this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
357 points (98.6% liked)

News

24665 readers
3487 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 9 points 14 hours ago

He wants to give himself awards, like any other tinpot dictator.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Well, he is a primadonna. Maybe he just wants to fulfill a lifelong dream to dance on stage dressed in a tutu...

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

The first award will go to Musk

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 31 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

So the self-appointed arbiter of American culture stumbles into another vanity project, replacing seasoned trustees with his golden-framed portrait. Drag shows for youth suddenly eclipse actual issues—because nothing unites a crumbling democracy like pearl-clutching over sequins and lip-syncing. The Kennedy Center’s new “vision” boils down to erasing anything that doesn’t smell like 1950s nostalgia and rebranding nepotism as patriotism.

Artistic merit now hinges on loyalty oaths. Meanwhile, actual policy disasters get a standing ovation. But sure, let’s pretend this isn’t a textbook narcissist playbook—appointing oneself chairman of anything is just dictator-lite cosplay. The “Golden Age” he’s selling? More like gilded decay.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

More like gold-colored spray-painted feces

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biden wasn't able to fire a simple postmaster, but somehow Trump found out he had the power to fire the board at the Kennedy center?

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biden obeys law and honored his oath so it's apples to oranges.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Supreme Court literally told him that it was impossible for the President to break the law while he was in office

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

But then they made lawfulness a subject for Supreme Court review, so only Republicans can be absolute despots. And Biden is a risk-averse institutionalist who would never consider extreme measures (like sending all the corrupt Supreme Court justices to Gitmo).

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

of course not. hes not going to be a precedent so later they say see its fine because biden did it. Man people love these damned if they do, damed if they don't situations to call out the eternal badguy. I want to know if he still beats his wife?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

wow I'm so glad he didn't set a precedent; that must be why the fascist that came after him so strictly goes by the book now.

I'd like to have what you're having.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You can't beat authoritarianism by becoming authoritarian.

[–] JordanfireStar@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Sometimes it is necessary for the long term good of humanity. Saying 'we can't use authoritarianism to beat authoritarians' is the logic that got the nazis in power in Germany. The nazis should have been crushed early on, but instead liberals just kept appeasing them.

Historically authoritarians tend not to return control to democratic processes. That is to say, you become the threat you're trying to avoid.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In Germany, it was conservatives who kept appeasing them. Hindenburg was no liberal.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

No no, liberals bad. Take your logic out of here

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

crushing fascism is not authoritarian.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Crushing fascism is authoritarian if you need to become authoritarian to do it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

what im saying is if he did he would be getting so much shit for having done so and very likely by the same types bitching about him not. its a classic damned if you do damned if you don't. he would then be responsible for every use of it after him by certain types.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

that only matters if you care about your dumbass legacy more than the future of the country, which he certainly did, which is why he sought reelection in the first place.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 9 hours ago

unless he did it in case alls that matters is caring about the rule of law and the future of the country rather than his dumbass legacy. cause then doing it was about his legacy but now not doing it was about his legacy. either way did it all for him or his kind and did the wrong thing.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 156 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Hey Mods, if Hitler was President would you censor anything calling to rise up and harm him too before or after The Holocaust? Just asking questions here.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

A better question to ask is "what are the laws surrounding direct threats of targeted violence in my nation and in the nation where the servers are?"

No instance owner should have to deal with harassment from the state because of a rando's comments.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On .world, yes they would.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Just to note this is also direction from the admin team on .world. Until significant push back, jury nullification wasn't permitted to be mentioned (despite precedence of its legality), as well as a rule to allow all opinions, regardless of the rules of the community. This was also pushed back on, and will be back after they re-word it.

This is .world at large.

Edit: typo

[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm kind of a Lemmy noob. I just realized I have a .world after my name. How do I move and where do you suggest?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

sh.itjust.works seems to be living up to its name.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends on what you're looking for in a server tbh. And there are others who would probably be more familiar than me.

db0 (instance I'm on) is great for F/LOSS, piracy, anarchism/leftists, lemm.ee for a generalist instance, blahaj for a fantastic queer community and firmly moderated safe space, etc.

You can export where youre subscribed, but your history won't move. So feel free to just make an account somewhere if it piques your interest, and go from there

Edit: Somehow missed a solid 2/3 of what I was saying about db0

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Would you like to pay to move the server to a country with free speech laws or do you just expect the people paying for the server you are using free of charge to do that on your behalf?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 77 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You would thing this guy hates colorful people or something. I swear there was some other guy that made a major push to pin all his country's issues on some minority group while he consolidated power over media, arts, and what not.

How do you suppose they redesign the flag, just replace all the stars with little swastikas or what?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago

At this point the US is beyond little swastikas, just put the old Nazi flag on top of the stars and change the red bars to be black

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If someone like Putin did this, republicans would call it dictatorial over reach, since Trump did it, it is patriotic.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago

republicans have been supporting the ukraine invasion since day 1, so i doubt it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Someone like putin is doing this.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago

nah the republicans are all pretty on board with what the sickly potato shaped dickhead who sits atop a throne of skulls in moscow does

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

he doesn't give one shit about the kennedy center. he's the first and only president/first lady to completely avoid its kennedy center honors and gala... for four straight years (all of episode 1).

he only sees a grift in there somewhere.. or some fake award or other bullshit.

or maybe he doesn't like the "a spectrum of many skills within the performing arts", which is represented by.... yup, you guessed it. a rainbow of colors including exterior lighting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_Center_Honors

or maybe it's the non-white artists-in-residence.

or maybe it's the 'festivals' that feature and celebrate art and culture from around the world.

or maybe it's just him. fucking asswipe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Looking forward to future Kennedy Center honorees Kanye West, Carrie Underwood and, what the hell, Simon Cowell.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No wait, I've got a better one!

The Kennedy Center presents: a tribute to Bill Cosby!

Live streaming only on X! Subscribe today!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Can’t wait for the Dinesh D'Souza produced, Clint Eastwood directed remake of Triumph of the Will —-“Triumph of the Steal.”

load more comments
view more: next ›