this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
813 points (99.3% liked)

196

2687 readers
2334 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Highly recommend Flowers blooming backwards into noise if you can stand the artsy presentation & the extreme themes. Especially 13:13

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

This is some Ceci n'est pas une pipe shit

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Shitty Skynet doesn't realize it's teaching us how to hide from it

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 21 hours ago

The furries will be saved

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Don't think about elephants"

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And definitely don't picture a banana in your mind.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Instructions unclear, banana stuck in dick

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't you want a dog in your static? Why are you a horrible person?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 19 hours ago

poor AI just wanted to draw some puppies

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I don't get it, it's just a picture of some static?

[–] anzo@programming.dev 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's human-like intelligence at its finest. I am not being sarcastic, hear me out. If you told a person to give you 10 numbers at random, they can't. Everyone thinks randomness is easy, but it isn't ( see: random.org )

So, of course a GPT model would fail at this task, I love that they do fail and the dog looks so cute!!

[–] kaidezee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I mean, here's a few random numbers out of my head: 1 9 5 2 6 8 6 3 4 0. I don't get it, why is it supposed to be hard? Sure, they're not "truly" random, but they sure look random /:

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

You have one of each number except 7, and you're deliberately avoiding doubles and runs of consecutive numbers. Human attempts at randomness tend to be very idealized in that way, and as a result, less random.

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Here's what my brain came up with

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5

Crazy lucky, this probably would've spawned 3 extra ender pearls

[–] YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

My favourite example of this is that IIRC itunes pushed an update that made the shuffle feature less random because they were getting complaints about it not being random enough

I bet the shuffle algorithm is sample with replacement.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They may look random but arent truly random. Computers are terrible at it too. Thats why cryptography requires external sources to generate "true" random numbers. For example, cloudflare uses a wall of lava lamps to generate randomness for encryption keys.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 7 points 22 hours ago

That's so cool.

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (10 children)

If you're not joking, the fact you have no repetition/duplicates of numbers is a pattern that would make it easy to start to predict next number. Numberphile has nice demonstration of how predictable human randomness is, it's in the first 3 minutes of the video.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Wizzard@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got some more random numbers:

8 6 7 5 3 0 9 1 1 2 3 5 8 1 2 4 8 1 6 3 2

It's not that they look random is enough - They need to BE random.

Recheck your lava lamp Wall of Entropy and generate some real rands, scrub. (/s)

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Jenny has to be so sick of those phone calls after ~40 years

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

:D. I have used this strip on multiple occasions.

It's a shame Scott Adams past work is tainted by his political statements.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 214 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] clot27@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

lmfaao, ai tryna gaslight

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wow. I ABSOLUTLY saw an image of a dog in the middle. Our brain sure is fascinating sometimes.

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 187 points 1 day ago

Get gaslit idiot

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"want me to try again with even more randomized noise?" literally makes no sense if it had generated what you asked (which the chatbot thinks it did)

[–] joshchandra@midwest.social 17 points 1 day ago

Remember, "AI" (autocomplete idiocy) doesn't know what sense is; it just continues words and displays what may seem to address at least some of the topic with no innate understanding of accuracy or truth.

Never forget that ChatGPT 2.0 can literally be run in a giant Excel spreadsheet with no other program needed. It's not "smart" and is ultimately millions of formulae at work.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago

I used to use Google assistant to spell words I couldn't remember the spelling of in my English classes (without looking at my phone) so the students could also hear the spelling out loud in a voice other than mine.

Me: "Hey Google, how do you spell millennium?" GA: "Millennium is spelled M-I-L-L-E-N-N-I-U-M."

Now, I ask Gemini: "Hey Google, how do you spell millennium." Gemini: "Millennium".

Utterly useless.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

ChatGPT: “don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog, don’t generate a dog”

Generates a dog.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

But where is the pink elephant?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Why you gotta bring your mother into this?

load more comments