70
submitted 3 weeks ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Babs@hexbear.net 70 points 3 weeks ago

This is being sold as a security measure, but it's really a heavily-lobbied economic measure to benefit a single American drone company. Skydio, DJI's largest American competitor, can't compete with cheap Chinese drones used for commercial purposes like farming and surveying, so over the last two years they have spent over a million dollars on lobbying efforts to take out their rival. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary?cycle=2022&id=D000086902

Skydio drones are expensive, and the company has deep ties with American, British, and Israeli militaries. They have also completely pulled out of the consumer market, focusing purely on commercial and military drones, so a DJI ban will be a serious blow to drone hobbyists, independent professional pilots, and smaller companies that can't afford to pay thousands of dollars for a drone that they used to be able to get for $400-$1000.

[-] blame@hexbear.net 47 points 3 weeks ago

amazing that you only have to spend a million dollars for this result. I guess having the tailwinds of American politicans losing their shit over China helps.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 47 points 3 weeks ago

It’s been shocking recently to realize how cheap it actually is to buy off an American politician

Like with the influence AIPAC has, you’d think they’re throwing around tens of millions, even billions of dollars at candidates. But most of the time it’s like, they gave this house member 5 grand and now he’s Israel’s lapdog for life.

Like if I got a few friends together we could scrounge up enough money to buy off a politician apparently. It’s baffling.

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago

Like if I got a few friends together we could scrounge up enough money to buy off a politician apparently.

Mutual aid comm but we just bribe politicians.

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago

Fr. One of my local politicians folded to a slumlord for maybe $1000. Double disrespect.

[-] RION@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Does anything beat the guy who uncapped interest rates for the entire credit card industry in exchange for a few IHOPs?

https://www.idler.co.uk/article/adam-curtis-social-media-is-a-scam/

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

if I got a few friends together we could scrounge up enough money to buy off a politician

It would suddenly be bribery. Fuck you <3 amerikkka

[-] miz@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Richie Torres probably did it for a pair of Yankees tickets

[-] pumpchilienthusiast@hexbear.net 34 points 3 weeks ago

This is being sold as a security measure, but it's really a heavily-lobbied economic measure to benefit a single American drone company.

surprised-pika

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

Aren’t DJI drones used by like, every emergency service in the US with a need for drones?

[-] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, and it's been hugely expensive to work around these nonsense restrictions. I'm not exaggerating when I say there's already been years of setbacks in the expansion of ems/fire UAS programs.

[-] Babs@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago

Basically everyone who is allowed to use a DJI will use one. They're great drones and far cheaper than anything domestically produced. It's not even a close competition.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

Skydio

nothing creepy about naming your drone company "sky god"

[-] miz@hexbear.net 37 points 3 weeks ago

you know what'll help America compete in drone warfare, obviously the biggest change in warfare since nukes?

shutting off all hobbyists so your next generation never played with drones as a high schooler

[-] darkcalling@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

In their opinion it doesn't matter.

Firstly because either the US is going to war with China within the next 8 years or it's not happening because the US would be at such a disadvantage and like all bullies they won't pick a fight with an evenly matched opponent. Secondly because military drone systems used by the US are not really like those used by other countries. For example, Russia and Ukraine are using near off the shelf kit and standing in a field while US drones are controlled from a bunker or command shack or place on a US navy ship from a system that looks like it's from a Dave and Busters racing game with the whole big seat, multiple monitors, joy-stick and additional controls. US is just not interested in that kind of drone warfare. They've gone all in on the idea of semi-autonomous "AI" systems and swarms controlled by 1-2 trained people per swarm from a great distance. Thirdly the US has long had this image of it's military as this highly trained, highly disciplined, elite force while simultaneously seeing Russians/Chinese as "hordes" of under-trained, under-motivated, under-equipped canon fodder so they turn up their nose to certain types of tactics as being for those others.

Fourth, the US is worried about domestic insurrection and discontent over worsening economic conditions. The worse thing you want to do in that situation is empower the ordinary people to wage insurrection using the type of tactics and methods (drones) field-proven by unconventional militias and militant groups across the middle east. These types of drones and easy cheap access to them is also a nightmare for operational security of military bases and internal security forces operations.

Unironically the US wants and is working hard on killbots they can fire and forget for attacks and area denial. They know among other things they can't fight China navy to navy over Taiwan so instead the plan shifts to this idea of naval and aerial drones, semi-autonomous that are basically killbots or self-propelled targeting mines that they'd unleash in the hundreds and thousands in the straits to deny China the ability to send landing craft or support ships near Taiwan and buy them time to hold the island and strike at and destroy China's navy from beyond the horizon. This is actually not a bad answer to the problem of traditional mining that mine-sweeper ships can just clear an area, mine-sweepers don't work if the mines actively hone in on and swarm your clearing ship when you get anywhere near any of them.

The US military is not agile in the way the Russian military or the Ukrainian bandits are. It's a big, expensive, lumbering machine and that's the way they like it and that's the way it's going to be because it produces more profit for Raytheon and because it suits their self-image.

The real losers are local EMS, fire, cops, even the FBI who get hit in the budget much harder acquiring drones now.

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

High schoolers will just have to learn to be a soldier the true and tested, old American way

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

These are not the same drones used lol

Ukraine uses them cause they're poor and need to be scrappy

America ain't gonna do this

[-] miz@hexbear.net 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

these 21st century Smoot-Hawley Tariffs are a good idea and I encourage the USA in strangling itself

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago

For those of us who don’t remember high school US history very well:

[Passed in 1930] The Act and tariffs imposed by America's trading partners in retaliation were major factors of the reduction of American exports and imports by 67% during the Great Depression. Economists and economic historians have a consensus view that the passage of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff worsened the effects of the Great Depression.

[-] pumpchilienthusiast@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the revenue curve, you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

fr the only reason I remember the name smoot hawley tbh, though I think they did come up once in school mayyyybe

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

As oft repeated, the US government doesn’t like when its potential spying capacity is muscled in on by others.

[-] Hohsia@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

All glory to China and the CPC

[-] buh@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

Infrastructure week stopped working as a distraction, so now they’re doing “china week”

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

America loves sanctions so much it is now sanctioning itself. amerikkka-clap

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago

Deeply unserious country

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

DJI, which sells more than half of all drones in the United States, opposes the bill that it said "restricts the ability of U.S. drone operators to buy and use the right equipment for their work, solely on the basis of the equipment's country of origin."

America is stupid

[-] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

This is almost as dumb as the tariffs on Chinese solar panels and electric cars from earlier in the year.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago

too bad i already have a banned DJI drone! come get it before it flies over a mansion and takes pictures!

[-] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

like shark week? wtf does that mean?

[-] asante@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

shark week but instead they vote to import blahajs

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

Hahahaha fuck this place.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

honestly I'd love to get into drones but I have no desire to register with the FAA or get some shit that's going to get shut down remotely by government fiat in a few months to years, so I guess DIY and under 250g is the spot to start.

edit: ah shit ardupilot looks sick and some diy 250g drones actually have decent runtime it looks like

Only sales is blocked. My drone is already out of support, and works fine without internet. So if this passes it won’t affect me.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

from the article:

The bill, which still needs to be approved by the U.S. Senate before it could become law, would prohibit the company's products from operating on U.S. communications infrastructure.

clearly targeting the operation of drones that are flown over cellular connections. Short range RF remotes probably wouldn't be affected but I could see smartphone apps getting pulled as well

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Muh free market?

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Conservatives should be pissed off because they won’t be able to stockpile cheap drones to LARP as guerrilla fighters

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yellow Peril Week

[-] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

MIC Sweeps Week.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

news

23456 readers
709 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS