152
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

🌏👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀🌌

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Im curious what the translation is for this

[-] twack@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

It translates to this meme template.Always has been meme template

[-] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago

From memes cant, this translates to "always has been," though case and tense may vary.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Всегда так было

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

While that is probably true, I also suspect she is building up a bug out fund for when Trump either loses or croaks. She seems smart enough to realize that either one of those situations are going to be a grand old fuckfest.

[-] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

Gee whiz - who'd've thought that the woman who married a rich guy who looks (and notoriously smells) like a gigantic ambulatory drain clog would be so mercenary.

[-] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

I'd just like to express my appreciation for allowing me to add "gigantic ambulatory drain clog" to my vocabulary.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago

Remember that she promised a press conference to explain how a soft core porn model got a 'genius' visa.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I know the answer, I don't mind it, and, in fact, encourage the immigration of hot milfs who are willing to pose nude.

Further, in the interest of equality, I demand two genius slots immediately be created and granted to a hot DILF and a XILF.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

I think that MILFs already have a slot.

You think you're the only one who can be juvenile on the interwebs?

DID YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT??

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

Well played...

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago
[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I"ll chip in $1.

So that's a full $3.50 for you Melina, any time you want it.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Gat damn Loch Ness Monster!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

She saw what Stormy was getting. That's why she was pissed.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Tit for Tit

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm kind of surprised we haven't seen more from Ms. Daniels.

edit = I meant a movie bio or another book.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

She's a hard-core porn star. What hasn't she shown?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I was thinking a film bio or another book.

[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 19 points 2 months ago

Grifters gonna grift, no matter their first name

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 2 months ago

CNN: We're in the business of selling advertisements, I think we should understand better than most that we are providing you a service.

Them: Aren't you a news organization?

CNN:

[-] some_guy 3 points 2 months ago

Sleaze here.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

It might be worth it if she would actually tell the truth.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/10/03/politics/melania-trump-book-cnn-interview/index.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
152 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2849 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS