291

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22077561

“I’m not interested in anyone who is moving further away from the center,” said Cindy Bass, a Pennsylvania committee member from Philadelphia. “The center is where we have to be.”

They're not going to change a thing unless people make them.

Find your local state delegate and personally tell them how you feel a centrist is only going to guarantee another Republican victory. They are listed here: https://ballotpedia.org/Democratic_National_Committee

Bernie Sanders is working behind the scenes to get a progressive in there but he can't do it alone.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SonicDeathTaco@lemm.ee 90 points 1 week ago

I love how they think the best way forward is to become the embodiment of the election strategy that just failed so spectacularly for Harris. Brilliant.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

2016: "We don't need to change! Look at our opponent, Trump!"

2020: "We'll pretend to be M4A. But the main thing is beating Trump! Worry about change later!"

2024: "We lost, but we did everything right. Americans are the problem. Anyways, Trump is in his last term, so why change?"

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

Then make sure to tell the people actually voting for the chair to give the pushback they need to see that's a mistake. Change is only going to come when we speak up

[-] SonicDeathTaco@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

I'm more interested in mobilizing people outside of the electoral process at this point.

I will continue to vote but, on a national level, I no longer believe that lasting meaningful change will happen at the ballot box.

I have even less faith in the DNC ability to drive that change regardless of who is the chair. I think the best hope in that regard is an insurgent campaign a'la Bernie 2016/2020, and even then...idk.

There is power where there is people, the DNC seem to see this as an inconvenience. People are where I'm interested in spending my energy now.

Spending meaningful political capital on the DNC seems about as effective as that billion dollars in donations was for the Harris campaign this cycle.

Not discouraging anyone from doing it, as much as encouraging y'all to put the work in outside of the electoral process.

You do you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Centrist Democrats are revolting.

As they begin to dissect their collapse in the presidential election, some Democratic National Committee members are concluding that the party is too “woke,” too focused on identity politics and too out of touch with broad stretches of America.

[…]

Or as one DNC member from Florida put it: “I don’t want to be the freak show party, like they have branded us. You know, when you’re a mom with three kids, and you live in middle America and you’re just not really into politics, and you see these ads that scare the bejesus out of you, you’re like, ‘I know Trump’s weird or whatever, but I would rather his weirdness that doesn’t affect my kids.’”

Aka the libs want to turn on trans people.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

Point me to a moment during the last campaign that Kamala promoted identity politics. The very most important thing we should do is to nit listen to pundits.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Point me to a moment during the last campaign that Kamala promoted identity politics.

They can't. But the alternative is admitting that moving to the right has failed, and centrists will never do that.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Middle America is about 20y behind the rest of us, this is the 90s gay marriage situation all over again. If the DNC actually wants to win elections they need to stop putting narrow identity groups front and center and run on their track record of positive economic policy for everyone or they're going to lose every election for the next 20y (barring those won by voter backlash over catastrophic Republican admin fuck-ups.)

The DNC went too far down the identity politics rabbit hole and hasn't quite realized that people in the identity demographics they want to Jenga together into 270 EC votes are willing to vote for the other side because they're not happy with the DNC's corporate profit economy.

The critical flaw in the DNC's 20y old identity politics strategy is the assumption that these identity groups are monolithic. It's a prejudiced as hell position to take that "these are the interests of all women" or "these are the interests of all black people" and yet that's what the DNC has tried to do for the last three elections running. It should be painfully obvious at this point that this doesn't work: women, PoC and Muslims voted for Trump in droves (or stayed home in protest) despite the front and center spending to bring those groups on side this election. Everyone's tired of performative pandering and wants real economic and policy reform to help recover some of what was lost to the last couple of economic crashes and to inflation.

The meme is already stale but JFC they've learned nothing from the last two election losses - the Harris campaign was the 2016 Clinton campaign minus the fundraising dinners on Wall St.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Middle America is about 20y behind the rest of us, this is the 90s gay marriage situation all over again. If the DNC actually wants to win elections they need to stop putting narrow identity groups front and center

The RNC did that. Democratic candidates, in their trademark panicked cowardice, parroted right wing bigotry about boys in girls' sports in their own campaign ads.

Most of the time, when Democrats mentioned trans people at all, they were making sure to let everyone know that they didn't have their backs. Add that to breaking solidarity with Muslim voters, and you have a party that broadcasted that it was eager to throw vulnerable populations under the bus.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The conservative media machine has been splitting wedges between groups basically forever, it's a convenient way to pit people against each other.

The DNC, in their infinite wisdom, took that political landscape and instead of bringing everyone together in a big tent decided to pick out specific identity groups to pander to and drove the original wedges clean through.

I'm almost convinced the DNC wants to lose at this point, they seem pretty content with the position of professional minority opposition - it's a convenient place to be if you want to fundraise endlessly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)

Jesus. They’ve learned nothing:

He added, “Trump really kind of ran up numbers everywhere, you know what I mean? There was clearly a strategy not focusing on one place or another. And as a party we have to do that.”

THATS NOT WHAT FUCKING HAPPENED.

Trumps numbers barely moved.

Harris’s numbers PLUMMETED compared to Trump’s 4 years ago. Start there. That’s where you need to start this postmortem.

[-] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 59 points 1 week ago

So, to solve the problem of the left not voting them, they are moving further to the right.

Yeah, America, I'm sorry to tell you but you are screwed. You have 4 years to either behead the dnc and turn it into a left wing party, or greate an actual left party.

Otherwise, you're going to be eating fascism fo dinner until you implode.

[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Well for that to happen Nancy and Chuck have to kick the bucket first

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Brodysseus@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

I really wish they would put out a survey for voters. Some way to collect data about what people actually want. Like a huge survey, let every registered dem fill it out.

If they're talking about running some bland business-as-usual candidate then that'll lose. People want change.

Based on their track record I have no faith in progress.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

As they begin to dissect their collapse in the presidential election, some Democratic National Committee members are concluding that the party is too “woke,” too focused on identity politics and too out of touch with broad stretches of America.

From the bottom of my heart, fuck these people. They've moved so far towards neoliberal policy positions that they no longer have an economic message to give their working-class base. In the absence of a coherent economic vision for the party, they keep doubling down on, "identity politics," to keep the the Obama Coalition happy; they have nothing to unify their base, so their only option is to take up any position that is important to the demographic groups that make up the party. Now that this strategy has been thoroughly and decisively defeated, their reaction isn't to return to the progressive economic policies that won them these groups in the first place, but instead to figure which minorities are, "unpopular," so they can abandon them. What a bunch of stupid, shortsighted cowards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Please spread, cross post, share, whatever; wherever you can. People should have input into the democratic policy platform, but they're so brazen as to say the "center is where we need to be".

These people, these few hundred people, are a big problem with the democratic party.

We need to take the narrative back from centrists. It can be done by telling the DNC what to do, not the other way around.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Does the article tell us how to cast a vote? I skimmed it and couldn’t find a link to where I could at least send an email.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not voted on directly, you are going to want to talk to your state's party chair to try to convince them vote on the type of chair like you would a congress person on a vote for something. In the body of the post, you can find how to find your state's party chair

Here's the table copied over:

State Chair | State Chair
Alabama Randy Kelley | Montana Robyn Driscoll
Alaska Mike Wenstrup | Nebraska Jane Kleeb
American Samoa Patrick Ti'a Reid[15] | Nevada Daniele Monroe-Moreno
Arizona Yolanda Bejarano | New Hampshire Raymond Buckley
Arkansas Grant Tennille | New Jersey LeRoy J. Jones, Jr.
California Rusty Hicks | New Mexico Jessica Velasquez
Colorado Shad Murib | New York Jay Jacobs
Connecticut Nancy DiNardo | North Carolina Anderson Clayton
Delaware Elizabeth D. Maron | North Dakota Adam Goldwyn
District of Columbia Charles Wilson | Ohio Liz Walters
Florida Nikki Fried | Oklahoma Alicia Andrews
Georgia Nikema Williams | Oregon Rosa Colquitt
Guam Anthony Babauta[16] | Pennsylvania Sharif Street
Hawaii Derek Turbin | Puerto Rico Charles Rodriguez
Idaho Lauren Necochea[17] | Rhode Island Liz Beretta-Perik
Illinois Elizabeth Hernandez | South Carolina Christale Spain
Indiana Mike Schmuhl | South Dakota Shane Merrill
Iowa Rita Hart | Tennessee Hendrell Remus
Kansas Jeanna Repass | Texas Gilberto Hinojosa
Kentucky Colmon Elridge | U.S. Virgin Islands Carol M. Burke[18]
Louisiana Randal Gaines | Utah Diane Lewis
Maine Bev Uhlenhake | Vermont David Glidden
Maryland Ken Ulman | Virginia Susan Swecker
Massachusetts Steve Kerrigan | Washington Shasti Conrad
Michigan Lavora Barnes | West Virginia Mike Pushkin
Minnesota Ken Martin | Wisconsin Ben Wikler
Mississippi Cheikh Taylor | Wyoming Joe Barbuto
Missouri Russ Carnahan | Democrats Abroad Martha McDevitt-Pugh
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

It's not like that boat will be tallied or even looked at, If you don't have millions of bucks to give them, you don't have a voice in government.

[-] dumples@midwest.social 28 points 1 week ago

Frankly more people were excited about Tim Walz then Kamala Harris. Let's get more MN politicians in there instead of people from the coasts. The focus on getting someone from the Midwest is the only good news I see. We need someone from Minnesota, Wisconsin or Michigan to lead the party from the inside. They might be fully progressive but understand how to organize and message to everyone. They can't just float by on politics as usual

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah get a progressive Minnesotan.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago

Is abolishing the DNC an option? Otherwise, we're wasting valuable time.

I remain convinced that any effective resistance to Trump and MAGA will have to come from outside the Democratic Party.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

I'm sure that the same people who couldn't deliver Bernie Sanders an overwhelming win in 2020 can suddenly become savvy pols who can just put together a national third party.

If you want action, do what AOC and the others in her squad did. Work inside the Dem party.

Take a lesson from the right. Back in the 1970s Jerry Falwell decided to take control of the GOP. He did it from the ground up. If the local GOP club had had twenty people show up to the last meeting to pick the next county clerk, Falwell's people would show up with fifty people. Soon those county clerks and sheriffs were becoming Congresspeople and Senators.

Politics is a game and the left sucks at playing it.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

So either we are to believe they've learned nothing and will continue to alienate their base, while remaining inept fools on the international stage, OR their idea of rebuilding a carbon copy of the previous failures is by design.

A centrist DNC is a loser. A center-right DNC is a loser. The DNC will never beat the Republicans at their own game, so either these strategists are the densest people on the planet, or they are the mouthpieces of Controlled Opposition, exactly as expected.

There is no duality in which savvy, intelligent political players arrive at "Centrism wins," without some inherent greasy, malfeasant ulterior motives.

It's difficult to even pretend that they are serious in this endeavor; their every action and utterance is an admission of planned incompetence.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

You can vote for whomever you wish but they will continue to serve the rich donor class, as usual.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Remember when they picked Tom Perez, the croaking geezer, over Kieth Ellison. Your voice won't be heard because that's not who they're listening for.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

They lost the election by running an essentially republican candidate. Fingers crossed for a progressive chair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

They have their big donors who give them their marching orders. They really don't care if they win or not, so long as they are getting paid.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

That's funny that you believe that your voice will be heard if you're not amongst the donor class. They only answered the money, something none of us have.

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Looked mine up... There's part off the problem...

Compensation

Base salary $174,000

Net worth (2012) $54,251,531.50

[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

They must never order avocado toast. /s

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

So uh, why is there an NY representative in the CA seat again? So much for local representation I guess.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They've already decided who's taking over, nothing the progressives do will shift the needle.

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory is the Democrat way.

[-] abracaDavid@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Y'all have to let the DNC go. They are never going to do what is right for the people.

It's time for a new party. How many times are we going to watch them fail us before we make a change?

Y'all are like Charlie Brown running up to kick the football right before Lucy pulls it away.

We've seen them fail us time and time again on issues that they absolutely had the power to fix.

This is the party of corporate interests. They don't care about us. They've completely abandoned any platform of universal healthcare, they don't give a flying fuck about the environment, and their border policy is worse than Trump's somehow.

By repeatedly and blindly voting blue no matter who, we are enabling them to never make any changes for the good.

[-] ghen@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Your idealist solution is impossible in the practical world that we live in since first past the post voting will always favor the two gigantic parties. It is far easier to change the DNC into what we want then to create a third party

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
291 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2315 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS