this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
136 points (74.6% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

776 readers
180 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: I also just got banned for apparently being a troll. Me. Not the person they believe to be a dragon though.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Blåhaj Lemmy and its communities have certain rules regarding respecting of one's identity and their chosen pronouns. This extends to identities and pronouns you might not agree with. Those are the rules of that space. You broke the rules. The consequences followed. This is just basic stuff.

On the other hand, if you believe certain people to be trolling with their neopronouns, then engaging with the matter in any way, is kind of "falling" for it. So, just ... don't engage? This is the internet. People get to be (more or less seriously) humanoid animals, fantasy creatures and races, and if you can't get along with that, you can expect to get thrown out of a space that explicitly welcome anyone regardless of their identity or pronouns.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 102 points 1 month ago (37 children)

People get to be (more or less seriously) humanoid animals, fantasy creatures and races, and if you can’t get along with that, you can expect to get thrown out of a space that explicitly welcome anyone regardless of their identity or pronouns.

If I were a transgender person, I would not go within ten miles of a community that was applying the same rules to fantasy creature role playing as it was to my gender pronouns. The normie world doesn’t need to have any assistance in seeing the whole thing as made up, equivalent to wanting to be called a dolphin or a mermaid, and confusing those two very, very different concepts, or treating them as deserving of precisely the same treatment and rules, sounds very wrong to me.

[–] Borger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 1 month ago

FWIW I am trans and I 100% agree with you. Been thinking about making an account on another instance, just not sure which yet.

[–] expr@programming.dev 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

100%. It is wrong to elevate roleplay (which, let's be clear, is exactly what this is) to the same level of importance as someone's actual gender identity.

It's a false equivalence and does a huge disservice to trans people who are fighting for their right to even exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Yeah, this is basically like trying to reclaim the "I sexually identify as an attack helicopter" meme. I get the admins' logic and see what they're going for, but IMO the cost in credibility is too great.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (22 children)

The users are taking issue with the admins falling for the troll and allowing the troll to make the space hostile. Their engagement is with the admin/mod response, not with the user.

If you genuinely believe dragons are real and they are able to type and have some understanding of the English language, go gather the data, get it peer reviewed and objectively verified, and go collect your Nobel Prize. Otherwise, if you occupy a space in which people must act as if dragons or Santa or Groot are real, that is an improv roleplay in which failure to say “Yes, and” is a bannable offense. Reality persists. Eppur si muove.

fantasy creatures

By using that adjective, you are implying there are creatures which do not exist. You’re defending the admin response by partaking in the same act which got the users banned.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why is it powertriping if you clearly broke the stated rules.

That’s like agreeing to a contract without any comolains and then complaining the contract is unfair if you break it.

Blahaj was never intended to be a free speech zone, it was intended to be the one place on the internet trans people feel safe, so they really don’t care what you think, it isn’t made for you.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (13 children)

As stated elsewhere here, most people would not interpret "Don't question people's gender identity" as "Don't say dragons aren't real or that people can't be dragons".

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 40 points 1 month ago

That's what that post was about? The dragon fucker dude? I blocked him within a week of him existing because he was such an annoying person. I'm as much of a furry as any other socially maladjusted child raised by the internet but have some self control, dude.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Gatekeeping” is an especially funny thing to accuse people of while you are gatekeeping.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

YDI.

The post clearly said “respect people’s pronouns, this rule will be enforced” and everyone getting mod action clearly states in response that they have read and understood the rules, but fully intend to break them.

There are absolutely ways to say “hey Ada, I think your judgement of this particular user is wrong and I am concerned about the damage drag does by engaging in trollish behavior” without also saying “but I plan to misgender people anyway.” The ones getting banned here fail on both counts.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 month ago

Now that everyone has had a chance to argue all day about this, I'm gonna lock this post so you can go touch grass.

I agree that Drag is a massive troll and that user has been banned from many instances over the past few months, including this one.

Maybe try leaving it up to the folks at blajah to decide what they want to be called and maybe just play along with it, even if you find it weird. "Normal" is so fucking boring anyway. If you really can't cope with occasionally coming across an unusual pronoun and being asked to simply accept it without having a meltdown, you probably don't belong on blajah anyway. Just move on.

The "gatekeeping" bans seem like a BPR to me given the context in which it was posted. Having said that, I don't entirely understand the rationale for blajah's rule, since the effect seems to be that you either need to be 100% behind fantasy neo-pronouns and identities (including drag? dragonfucker??) or cop a ban, but if that's how they want things then that's up to them. Not every space is for everyone, and diversity of communities and instances is mostly a good thing.

As far as our instance (dbzer0) goes, malicious/intentional misgendering of users is not permitted, similar to blajah. However, like others in this thread have argued, I agree that someone who literally identifies as a dragon fucker does not deserve to be taken seriously about anything, and it's entirely reasonable to simply assume the choice of pronouns is just another form of trolling. The context and drag's extensive mod history (along with previous alts) are important factors here too.

It's also concerning to me that people are being attacked and reported for being "bigots" or "anti-trans" in the comments just because they have hesitations over what are effectively contentious edge cases involving neo-pronouns and an infamous troll. I know for a fact that many of the commenters in this thread are very supportive of trans people, trans rights and respecting a person's chosen gender pronouns. They just have a problem with this particular dragon-fucker, not because Drag is trans, but because Drag is a narcissistic troll and a community wrecker who thrives on all the drama.

I'm leaving the comments intact for the record, but will add a CW below:

CW: possible misgendering in comments below, at least if you agree dragon fucker is a gender

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (36 children)

I suppose I should thank everyone in this comment section. I was initially feeling a little like I might have overreacted to an admin making a decision that no one in their right minds would actually defend when I sadposted on 196 about leaving, but seeing the wellspring of support for dragonfuckergender, I now feel comfortable in that leaving Blahaj is, indeed, the correct choice.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (43 children)

I'm gonna be honest, y'all kinda fucking dumb lmao.

Let's say drag is a troll. If so, then drag's wanting you to do exactly what you're doing now. You have taken the bait, hook, line and sinker. Congrats! You're helping drag cause problems! To avoid taking the bait, you gotta use drag's pronouns. Do that, and there'll be no drama for drag to stir up.

If drag isn't a troll, then you're just being a dick and intentionally causing drama when you could just use drag's pronouns. By doing so, you'd make drag feel happy and accepted; which would be very progressive of you.

Soooooo..... By posting this, at best you're just feeding a troll and making other trans people question whether or not their pronouns will be respected (no, really, when cis people start drawing lines for trans people, I get extremely uncomfortable; it's not your place to do so, fuck right off), at worst you're being a piece of shit.

Edit: the fucking entitlement of cis people telling trans people how to run their spaces is sickening. I thought Lemmy was supposed to be fairly progressive, yet once again I'm being shown that cis people believe they deserve a voice in something that has nothing to do with them. You don't get to call yourself an ally when you question someone's validity.

You disgust me.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To avoid taking the bait, you gotta use drag's pronouns

Whatever happened to good ol block button?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

"The only way to beat trolls is to comply with their every demand and especially stay silent when they get the administrators to enforce their trolling" is an interesting take, and one about as useful to a community as "Just ignore the bullies and they'll go away" is to a child.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 32 points 1 month ago (13 children)

The discussion is about people being banned from blahaj, not about whether we want to use these particular pronouns.

I’m sure the dragon user is tickled pink about all the drama, yes, but talking about policy when people are getting banned seems like a good thing to do even that notwithstanding.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It'd be one thing if this admin said, 'because this is a hard line to draw, we're not going to, just roll with it.' But no: some extreme cases are promoted as obvious and unquestionable, to include emojis as pronouns, and - literally and unironically - "I sexually identify as an attack helicopter." That is among this admin's chosen positive examples.

It'd be one thing if questioning this do-it-or-else policy was limited to meta threads. But no: this is an admin thread, in their meta community, specifically about how this rule is contentious. It is not the first such thread. It is not even the first such thread specifically about a user everyone agrees is kind of a douche. Previously, the user in charge of Liberty Hub was removed and punished for not capitalizing some known dingus's pronouns, in the ban message.

It'd be one thing if any of this was limited, in any way. But no: it's every community, forever.

For responses walking on eggshells, trying to convey - maybe there's a reason this remains an issue. Maybe gender being a spectrum and a construct doesn't get everyone on-board with erasing comments for not calling someone a unicorn. Again: actual example, presented without irony.

Being told you're not allowed to address someone as "you" is a big fuckin' ask, in English. Being told you're not allowed to treat someone as human is just bewildering. But even that, you could get away with pushing, if your push was not straight off a cliff.

ShitJustWorks feels like the only instance that learned anything from reddit. Short bans change people's behavior. Long bans change people's... usernames.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mod is definitely a dragon. We need to alert the elders

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (13 children)

PTB. This has very much soured me on Blahaj Zone, unfortunately. Not a big loss for them, since I only occasionally posted there, but very saddening to me.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m starting to believe that instances that are primarily for one and only one subgrouping are a bad idea, because bad actors just have to put on the right group appellation and the rest of the community will go to bat for whatever malicious nonsense they’ve got in mind, because “they’re one of us!” It’s the same type of thing as separating church and state.

By far the most inclusive communities, in my experience, are the fully general-purpose instances or the regional ones. It’s just too easy for “we’re supportive for the X people” to turn into “well you’re not an X person, and the person who’s beefing with you is, so GET FUCKED from all of us.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›