this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
321 points (97.3% liked)

News

36796 readers
2302 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case has ordered the trial to begin on March 4, 2024.

The ruling came after Trump's attorneys and special counsel Jack Smith's team clashed in court Monday over when the case should go to trial.

Smith said in a filing earlier this month that he was prepared to take Trump to trial by Jan. 2, on the grounds that the date would "vindicate the public's strong interest" in a speedy trial.

Trump's lawyers, in contrast, requested that Judge Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing the case, schedule the trial for April of 2026 -- more than two and a half years from now -- due in part to the extended period of time they said they would need to review the large amount of discovery evidence the government has provided in the case.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing that cracks me up is that you have these Republican candidates running against Trump, and they are all too scared to actually attack him on the fact that he's going to prison for trying to rig the election.

In the history of the world, has there ever been an easier line of attack handed to a political opponent? But they are all cowards.

[–] killernova@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Cowards? Or secretly want to follow in his footsteps, hoping they will succeed where Donald failed. And why shouldn't they? America is clearly crumbling from within, ripe for the taking - if you can take it. They're not scared, they're evil and calculating and hungry for power. It's a sickening corporate sponsered puppet show.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 2 years ago

They probably could use the same populist rethoric to get as many votes without doing all the dumb avoidable crimes Trump have been doing.

[–] Telorand@kbin.social 48 points 2 years ago

Reminder that Project 2025 is a Heritage Foundation plan to gut the powers of Congress and policy-making commissions, and to disproportionately empower the Executive branch.

I do not think for a minute that the 2026 date is accidental.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's right in the middle of the primaries, right? That should make things interesting.

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My thoughts exactly. Furthermore, if they moved it to April 2026 and Trump—in the darkest timeline possible—won the election, the trial would be canceled altogether.

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that was definitely by design

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Blatantly so.

[–] deconstruct@lemm.ee 26 points 2 years ago

It's the day before Super Tuesday. 15 states will have primaries.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wow, one of their examples/citations of a trial taking a long time was a Judge Chutkan case, and she just reminded them that it was because of the pandemic!

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump’s lawyers, in contrast, requested that Judge Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing the case, schedule the trial for April of 2026 – more than two and a half years from now – ~~due in part to the extended period of time they said they would need to review the large amount of discovery evidence the government has provided in the case~~ in the hopes that Trump will be re-elected and thus immune from prosecution.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

Which was probably why the judge denied it. They already have reviewed all the evidence, they did it ages ago, we know they did because Trump told us he had some "irrefutable evidence" that he was going to submit in court.

So if they need more evidence they just have to ask Trump to provide it, which of course he definitely has and will be able to provide.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

It still blows my mind that this guy's still alive.

[–] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Day before Super Tuesday. Lawl.

[–] Chickens@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not political prosecution. Nope.

[–] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago

When you're a criminal they let you do it. Grab them by the indictment.

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The prosecution wanted to get the trial started earlier. An innocent defendant also would have wanted a speedy trial to get his innocence out there before the primaries, but for some reason Trump wanted to delay the trial for years.