CanadaPlus 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Man, I really wish I could have changed the headline. I'm going to get mostly comments like this, I think.

No hate, there's only so much time in a day to read Lemmy.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago

It's not your fault that all titles are now effectively clickbait. Thanks for putting the important info in the body of your post.

[-] goferking0 22 points 3 months ago

And clear Biden won't do anything to get him to stop :(

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

He added that the US would not give up, and would "push as hard as we can" for a deal.

If denying future arms shipments isn't on the table then this statement is a lie

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If only Biden had some kind of leverage he could use on Bibi like putting conditions on arms exports oh wait he completely refuses to do that so this is just bs rhetoric

[-] CanadaPlus 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I'm not sure what the plan is if they turn down the "final" offer. The last time the US bluffed, that I know of, was the red line in Syria, and that involved a place Americans don't care about, and would have involved another American war in the Middle East to respond to.

I find "China's final warning" and actual consequences for Israel equally unlikely. Is there a third option?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I'm not sure what the plan is if they turn down the "final" offer.

You're not? The plan is to enable genocide no matter what.

[-] Malidak@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The US will never stop supporting Israel. They are too dependent on it geopolitically. I believe we may see some more inner political movement against Netanjahu supported by certain US agencies. He will not survive this conflict as prime minister. This will of course not help Palestinians in the long run but it may help with a ceasefire and as a result help the democrats in the upcoming election which would be the main goal right now.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

A final offer is followed by a final solution

[-] tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

He should pull the plug on the iron dome

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

He won't because he's a Zionist. Biden will literally spend the rest of his presidency helping Netanyahu help trump get elected

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Hopefully, this means that Bibi repeatedly humiliating the US finally broke through the fucking insane inflexible support the US has had for Israel the past 40 years.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

You’d think.

But Biden is still gargling those balls; and still hasn’t stopped weapons shipments.

Guess 4.2 million . Is a lot of loyalty.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

He's not? That's shocking! Almost like.....no, it couldn't be

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago

"You're not doing enough, so here's another 10 billion in arms funding. You have to spend that in America though because I am very upset with you Bibi."

[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

Oh it's final this time. 5 more years of this and Israel will see their supply drying up, you know, maybe, possibly.

Oh, oh, now you done it, that's another 10000 children. You're very very close to the limit, mister. You better watch out or, you'll get slighly less aid next time! We're not kidding this time.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm honestly seeing parallels to how Milosevic had a limit for how long he could delay a cease fire

[-] CanadaPlus 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hey, I had trouble finding info on this with a quick search. Can I have a recap?

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 3 months ago

Just a historical comparison I'm making based on the Wikipedia articles for the Kosovo War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia

A NATO-facilitated ceasefire between the KLA and Yugoslav forces was signed on 15 October 1998, but both sides broke it two months later and fighting resumed. When the killing of 45 Kosovar Albanians in the Račak massacre was reported in January 1999, NATO decided that the conflict could only be settled by introducing a military peacekeeping force to forcibly restrain the two sides.[50] Yugoslavia refused to sign the Rambouillet Accords, which among other things called for 30,000 NATO peacekeeping troops in Kosovo; an unhindered right of passage for NATO troops on Yugoslav territory; immunity for NATO and its agents to Yugoslav law; and the right to use local roads, ports, railways, and airports without payment and requisition public facilities for its use free of cost.[51][35] NATO then prepared to install the peacekeepers by force, using this refusal to justify the bombings.

It took years of fighting, but eventually both sides' refusal to sign a ceasefire was used as justification for NATO to neutralize the military forces in the region.

[-] CanadaPlus 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh, I see. I thought you meant they gave Milosevic a specific 6-month deadline or something.

If this was a conflict pretty much anywhere else, I think it would have gotten the standard UN ethnic spat protocol from the get-go. Instead, we're at least back to the 90's in international law.

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Lmao I read that as "Biden not doing enough to secure Gaza hostage deal, says Biden," and got real confused.

[-] CanadaPlus 2 points 3 months ago

Man, he's really slipping these days... /s

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Biden probably means that Netanyahu hasn't murdered enough children, and will follow up by sending more weapons.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 3 months ago
[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I wish Dark Brandon hadn't turned into DARK Brandon. 'Cause things turned dark very quickly.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
240 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39347 readers
2390 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS