not all brains” have the “same abilities” and that AI tools can reduce the financial burden of hiring human writing assistants

The path to equality does not necessarily lie in degrading the value of human creativity.

NaNoWriMo’s annual creative writing event is the organization’s flagship program that challenges participants to create a 50,000-word manuscript every November.

I would prefer to write 1,000 good words slowly than right 50,000 ungood word fastlier.

If you have Dyslexia then ChatGPT is a better spellcheck than whatever's in your writing software. I won't pretend to know all the applications of AI to help neurodiverse people to write but there are ways to use AI in writing that is very helpful to them. I wouldn't say having AI blurt out 50,000 words of nothing is particularly helpful to any writer though.

I can see the benefits of AI in certain fields of work but why would you want it to take over in the creative industry? Isn't tapping into your own creativity the fun part?

Nanowrimo is already in flames because of last years 'groomer mod' scandal. Why would they choose now to weigh in on such a controversial topic rather than working on filling all the staff vacancies, rebuilding trust in their community, and developing new volunteers to replace all the ones they fired and ghosted? All they've got to do here is keep their mouths shut and rebuild the damn organization and they can't even do that...

Isn't the whole point to challenge yourself by writing a novel? I wouldn't submit whatever I wrote because writing a novel in a month means it's probably not going to be very good.

I mean I don't care one way or the other if people use ChatGPT to do this, but it seems like they're not really challenging themselves.

AI tools can reduce the financial burden of hiring human writing assistants

... Are MFs hiring teams to help them with the "let's do a fun writing project" month?

I admit that I haven't been keeping track of NaNoRiMo since I heard about it a few decades ago, but isn't the point of it to commit to that personal writing project, and having accountability partners and stuff?

Anyway; Fuck AI books, in whole or part. If you can't write, then don't write. If you write shitty, then write shitty. You'll either get better with practice, or you wont, but it's better than cheating on homework that you assigned to yourself.

Fucking horrid.

Their announcement reads like an update of the classic “If by Whisky” speech.

Has writing the novel changed in the last several decades? It used to be very rare that any given writer would hit the best seller list, everyone else was steered towards taking writing classes or purchasing somewhat pricey seminars. What is the motive to defend AI writing bots? AI isn't going to be purchasing seminars or taking classes.

“Generative AI empowers not the artist, not the writer, but the tech industry,” Star Wars: Aftermath author Chuck Wendig said in response to NaNoWriMo’s stance. “It steals content to remake content, graverobbing existing material to staple together its Frankensteinian idea of art and story.”

One problem, if it even is a problem, is that NaNoWriMo uses a honour system for the word counts. They had word count verification in past but it accepted "obfuscated" manuscripts (each letter replaced with random letters, or something similar). They don't have any way of assessing the quality of the writing, and that absolutely goes against the spirit of the event anyway.

(For a lot of writers this could be the first time they try writing a novel. Last thing they want is an algorithm rejecting their work if it sounds too much like AI. That'd be fucking horrible.)

Ultimately, NaNoWriMo isn't about quality of writing, it's about getting into the habit producing text for 30 days. Using any AI to create novel text goes straight up against that idea.

I've always said it's OK that you're not producing your 100% best prose in some NaNoWriMo days. Or just come up with tangentially related ramblings. It's, uh, a postmodern composition technique. But try to use a brain, OK? AI will just produce irrelevant nonsense. One of my fave technique is that if I'm really desperate in NaNoWriMo, I fire up lipsum.com and generate a day's worth of lorem lipsum nonsense. I can do it once. Then I must remove words from that block if I exceed the daily quota.

While I wouldn't condone using an AI to create an entire novel, I would be fine with a human using ChatGPT to generate topics, prompts, and check spelling & grammar.

AI is a tool. It can be used for good, and it can be used for bad. Much like a hammer. There are both good and bad ways to use them.

There's no reason for there to be prohibition of AI generation; just prohibition of AI Generation being the only source of text.