322
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

More than two-thirds of Taiwanese people would be willing to fight off a Chinese invasion of their island, a new survey found. Just over half of respondents believe that the United States would send its military to help.

Most Taiwanese people would be willing to defend their island against a Chinese attack, according to a poll published Wednesday. Most also believe that such an attack is highly unlikely in the next five years.

The poll, commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, was released a day before Taiwan's National Day.

Should Beijing attack, 67.8% of the 1,214 people surveyed said they would be "very willing or somewhat willing" to fight in defense of Taiwan; 23.6% said they would not be.

Almost 64% said China's "territorial ambition" in Taiwan represents "a serious threat." At the same time, 61% said it was not likely China would invade soon.

Some 52% of respondents said that they believed key ally the United States would come to their aid in the invent of a Chinese invasion. Yet, only 40% believed that the US would send its navy to "break" a potential blockade.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 2 months ago

I think generally most people are willing to defend their home against foreign invaders if it is at all realistic/possible. I have heard people say about refugees "Why dont they defend their homes, then they wouldnt have to flee". But this obviously only makes sense if there is a chance of winning. When your enemies are overwhelmingly more powerful and you have no allies, then what is the point in dying for nothing.

With Taiwan they know that they have a decent military and worldwide support. So this makes sense to me.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

And many flee civil wars which are more complicated than kicking out a foreign invaders.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

Yeah good point. When things arent easily sorted into "good" and "bad" then getting people to put together an organized resistance is much much harder.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

That's when a dehumanized other comes in handy.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

A Syrian friend in Turkey once explained to me that Turks (who love playing tough but haven't fought a conventional war since WWI) tell Syrian refugees that they should have stayed and fought... and he'd tell them that no matter how brave you are - and Syrians are in my opinion uniquely brave - "you cannot defeat tanks and aircraft with Kashinkovs. Look at Ukraine, where they have a modern military that is weaker. Look how many left. But Syrians are supposed to fight Russian bombers and Assad's tanks with their hands?"

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

Of Ukraine is anything to go off of, initial success in repelling the invasion will lead to a nationalistic wave of support, but as the war devolves into grinding attrition with China unable to get a foothold on Taiwan and the Taiwanese unable to do anything about Chinese firepower raining down on critical infrastructure, the population will want to find some sort of peace deal.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The only 'peace deal' would be surrender. They would be returning the attacks on mainland China. They could easily reach any coastal areas: Shanghai, Canton, Hong Kong etc.

[-] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Xiamen, a city with a population of more than 4 million people, is directly across the Strait from Taiwan.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

The US will sink the entire island before China is allowed to occupy it.

I’m willing to defend my home if the people ruling it are worth defending.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You'd think so, but Europe has some pathetically low numbers for this question, with many countries below 50% and a few in the 30s.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

Eh i wouldnt worry about it too much. That number would change very quickly if it came to an actual situation.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social -1 points 1 month ago

Because from 1990-2022, "fight for your country" meant help the US invade some country in the Middle East. No shit no one in Germany or France wants to do that.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Err... Taiwan is refugees, who fled China when Mao won the civil war

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

And how does that have anything to do with the current political siuation mr troll? People declaring independence is a thing that has been happening everywhere since forever. You think the US should be taken back by the British?

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mainland China has a long history of nearby small islands kicking their ass.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

Today is our National Day, which is the day China(modern day Taiwan) defeated the last emperor (Qing dynasty).

Basically it's our Independence Day.

Most of us are willing to give our lives for our Independence.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
322 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39231 readers
2045 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS