Yeah Wikipedia is fine if you’re just trying to find out the average daily temperature in Milwaukee in September, but for anything with nuance it’s unreliable.
Slop.
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
Funnily, now to think of it, didn't they change the article from "Uygur Genocide" to "Persecution of Uygurs in Xinjiang?"
That's exactly what I said in the comment
Uneducated liberals calling basic facts misinformation rather than ever investigate the impact propaganda has had on them.
These are exactly the kinda of people that should not be mods, as they have no humility.
In this particular case it's not actually true though, 196 mod on blahaj is on active antitankie crusade and ban everyone he suspect.
Yup, looking at the moderation history of mods such as "WillStealYourUsername" they're practically only banning people for "suspected tankie" or "tankie"
I'm sure that's true but is it really different?
Yes, it means he's not just uneducated liberal but have consciously hostile agenda.
I don't think those are incompatible. The former tends to lead to the latter, particularly those unwilling to question their own experience being propagandized.
The Uyghur wikipedia article quotes adrian fucking zenz, like come on
getting banned from 196 is a badge of honor
Clearly they don't know the lore behind Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia