135
submitted 3 weeks ago by Timbits@lemmy.ca to c/world@quokk.au

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in a speech to fellow party members in Sakarya, promised to “revise the outcome of World War I and annex Syrian territories (formerly Ottoman provinces) into Turkey,” Telegram channel "Turkey's Top News" reported.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

Turkey is such a beautiful country with great people, and I'm never going back until this bastard is deposed.

He's more dangerous than Orban

[-] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thanks pal, we’re doing our best but the game’s rigged.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

What a dunce. WW1 was over a hundred years ago now. There are probably three generations of people removed from that tune period who have lived in the area their entire lives.

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago

The wwi borders of syria don't make sense and never did. What makes sense is a hard problem though - I'm guessing tha country needs to split into 3 but I'm an outsider who locals of syria should not listen to.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

In related news, Italy announces plans to annex Turkey.

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

Or Greece annexes the rest of Cyprus...

[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 3 weeks ago

i wonder if south Italy or turkey is more fucked

[-] riverSpirit@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 weeks ago

Millions of Americans are going to descend on Turkey in a few more nights.

[-] poplargrove@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Telegram channel "Turkey Top News" reported

Maybe Erdogan did say that, but its absurd giving a Telegram channel like that as a source.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The historical precedent for a leader promising to revise the outcome of World War I is (how shall I put this) a cause for concern.

A large number of Syrians might be happy to become Turkish citizens, since many of them preferred to be in Turkey even as refugees. However, I doubt Erdogan has them in mind. I bet he's thinking about Kurds who definitely don't feel that way.

[-] ghurab@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

An Armenian news website citing some telegram channel on news about Turkey. yeaaaaaah, sounds legit /s

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Wonder if he's going to revisit Turkiye's policy on Armenians. Maybe he can ask Bibi for guidance on how to genocide if he forgot.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking dickhead. This doesn't help the turkish people, country's fucked, and this won't fix it.

source : turk

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, because having more Kurd population in Turkey will solve all problems, lol.

dafuq are you serious is everybody trying to change territories now? anybody else wants to say something?

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 11 points 3 weeks ago

Can we (the US) take the opportunity to give Texas back to Mexico?

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

Mexico: no takesies backsies.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago

Alamo? Never heard of 'er

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Curious, if that happens, is that part of EU and NATO? Or are they (EU and NATO) gonna refuse to recognize it? 🤔

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Article 6

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;

on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

I presume that the other NATO countries will refuse to recognize annexed areas as part of the territory of Turkey and so they will not be protected by the treaty. Note how the treaty already does not protect even internationally recognized parts of certain member countries (for example Hawaii).

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

What if the Syrians carry out retaliatory strikes in Turkey?

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

From when Turkey first invaded Syria:

Ulrike Franke, a fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said it is "incredibly unlikely" that Turkey would invoke Article 5 in this situation. Asking for help would amount to an embarrassing "admission of failure" on Ankara's part. And even if Turkey did, Article 5 does not mandate NATO members to join the Syrian war on Turkey's side. It merely requires allies to assist with "such action as it deems necessary."

Source.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Syria no longer has the military power to pose a real threat to Turkey, so they likely wouldn't invoke article five anyway. Plus, if they invoke article five, they would then have all of NATO camped in their backyard. That would put a serious damper on any of the more egregious things Erdogan wants to get away with.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It goes against the idea of NATO which is based off the United Nations Charter.

NATO is a defensive alliance where the respect for sovereignty and mutual defense is what makes it work.

Turkey going for annexation goes against the ideology of NATO by not respecting international sovereignty. NATO will never help them in a forceful annexation. But if everybody involved allows the annexation peacefully, eventually it will be accepted.

If Turkey annexes by force, there are 3 most likely possibilities: NATO kicks them out, NATO stays neutral and does not help (even when the Kurds/Syrians retaliate), or NATO keeps a defensive role at the border while ensuring humanitarian aid to the area.

Whether or not NATO recognizes the annexation will depend on a vote by the members (Most likely with a high approval requirement).

[-] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

If I were an authoritarian or dictator, I'd be staking a claim before my friend and admirer takes office in January.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 3 weeks ago

Do they need them?

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
135 points (95.3% liked)

World News

456 readers
572 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS